These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28685488)

  • 1. The different roles of category- and feature-specific attentional control settings on attentional enhancement and inhibition.
    Wu X; Fu S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):1968-1978. PubMed ID: 28685488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feature- and category-specific attentional control settings are differently affected by attentional engagement in contingent attentional capture.
    Wu X; Liu X; Fu S
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Jul; 118():8-16. PubMed ID: 27151739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Category-based attentional capture can be influenced by color- and shape-dimensions independently in the conjunction search task.
    Wu X; Wang X; Saab R; Jiang Y
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Apr; 57(4):e13526. PubMed ID: 31953842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tracking the location of visuospatial attention in a contingent capture paradigm.
    Leblanc E; Prime DJ; Jolicoeur P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 20(4):657-71. PubMed ID: 18052780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.
    Grubert A; Fahrenfort J; Olivers CNL; Eimer M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():843-858. PubMed ID: 27554532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Context homogeneity facilitates both distractor inhibition and target enhancement.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    J Vis; 2013 May; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23650629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands.
    Kiss M; Grubert A; Petersen A; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 24(3):749-59. PubMed ID: 21861683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
    Hickey C; Di Lollo V; McDonald JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention.
    Hickey C; McDonald JJ; Theeuwes J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):604-13. PubMed ID: 16768363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contingent capture can occur at specific feature values: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Jiao J; Zhao G; Wang Q; Zhang K; Li H; Sun HJ; Liu Q
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Feb; 92(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 23069637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. All set, indeed! N2pc components reveal simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1215-30. PubMed ID: 26950386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nasotemporal ERP differences: evidence for increased inhibition of temporal distractors.
    Huber-Huber C; Grubert A; Ansorge U; Eimer M
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 113(7):2210-9. PubMed ID: 25589587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Category-based guidance of spatial attention during visual search for feature conjunctions.
    Nako R; Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1571-86. PubMed ID: 27213833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scopolamine Reduces Electrophysiological Indices of Distractor Suppression: Evidence from a Contingent Capture Task.
    Laube I; Matthews N; Dean AJ; O'Connell RG; Mattingley JB; Bellgrove MA
    Front Neural Circuits; 2017; 11():99. PubMed ID: 29270112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional selection and suppression in children and adults.
    Sun M; Wang E; Huang J; Zhao C; Guo J; Li D; Sun L; Du B; Ding Y; Song Y
    Dev Sci; 2018 Nov; 21(6):e12684. PubMed ID: 29761932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A temporal dependency account of attentional inhibition in oculomotor control.
    Weaver MD; van Zoest W; Hickey C
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():880-894. PubMed ID: 27836709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting N2pc from anticipatory HbO activity during sustained visuospatial attention: a concurrent fNIRS-ERP study.
    Huang J; Wang F; Ding Y; Niu H; Tian F; Liu H; Song Y
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jun; 113():225-34. PubMed ID: 25818691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of negative attentional set upon target processing in RSVP: an ERP study.
    Zhang D; Zhou X; Martens S
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2604-14. PubMed ID: 19465037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.