These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28686920)

  • 1. Waterberg coal characteristics and SO
    Makgato SS; Chirwa EMN
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Oct; 201():294-302. PubMed ID: 28686920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploring the potential of sulphur forms in Northeastern Indian coals: Implications in environmental remediation and heavy metal sensing.
    Nath M; Gopinathan P; Santosh MS; Subramani T; Ramakrishna V; Khan AA; Ravikumar CR
    Chemosphere; 2023 Oct; 338():139471. PubMed ID: 37442395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of flue gas desulfurization (FGD) installations on emission characteristics of PM
    Li Z; Jiang J; Ma Z; Fajardo OA; Deng J; Duan L
    Environ Pollut; 2017 Nov; 230():655-662. PubMed ID: 28715770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid total sulphur reduction in coal samples using various dilute alkaline leaching reagents under microwave heating: preventing sulphur emissions during coal processing.
    Mketo N; Nomngongo PN; Ngila JC
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Aug; 24(24):19852-19858. PubMed ID: 28687993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ozone monitoring instrument observations of interannual increases in SO2 emissions from Indian coal-fired power plants during 2005-2012.
    Lu Z; Streets DG; de Foy B; Krotkov NA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Dec; 47(24):13993-4000. PubMed ID: 24274462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sulphur in Jharia and Raniganj coalfields: Chemical fractionation and its environmental implications.
    Gopinathan P; Singh AK; Singh PK; Jha M
    Environ Res; 2022 Mar; 204(Pt D):112382. PubMed ID: 34793761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterisation and evaluation of the emissions from the combustion of Orimulsion-400, coal and heavy fuel oil in a thermoelectric power plant.
    Rotatori M; Guerriero E; Sbrilli A; Confessore L; Bianchini M; Marino F; Petrilli L; Allegrini I
    Environ Technol; 2003 Aug; 24(8):1017-23. PubMed ID: 14509393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decadal emission estimates of carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitric oxide emissions from coal burning in electric power generation plants in India.
    Mittal ML; Sharma C; Singh R
    Environ Monit Assess; 2014 Oct; 186(10):6857-66. PubMed ID: 25004854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Control of mercury emissions from stationary coal combustion sources in China: Current status and recommendations.
    Hu Y; Cheng H
    Environ Pollut; 2016 Nov; 218():1209-1221. PubMed ID: 27596303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of Organic Maceral on Biogenic Coalbed Gas Generation from Bituminous Coal.
    Wang A; Shao P
    ACS Omega; 2022 May; 7(21):18139-18145. PubMed ID: 35664615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improvements in SO
    Kuttippurath J; Patel VK; Pathak M; Singh A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Nov; 29(52):78637-78649. PubMed ID: 35696063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The value of health damage due to sulphur dioxide emissions from coal-fired electricity generation in NSW and implications for pollution licences.
    Ewald B
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2018 Jun; 42(3):227-229. PubMed ID: 29644782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigations on desulphurisation of some high-sulphur indian coals by gamma-ray-induced chlorinolysis.
    Tripathi PS; Mishra KK; Roy RR; Tewary DN
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2002 Jun; 56(6):975-84. PubMed ID: 12102360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health and air quality benefits of policies to reduce coal-fired power plant emissions: a case study in North Carolina.
    Li YR; Gibson JM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Sep; 48(17):10019-27. PubMed ID: 25046689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mercury emissions from coal-fired power stations: The current state of the art in the Netherlands.
    Meij R; te Winkel H
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Sep; 368(1):393-6. PubMed ID: 16289297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Characteristics of water soluble inorganic ions in fine particles emitted from coal-fired power plants].
    Duan L; Ma ZZ; Li Z; Jiang JK; Ye ZX
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2015 Mar; 36(3):1117-22. PubMed ID: 25929084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the emission characteristics of trace metals from coal and fuel oil fired power plants and their fate during combustion.
    Reddy MS; Basha S; Joshi HV; Jha B
    J Hazard Mater; 2005 Aug; 123(1-3):242-9. PubMed ID: 15916850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pore Structure and Adsorption Characteristics of Maceral Groups: Insights from Centrifugal Flotation Experiment of Coals.
    Jia T; Zhang S; Tang S; Xin D; Zhang Q; Zhang K
    ACS Omega; 2023 Apr; 8(13):12079-12097. PubMed ID: 37033861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ambient air quality and emission characteristics in and around a non-recovery type coke oven using high sulphur coal.
    Saikia J; Saikia P; Boruah R; Saikia BK
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Oct; 530-531():304-313. PubMed ID: 26047865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implications of near-term coal power plant retirement for SO2 and NOX and life cycle GHG emissions.
    Venkatesh A; Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(18):9838-45. PubMed ID: 22888978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.