These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28687287)
21. A method for characterizing and matching CT image quality across CT scanners from different manufacturers. Winslow J; Zhang Y; Samei E Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5705-5717. PubMed ID: 28865170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quantitation of clinical feedback on image quality differences between two CT scanner models. Bache ST; Stauduhar PJ; Liu X; Loyer EM; John RX J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):163-169. PubMed ID: 28300384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An airway phantom to standardize CT acquisition in multicenter clinical trials. Robinson TE; Long FR; Raman P; Saha P; Emond MJ; Reinhardt JM; Raman R; Brody AS Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1134-41. PubMed ID: 19467609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An evaluation of spatial resolution of a prototype proton CT scanner. Plautz TE; Bashkirov V; Giacometti V; Hurley RF; Johnson RP; Piersimoni P; Sadrozinski HF; Schulte RW; Zatserklyaniy A Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6291. PubMed ID: 27908179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Characteristic image quality of a third generation dual-source MDCT scanner: Noise, resolution, and detectability. Solomon J; Wilson J; Samei E Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4941-53. PubMed ID: 26233220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In vitro high-resolution flat-panel computed tomographic arthrography for artificial cartilage defect detection: comparison with multidetector computed tomography. Guggenberger R; Winklhofer S; Spiczak JV; Andreisek G; Alkadhi H Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):614-21. PubMed ID: 23538888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The impact of x-ray tube stabilization on localized radiation dose in axial CT scans: initial results in CTDI phantoms. Mathieu KB; McNitt-Gray MF; Cody DD Phys Med Biol; 2016 Oct; 61(20):7363-7376. PubMed ID: 27694696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessment of the variation in CT scanner performance (image quality and Hounsfield units) with scan parameters, for image optimisation in radiotherapy treatment planning. Davis AT; Palmer AL; Pani S; Nisbet A Phys Med; 2018 Jan; 45():59-64. PubMed ID: 29472091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Image quality for radiotherapy CT simulators with different scanner bore size. Tomic N; Papaconstadopoulos P; Aldelaijan S; Rajala J; Seuntjens J; Devic S Phys Med; 2018 Jan; 45():65-71. PubMed ID: 29472093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Relating noise to image quality indicators in CT examinations with tube current modulation. Solomon JB; Li X; Samei E AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):592-600. PubMed ID: 23436849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Design and use of a phantom for testing and comparing the performance of computed tomography automatic tube current modulation systems. Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Krisanachinda A J Radiol Prot; 2020 Sep; 40(3):753-773. PubMed ID: 32303017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effective Spatial Resolution of Photon Counting CT for Imaging of Trabecular Structures is Superior to Conventional Clinical CT and Similar to High Resolution Peripheral CT. Thomsen FSL; Horstmeier S; Niehoff JH; Peña JA; Borggrefe J Invest Radiol; 2022 Sep; 57(9):620-626. PubMed ID: 35318968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment of Image Quality and Dosimetric Performance of CT Simulators. Rezaee M; Letourneau D J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Jun; 50(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 31176438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Objective comparison of high-contrast spatial resolution and low-contrast detectability for various clinical protocols on multiple CT scanners. Racine D; Viry A; Becce F; Schmidt S; Ba A; Bochud FO; Edyvean S; Schegerer A; Verdun FR Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):e153-e163. PubMed ID: 28901621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. CT image quality in sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction phantom study - is there a point of diminishing returns? Infante JC; Liu Y; Rigsby CK Pediatr Radiol; 2017 Mar; 47(3):333-341. PubMed ID: 27891546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of different phantom designs for CT scanner automatic tube current modulation system tests. Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Gentle DJ J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):735-61. PubMed ID: 24025482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Toward standardized quantitative image quality (IQ) assessment in computed tomography (CT): A comprehensive framework for automated and comparative IQ analysis based on ICRU Report 87. Pahn G; Skornitzke S; Schlemmer HP; Kauczor HU; Stiller W Phys Med; 2016 Jan; 32(1):104-15. PubMed ID: 26520485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Harmonization of technical image quality in computed tomography: comparison between different reconstruction algorithms and kernels from six scanners. Juntunen MAK; Rautiainen J; Hänninen NE; Kotiaho AO Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2022 Apr; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 35320794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Review of failed CT phantom image evaluations in 2005 and 2006 by the CT accreditation program of the Korean Institute for Accreditation of Medical Image. Park HJ; Jung SE; Lee YJ; Cho WI; Do KH; Kim SH; Na DG Korean J Radiol; 2008; 9(4):354-63. PubMed ID: 18682674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. CT-ED conversion on a GE Lightspeed-RT scanner: influence of scanner settings. Ebert MA; Lambert J; Greer PB Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2008 Jun; 31(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 18697708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]