294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28687866)
1. Quantification, improvement, and harmonization of small lesion detection with state-of-the-art PET.
van der Vos CS; Koopman D; Rijnsdorp S; Arends AJ; Boellaard R; van Dalen JA; Lubberink M; Willemsen ATM; Visser EP
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Aug; 44(Suppl 1):4-16. PubMed ID: 28687866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. SUV Harmonization Between Different Hybrid PET/CT Systems.
Rubello D; Colletti PM
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 43(11):811-814. PubMed ID: 30199381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Harmonizing FDG PET quantification while maintaining optimal lesion detection: prospective multicentre validation in 517 oncology patients.
Quak E; Le Roux PY; Hofman MS; Robin P; Bourhis D; Callahan J; Binns D; Desmonts C; Salaun PY; Hicks RJ; Aide N
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(13):2072-82. PubMed ID: 26219870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of time-of-flight PET on quantification errors in MR imaging-based attenuation correction.
Mehranian A; Zaidi H
J Nucl Med; 2015 Apr; 56(4):635-41. PubMed ID: 25745090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Added Value of Respiratory Gating in Positron Emission Tomography for the Clinical Management of Lung Cancer Patients.
Grootjans W; Rietbergen DDD; van Velden FHP
Semin Nucl Med; 2022 Nov; 52(6):745-758. PubMed ID: 35643531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. EANM/EARL harmonization strategies in PET quantification: from daily practice to multicentre oncological studies.
Aide N; Lasnon C; Veit-Haibach P; Sera T; Sattler B; Boellaard R
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Aug; 44(Suppl 1):17-31. PubMed ID: 28623376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of time-of-flight and point-spread-function in SUV quantification for oncological PET.
Prieto E; Domínguez-Prado I; García-Velloso MJ; Peñuelas I; Richter JÁ; Martí-Climent JM
Clin Nucl Med; 2013 Feb; 38(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 23334123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How to harmonize SUVs obtained by hybrid PET/CT scanners with and without point spread function correction.
Ferretti A; Chondrogiannis S; Rampin L; Bellan E; Marzola MC; Grassetto G; Gusella S; Maffione AM; Gava M; Rubello D
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(23):235010. PubMed ID: 30474620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relative role of motion and PSF compensation in whole-body oncologic PET-MR imaging.
Petibon Y; Huang C; Ouyang J; Reese TG; Li Q; Syrkina A; Chen YL; El Fakhri G
Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):042503. PubMed ID: 24694156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving the detection of small lesions using a state-of-the-art time-of-flight PET/CT system and small-voxel reconstructions.
Koopman D; van Dalen JA; Lagerweij MC; Arkies H; de Boer J; Oostdijk AH; Slump CH; Jager PL
J Nucl Med Technol; 2015 Mar; 43(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 25613334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of whole-body oncologic PET with time-of-flight and point-spread function for the hybrid PET/MR system.
Shang K; Cui B; Ma J; Shuai D; Liang Z; Jansen F; Zhou Y; Lu J; Zhao G
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 93():70-75. PubMed ID: 28668434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Generating harmonized SUV within the EANM EARL accreditation program: software approach versus EARL-compliant reconstruction.
Lasnon C; Salomon T; Desmonts C; Dô P; Oulkhouir Y; Madelaine J; Aide N
Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Feb; 31(2):125-134. PubMed ID: 27812791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improvement of attenuation correction in time-of-flight PET/MR imaging with a positron-emitting source.
Mollet P; Keereman V; Bini J; Izquierdo-Garcia D; Fayad ZA; Vandenberghe S
J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):329-36. PubMed ID: 24434291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital PET compliance to EARL accreditation specifications.
Koopman D; Groot Koerkamp M; Jager PL; Arkies H; Knollema S; Slump CH; Sanches PG; van Dalen JA
EJNMMI Phys; 2017 Dec; 4(1):9. PubMed ID: 28144857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance in Lymphoma: Comparison With 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and With the Addition of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.
Giraudo C; Raderer M; Karanikas G; Weber M; Kiesewetter B; Dolak W; Simonitsch-Klupp I; Mayerhoefer ME
Invest Radiol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26784400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving MR sequence of 18F-FDG PET/MR for diagnosing and staging gastric Cancer: a comparison study to
Zheng D; Liu Y; Liu J; Li K; Lin M; Schmidt H; Xu B; Tian J
Cancer Imaging; 2020 Jun; 20(1):39. PubMed ID: 32546207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Brain partial volume correction with point spreading function reconstruction in high-resolution digital PET: comparison with an MR-based method in FDG imaging.
Ibaraki M; Matsubara K; Shinohara Y; Shidahara M; Sato K; Yamamoto H; Kinoshita T
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Aug; 36(8):717-727. PubMed ID: 35616808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimizing positron emission tomography image acquisition protocols in integrated positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging.
Hartung-Knemeyer V; Beiderwellen KJ; Buchbender C; Kuehl H; Lauenstein TC; Bockisch A; Poeppel TD
Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):290-4. PubMed ID: 23399811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Practical PET Respiratory Motion Correction in Clinical PET/MR.
Manber R; Thielemans K; Hutton BF; Barnes A; Ourselin S; Arridge S; O'Meara C; Wan S; Atkinson D
J Nucl Med; 2015 Jun; 56(6):890-6. PubMed ID: 25952740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
