These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28688329)

  • 1. The role of inoculum's origin on the methane yield of different substrates in biochemical methane potential (BMP) tests.
    Koch K; Lippert T; Drewes JE
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Nov; 243():457-463. PubMed ID: 28688329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biochemical methane potential (BMP) of food waste and primary sludge: influence of inoculum pre-incubation and inoculum source.
    Elbeshbishy E; Nakhla G; Hafez H
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Apr; 110():18-25. PubMed ID: 22342042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of inoculum source and co-digestion strategies on anaerobic digestion of residues generated in the treatment of waste vegetable oils.
    Hidalgo D; Martín-Marroquín JM
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Sep; 142():17-22. PubMed ID: 24794521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Granular sludge is a preferable inoculum for the biochemical methane potential assay for two complex substrates.
    Posmanik R; Kim AH; Labatut RA; Usack JG; Angenent LT
    Bioresour Technol; 2020 Aug; 309():123359. PubMed ID: 32305847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anaerobic co-digestion of cheese whey and septage: Effect of substrate and inoculum on biogas production.
    Bella K; Venkateswara Rao P
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Apr; 308():114581. PubMed ID: 35124319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inoculum selection influences the biochemical methane potential of agro-industrial substrates.
    De Vrieze J; Raport L; Willems B; Verbrugge S; Volcke E; Meers E; Angenent LT; Boon N
    Microb Biotechnol; 2015 Sep; 8(5):776-86. PubMed ID: 25756301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inactivation of enteric indicator bacteria and system stability during dry co-digestion of food waste and pig manure.
    Jiang Y; Dennehy C; Lawlor PG; Hu Z; Zhan X; Gardiner GE
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jan; 612():293-302. PubMed ID: 28850849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of inoculum to substrate ratio, substrate mix ratio and inoculum source on batch co-digestion of grass and pig manure.
    Dechrugsa S; Kantachote D; Chaiprapat S
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Oct; 146():101-108. PubMed ID: 23916981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anaerobic treatment of deinking sludge: Methane production and organic matter degradation.
    Amare DE; Ogun MK; Körner I
    Waste Manag; 2019 Feb; 85():417-424. PubMed ID: 30803596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhanced biogas production by anaerobic co-digestion from a trinary mix substrate over a binary mix substrate.
    Ara E; Sartaj M; Kennedy K
    Waste Manag Res; 2015 Jun; 33(6):578-87. PubMed ID: 25964293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Boosting biogas production from sewage sludge by adding small amount of agro-industrial by-products and food waste residues.
    Maragkaki AE; Fountoulakis M; Kyriakou A; Lasaridi K; Manios T
    Waste Manag; 2018 Jan; 71():605-611. PubMed ID: 28427739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Solid anaerobic digestion: State-of-art, scientific and technological hurdles.
    André L; Pauss A; Ribeiro T
    Bioresour Technol; 2018 Jan; 247():1027-1037. PubMed ID: 28912079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of biochemical methane potential of dairy wastewater with different co-substrates and evaluation of different kinetic models.
    Unal E; Manav-Demir N
    Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Dec; 196(1):21. PubMed ID: 38060054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of anaerobic co-digestion of sewage and brewery sludges on biogas production and sludge quality.
    Pecharaply A; Parkpian P; Annachhatre AP; Jugsujinda A
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2007 Jun; 42(7):911-23. PubMed ID: 17558772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inoculum Source Determines Acetate and Lactate Production during Anaerobic Digestion of Sewage Sludge and Food Waste.
    Moestedt J; Westerholm M; Isaksson S; Schnürer A
    Bioengineering (Basel); 2019 Dec; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 31877953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of solid-liquid separation strategy on biogas yield from a stratified swine production system.
    Cestonaro do Amaral A; Kunz A; Radis Steinmetz RL; Scussiato LA; Tápparo DC; Gaspareto TC
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Mar; 168():229-35. PubMed ID: 26716354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative biochemical methane potential of paragrass using an unacclimated and an acclimated microbial consortium.
    Nuchdang S; Khemkhao M; Techkarnjanaruk S; Phalakornkule C
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 May; 183():111-9. PubMed ID: 25727758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of inoculum composition on the microbial community involved in the anaerobic digestion of sugarcane bagasse.
    Pereira AR; Assis NV; Paranhos AGO; Lima DRS; Baeta BEL; Aquino SF; Silva SQ
    Environ Technol; 2024 Apr; 45(11):2205-2217. PubMed ID: 36632771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the biogas potential of a lignocellulosic residue.
    Guendouz N; Rezzaz-Yazid H; Laib S; Sadaoui Z
    Water Sci Technol; 2021 Oct; 84(8):1827-1838. PubMed ID: 34695013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterizing food waste substrates for co-digestion through biochemical methane potential (BMP) experiments.
    Lisboa MS; Lansing S
    Waste Manag; 2013 Dec; 33(12):2664-9. PubMed ID: 24084104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.