124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28688583)
1. Image improvement method for positron emission mammography.
Slavine NV; Seiler SJ; McColl RW; Lenkinski RE
Phys Med; 2017 Jul; 39():164-173. PubMed ID: 28688583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An iterative deconvolution algorithm for image recovery in clinical CT: A phantom study.
Slavine NV; Guild J; McColl RW; Anderson JA; Oz OK; Lenkinski RE
Phys Med; 2015 Dec; 31(8):903-911. PubMed ID: 26143585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Iterative Image Processing for Early Diagnostic of Beta-Amyloid Plaque Deposition in Pre-Clinical Alzheimer's Disease Studies.
Slavine NV; Kulkarni PV; McColl RW
J Appl Bioinforma Comput Biol; 2017 Aug; 6(2):. PubMed ID: 28932758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Positron emission mammography in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Is maximum PEM uptake value a valuable threshold for malignant breast cancer detection?
Müller FH; Farahati J; Müller AG; Gillman E; Hentschel M
Nuklearmedizin; 2016; 55(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 26627876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical imaging characteristics of the positron emission mammography camera: PEM Flex Solo II.
MacDonald L; Edwards J; Lewellen T; Haseley D; Rogers J; Kinahan P
J Nucl Med; 2009 Oct; 50(10):1666-75. PubMed ID: 19759118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Positron emission mammography with tomographic acquisition using dual planar detectors: initial evaluations.
Smith MF; Raylman RR; Majewski S; Weisenberger AG
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jun; 49(11):2437-52. PubMed ID: 15248588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 3D directional gradient L
Shi Y; Wang Y; Meng F; Zhou J; Wen B; Zhang X; Liu Y; Li L; Li J; Cao X; Kang F; Zhu S
Comput Biol Med; 2023 Jul; 161():107010. PubMed ID: 37235943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Positron Emission Mammography Image Interpretation for Reduced Image Count Levels.
MacDonald LR; Hippe DS; Bender LC; Cotter EW; Voria PR; Hallam PS; Wang CL; Haseley DR; Kelly MM; Parikh JR; Beatty JD; Rogers JV
J Nucl Med; 2016 Mar; 57(3):348-54. PubMed ID: 26635337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An iterative reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis imaging using real data at three radiation doses.
Polat A; Yildirim I
J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(3):347-360. PubMed ID: 29504549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Results of preliminary clinical trials of the positron emission mammography system PEM-I: a dedicated breast imaging system producing glucose metabolic images using FDG.
Murthy K; Aznar M; Thompson CJ; Loutfi A; Lisbona R; Gagnon JH
J Nucl Med; 2000 Nov; 41(11):1851-8. PubMed ID: 11079494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a novel collimator for molecular breast tomosynthesis.
Gilland DR; Welch BL; Lee S; Kross B; Weisenberger AG
Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5740-5748. PubMed ID: 28877351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Newly-Developed Positron Emission Mammography (PEM) Device for the Detection of Small Breast Cancer.
Yanai A; Itoh M; Hirakawa H; Yanai K; Tashiro M; Harada R; Yoshikawa A; Yamamoto S; Ohuchi N; Ishida T
Tohoku J Exp Med; 2018 May; 245(1):13-19. PubMed ID: 29731479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fast 3D-EM reconstruction using Planograms for stationary planar positron emission mammography camera.
Motta A; Guerra AD; Belcari N; Moehrs S; Panetta D; Righi S; Valentini D
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2005 Dec; 29(8):587-96. PubMed ID: 16290284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a mechatronic guidance system for targeted ultrasound-guided biopsy under high-resolution positron emission mammography localization.
Park CKS; Bax JS; Gardi L; Knull E; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2021 Apr; 48(4):1859-1873. PubMed ID: 33577113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the quantitative accuracy of a commercially available positron emission mammography scanner.
Springer A; Mawlawi OR
Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2132-9. PubMed ID: 21626946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigating the limit of detectability of a positron emission mammography device: a phantom study.
Shkumat NA; Springer A; Walker CM; Rohren EM; Yang WT; Adrada BE; Arribas E; Carkaci S; Chuang HH; Santiago L; Mawlawi OR
Med Phys; 2011 Sep; 38(9):5176-85. PubMed ID: 21978062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v.
Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The positron emission mammography/tomography breast imaging and biopsy system (PEM/PET): design, construction and phantom-based measurements.
Raylman RR; Majewski S; Smith MF; Proffitt J; Hammond W; Srinivasan A; McKisson J; Popov V; Weisenberger A; Judy CO; Kross B; Ramasubramanian S; Banta LE; Kinahan PE; Champley K
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(3):637-53. PubMed ID: 18199907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
