These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28688904)

  • 21. Face animacy is not all in the eyes: evidence from contrast chimeras.
    Balas B; Tonsager C
    Perception; 2014; 43(5):355-67. PubMed ID: 25109004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The ups and downs of face perception: evidence for holistic encoding of upright and inverted faces.
    Murray JE
    Perception; 2004; 33(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 15222387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Configural masking of faces: evidence for high-level interactions in face perception.
    Loffler G; Gordon GE; Wilkinson F; Goren D; Wilson HR
    Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(17):2287-97. PubMed ID: 15924942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Features versus context: An approach for precise and detailed detection and delineation of faces and facial features.
    Ding L; Martinez AM
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2010 Nov; 32(11):2022-38. PubMed ID: 20847391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. When context hinders! Learn-test compatibility in face recognition.
    Leder H; Carbon CC
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Feb; 58(2):235-50. PubMed ID: 15903116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Influence of Changes in Size and Proportion of Selected Facial Features (Eyes, Nose, Mouth) on Assessment of Similarity between Female Faces.
    Lewandowski Z
    Coll Antropol; 2015 Sep; 39(3):675-84. PubMed ID: 26898065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Integration of internal and external facial features in 8- to 10-year-old children and adults.
    Meinhardt-Injac B; Persike M; Meinhardt G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jun; 149():96-105. PubMed ID: 24769271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of feature displacement on the perception of well-known faces.
    Hosie JA; Ellis HD; Haig ND
    Perception; 1988; 17(4):461-74. PubMed ID: 3244519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Processing the socially relevant parts of faces.
    Benuzzi F; Pugnaghi M; Meletti S; Lui F; Serafini M; Baraldi P; Nichelli P
    Brain Res Bull; 2007 Oct; 74(5):344-56. PubMed ID: 17845909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The first 100 milliseconds of a face: on the microgenesis of early face processing.
    Carbon CC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Dec; 113(3):859-74. PubMed ID: 22403930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Revisiting the processing of internal and external features of unfamiliar faces: the headscarf effect.
    Megreya AM; Bindemann M
    Perception; 2009; 38(12):1831-48. PubMed ID: 20192132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Internal versus external features in triggering the brain waveforms for conjunction and feature faces in recognition.
    Nie A; Jiang J; Fu Q
    Neuroreport; 2014 Aug; 25(12):965-71. PubMed ID: 25003951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Long-term information and distributed neural activation are relevant for the "internal features advantage" in face processing: electrophysiological and source reconstruction evidence.
    Olivares EI; Saavedra C; Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Iglesias J
    Cortex; 2013; 49(10):2735-47. PubMed ID: 24025156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. 3D faces are recognized more accurately and faster than 2D faces, but with similar inversion effects.
    Eng ZHD; Yick YY; Guo Y; Xu H; Reiner M; Cham TJ; Chen SHA
    Vision Res; 2017 Sep; 138():78-85. PubMed ID: 28687329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A shape-based account for holistic face processing.
    Zhao M; Bülthoff HH; Bülthoff I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(4):584-97. PubMed ID: 26371495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Electrophysiological evidence for parts and wholes in visual face memory.
    Towler J; Eimer M
    Cortex; 2016 Oct; 83():246-58. PubMed ID: 27614900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Same critical features are used for identification of familiarized and unfamiliar faces.
    Abudarham N; Yovel G
    Vision Res; 2019 Apr; 157():105-111. PubMed ID: 29360472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Atypical Face Perception in Autism: A Point of View?
    Morin K; Guy J; Habak C; Wilson HR; Pagani L; Mottron L; Bertone A
    Autism Res; 2015 Oct; 8(5):497-506. PubMed ID: 25683613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces.
    Leder H; Candrian G; Huber O; Bruce V
    Perception; 2001; 30(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 11257979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Young children's difficulty in disregarding information from external features when matching unfamiliar faces.
    Sugimura T
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Oct; 116(2):296-308. PubMed ID: 23896414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.