196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28689263)
1. Variation among Consent Forms for Clinical Whole Exome Sequencing.
Fowler SA; Saunders CJ; Hoffman MA
J Genet Couns; 2018 Feb; 27(1):104-114. PubMed ID: 28689263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The readability of informed consent forms for research studies conducted in South Africa.
Fischer AE; Venter WDF; Collins S; Carman M; Lalla-Edward ST
S Afr Med J; 2021 Feb; 111(2):180-183. PubMed ID: 33944731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shortened consent forms for genome-wide sequencing: Parent and provider perspectives.
Hitchcock EC; Study C; Elliott AM
Mol Genet Genomic Med; 2020 Jul; 8(7):e1254. PubMed ID: 32383361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Understanding variations in secondary findings reporting practices across U.S. genome sequencing laboratories.
Ackerman SL; Koenig BA
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 29131714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Readability of consent forms in veterinary clinical research.
Sobolewski J; Bryan JN; Duval D; O'Kell A; Tate DJ; Webb T; Moore S
J Vet Intern Med; 2019 Mar; 33(2):350-355. PubMed ID: 30793806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Readability of informed consent forms for whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing.
Niemiec E; Vears DF; Borry P; Howard HC
J Community Genet; 2018 Apr; 9(2):143-151. PubMed ID: 28856579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of Length and Readability of Informed Consent Documents for COVID-19 Vaccine Trials.
Emanuel EJ; Boyle CW
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e2110843. PubMed ID: 33909052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the readability statistics of national consent forms in the UK.
Williamson JM; Martin AG
Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Feb; 64(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 20456172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do informed consent documents for chiropractic clinical research studies meet readability level recommendations and contain required elements: a descriptive study.
Twist E; Lawrence DJ; Salsbury SA; Hawk C
Chiropr Man Therap; 2014; 22(1):40. PubMed ID: 25505516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing readability and comprehension of informed consent materials for medical device research: A survey of informed consents from FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
Santel F; Bah I; Kim K; Lin JA; McCracken J; Teme A
Contemp Clin Trials; 2019 Oct; 85():105831. PubMed ID: 31445173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recommendations for the elaboration of diagnostic genetic reports in the clinical setting.
Oriola J; Carrasco P; Díez O; Ezquieta B; ;
Med Clin (Barc); 2019 Oct; 153(7):293-297. PubMed ID: 31395279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Informed consent conversations and documents: A quantitative comparison.
Koyfman SA; Reddy CA; Hizlan S; Leek AC; Kodish AE;
Cancer; 2016 Feb; 122(3):464-9. PubMed ID: 26505269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Consenting of the vulnerable: the informed consent procedure in advanced cancer patients in Mexico.
Verástegui EL
BMC Med Ethics; 2006 Dec; 7():E13. PubMed ID: 17166274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Variation among DNA banking consent forms: points for clinicians to bank on.
Huang SJ; Amendola LM; Sternen DL
J Community Genet; 2022 Aug; 13(4):389-397. PubMed ID: 35834113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors complicating the informed consent process for whole exome sequencing in neonatal and pediatic intensive care units.
Diamonstein CJ
J Genet Couns; 2019 Apr; 28(2):256-262. PubMed ID: 30737856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Readability and Content Assessment of Informed Consent Forms for Medical Procedures in Croatia.
Vučemilo L; Borovečki A
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138017. PubMed ID: 26376183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Kalia SS; Adelman K; Bale SJ; Chung WK; Eng C; Evans JP; Herman GE; Hufnagel SB; Klein TE; Korf BR; McKelvey KD; Ormond KE; Richards CS; Vlangos CN; Watson M; Martin CL; Miller DT
Genet Med; 2017 Feb; 19(2):249-255. PubMed ID: 27854360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low quality and lack of clarity of current informed consent forms in cardiology: how to improve them.
Terranova G; Ferro M; Carpeggiani C; Recchia V; Braga L; Semelka RC; Picano E
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jun; 5(6):649-55. PubMed ID: 22698536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Opt-in for secondary findings as part of diagnostic whole-exome sequencing: Real-life experience from an international diagnostic laboratory.
Brunfeldt M; Kaare M; Saarinen I; Koskenvuo J; Kääriäinen H
Mol Genet Genomic Med; 2023 Aug; 11(8):e2180. PubMed ID: 37025058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Readability of Invasive Procedure Consent Forms.
Eltorai AE; Naqvi SS; Ghanian S; Eberson CP; Weiss AP; Born CT; Daniels AH
Clin Transl Sci; 2015 Dec; 8(6):830-3. PubMed ID: 26678039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
