These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28689263)

  • 1. Variation among Consent Forms for Clinical Whole Exome Sequencing.
    Fowler SA; Saunders CJ; Hoffman MA
    J Genet Couns; 2018 Feb; 27(1):104-114. PubMed ID: 28689263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The readability of informed consent forms for research studies conducted in South Africa.
    Fischer AE; Venter WDF; Collins S; Carman M; Lalla-Edward ST
    S Afr Med J; 2021 Feb; 111(2):180-183. PubMed ID: 33944731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shortened consent forms for genome-wide sequencing: Parent and provider perspectives.
    Hitchcock EC; Study C; Elliott AM
    Mol Genet Genomic Med; 2020 Jul; 8(7):e1254. PubMed ID: 32383361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding variations in secondary findings reporting practices across U.S. genome sequencing laboratories.
    Ackerman SL; Koenig BA
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 29131714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Readability of consent forms in veterinary clinical research.
    Sobolewski J; Bryan JN; Duval D; O'Kell A; Tate DJ; Webb T; Moore S
    J Vet Intern Med; 2019 Mar; 33(2):350-355. PubMed ID: 30793806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Readability of informed consent forms for whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing.
    Niemiec E; Vears DF; Borry P; Howard HC
    J Community Genet; 2018 Apr; 9(2):143-151. PubMed ID: 28856579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of Length and Readability of Informed Consent Documents for COVID-19 Vaccine Trials.
    Emanuel EJ; Boyle CW
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e2110843. PubMed ID: 33909052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the readability statistics of national consent forms in the UK.
    Williamson JM; Martin AG
    Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Feb; 64(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 20456172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do informed consent documents for chiropractic clinical research studies meet readability level recommendations and contain required elements: a descriptive study.
    Twist E; Lawrence DJ; Salsbury SA; Hawk C
    Chiropr Man Therap; 2014; 22(1):40. PubMed ID: 25505516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing readability and comprehension of informed consent materials for medical device research: A survey of informed consents from FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health.
    Santel F; Bah I; Kim K; Lin JA; McCracken J; Teme A
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2019 Oct; 85():105831. PubMed ID: 31445173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recommendations for the elaboration of diagnostic genetic reports in the clinical setting.
    Oriola J; Carrasco P; Díez O; Ezquieta B; ;
    Med Clin (Barc); 2019 Oct; 153(7):293-297. PubMed ID: 31395279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Informed consent conversations and documents: A quantitative comparison.
    Koyfman SA; Reddy CA; Hizlan S; Leek AC; Kodish AE;
    Cancer; 2016 Feb; 122(3):464-9. PubMed ID: 26505269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consenting of the vulnerable: the informed consent procedure in advanced cancer patients in Mexico.
    Verástegui EL
    BMC Med Ethics; 2006 Dec; 7():E13. PubMed ID: 17166274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variation among DNA banking consent forms: points for clinicians to bank on.
    Huang SJ; Amendola LM; Sternen DL
    J Community Genet; 2022 Aug; 13(4):389-397. PubMed ID: 35834113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors complicating the informed consent process for whole exome sequencing in neonatal and pediatic intensive care units.
    Diamonstein CJ
    J Genet Couns; 2019 Apr; 28(2):256-262. PubMed ID: 30737856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Readability and Content Assessment of Informed Consent Forms for Medical Procedures in Croatia.
    Vučemilo L; Borovečki A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138017. PubMed ID: 26376183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
    Kalia SS; Adelman K; Bale SJ; Chung WK; Eng C; Evans JP; Herman GE; Hufnagel SB; Klein TE; Korf BR; McKelvey KD; Ormond KE; Richards CS; Vlangos CN; Watson M; Martin CL; Miller DT
    Genet Med; 2017 Feb; 19(2):249-255. PubMed ID: 27854360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low quality and lack of clarity of current informed consent forms in cardiology: how to improve them.
    Terranova G; Ferro M; Carpeggiani C; Recchia V; Braga L; Semelka RC; Picano E
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jun; 5(6):649-55. PubMed ID: 22698536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Opt-in for secondary findings as part of diagnostic whole-exome sequencing: Real-life experience from an international diagnostic laboratory.
    Brunfeldt M; Kaare M; Saarinen I; Koskenvuo J; Kääriäinen H
    Mol Genet Genomic Med; 2023 Aug; 11(8):e2180. PubMed ID: 37025058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Readability of Invasive Procedure Consent Forms.
    Eltorai AE; Naqvi SS; Ghanian S; Eberson CP; Weiss AP; Born CT; Daniels AH
    Clin Transl Sci; 2015 Dec; 8(6):830-3. PubMed ID: 26678039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.