These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28690572)

  • 21. Judging the morality of utilitarian actions: How poor utilitarian accessibility makes judges irrational.
    Kusev P; van Schaik P; Alzahrani S; Lonigro S; Purser H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1961-1967. PubMed ID: 27119519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On the Wrong Track: Process and Content in Moral Psychology.
    Kahane G
    Mind Lang; 2012 Nov; 27(5):519-545. PubMed ID: 23335831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How to weigh lives. A computational model of moral judgment in multiple-outcome structures.
    Engelmann N; Waldmann MR
    Cognition; 2022 Jan; 218():104910. PubMed ID: 34678683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Counter-intuitive moral judgement following traumatic brain injury.
    Rowley DA; Rogish M; Alexander T; Riggs KJ
    J Neuropsychol; 2018 Jun; 12(2):200-215. PubMed ID: 28168820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. What makes moral dilemma judgments "utilitarian" or "deontological"?
    Gawronski B; Beer JS
    Soc Neurosci; 2017 Dec; 12(6):626-632. PubMed ID: 27745112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The intuitive greater good: Testing the corrective dual process model of moral cognition.
    Bago B; De Neys W
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Oct; 148(10):1782-1801. PubMed ID: 30550336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Gender differences in responses to moral dilemmas: a process dissociation analysis.
    Friesdorf R; Conway P; Gawronski B
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 May; 41(5):696-713. PubMed ID: 25840987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment.
    Greene JD; Morelli SA; Lowenberg K; Nystrom LE; Cohen JD
    Cognition; 2008 Jun; 107(3):1144-54. PubMed ID: 18158145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fickle Judgments in Moral Dilemmas: Time Pressure and Utilitarian Judgments in an Interdependent Culture.
    Hashimoto H; Maeda K; Matsumura K
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():795732. PubMed ID: 35310271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Moral Judgment and Empathic/Deontological Guilt.
    Migliore S; D'Aurizio G; Parisi F; Maffi S; Squitieri B; Curcio G; Mancini F
    Psychol Rep; 2019 Aug; 122(4):1395-1411. PubMed ID: 30025498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Alcohol dependence associated with increased utilitarian moral judgment: a case control study.
    Khemiri L; Guterstam J; Franck J; Jayaram-Lindström N
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e39882. PubMed ID: 22761922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An Asymmetric Effect: Physical and Simulated Confederate's Mere Presence Induce a Preference for Deontological Over Utilitarian Judgment.
    Xu W; Yu X; Guo J; Wang R
    Psychol Rep; 2023 Oct; 126(5):2446-2464. PubMed ID: 35428414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evidence of deontic reasoning in 3- and 4-year-old children.
    Cummins DD
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Nov; 24(6):823-9. PubMed ID: 8961825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Can model-free reinforcement learning explain deontological moral judgments?
    Ayars A
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():232-42. PubMed ID: 26918742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Principles of moral accounting: How our intuitive moral sense balances rights and wrongs.
    Johnson SGB; Ahn J
    Cognition; 2021 Jan; 206():104467. PubMed ID: 33129053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Alcohol, empathy, and morality: acute effects of alcohol consumption on affective empathy and moral decision-making.
    Francis KB; Gummerum M; Ganis G; Howard IS; Terbeck S
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2019 Dec; 236(12):3477-3496. PubMed ID: 31289885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A person-centered approach to moral judgment.
    Uhlmann EL; Pizarro DA; Diermeier D
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Jan; 10(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 25910382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Deontic reasoning reviewed: psychological questions, empirical findings, and current theories.
    Beller S
    Cogn Process; 2010 May; 11(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 19526259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Moral reasoning in women with posttraumatic stress disorder related to childhood abuse.
    Nazarov A; Walaszczyk V; Frewen P; Oremus C; Lanius R; McKinnon MC
    Eur J Psychotraumatol; 2016; 7():31028. PubMed ID: 27837580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of Instrumentality and Personal Force on Deontological and Utilitarian Inclinations in Harm-Related Moral Dilemmas.
    Ludwig J; Reisenzein R; Hiemisch A
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1222. PubMed ID: 32636781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.