These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28691577)

  • 1. Test-potentiated learning: three independent replications, a disconfirmed hypothesis, and an unexpected boundary condition.
    Wissman KT; Rawson KA
    Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):406-414. PubMed ID: 28691577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis.
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):737-46. PubMed ID: 22060276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Test-potentiated learning: distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests.
    Arnold KM; McDermott KB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):940-5. PubMed ID: 22774852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Test-potentiated learning of motor sequences.
    Tempel T; Kubik V
    Memory; 2017 Mar; 25(3):326-334. PubMed ID: 27099043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The roles of encoding strategies and retrieval practice in test-expectancy effects.
    Cho KW; Neely JH
    Memory; 2017 May; 25(5):626-635. PubMed ID: 27348692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reversing the testing effect by feedback: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Pastötter B; Bäuml KH
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 16(3):473-88. PubMed ID: 26857480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A dual memory theory of the testing effect.
    Rickard TC; Pan SC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):847-869. PubMed ID: 28585057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention and the testing effect.
    Mulligan NW; Picklesimer M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):938-50. PubMed ID: 26618913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of testing on subsequent re-encoding and long-term forgetting of action-relevant materials: On the influence of recall type.
    Kubik V; Nilsson LG; Olofsson JK; Jönsson FU
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Oct; 56(5):475-81. PubMed ID: 26243692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retrieval practice: a simple strategy for improving memory after traumatic brain injury.
    Sumowski JF; Wood HG; Chiaravalloti N; Wylie GR; Lengenfelder J; DeLuca J
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2010 Nov; 16(6):1147-50. PubMed ID: 20946709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrieval practice improves memory in survivors of severe traumatic brain injury.
    Sumowski JF; Coyne J; Cohen A; Deluca J
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Feb; 95(2):397-400. PubMed ID: 24231401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diminishing-cues retrieval practice: A memory-enhancing technique that works when regular testing doesn't.
    Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1868-1876. PubMed ID: 28849580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Free recall enhances subsequent learning.
    Arnold KM; McDermott KB
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Jun; 20(3):507-13. PubMed ID: 23297100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: a meta-analytic review of the testing effect.
    Rowland CA
    Psychol Bull; 2014 Nov; 140(6):1432-63. PubMed ID: 25150680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retrieval activates related words more than presentation.
    Hausman H; Rhodes MG
    Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1265-1280. PubMed ID: 29571266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metacognitive control in self-regulated learning: Conditions affecting the choice of restudying versus retrieval practice.
    Toppino TC; LaVan MH; Iaconelli RT
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 29845590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning.
    Karpicke JD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):469-86. PubMed ID: 19883131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval.
    Carpenter SK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19857026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retrieval practice improves memory in multiple sclerosis: clinical application of the testing effect.
    Sumowski JF; Chiaravalloti N; Deluca J
    Neuropsychology; 2010 Mar; 24(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 20230121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Filling in the gaps: using testing and restudy to promote associative learning.
    Bulevich JB; Thomas AK; Parsow C
    Memory; 2016 Oct; 24(9):1267-77. PubMed ID: 26492973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.