These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28692453)

  • 21. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of a Bluetooth-implemented hearing aid on speech recognition performance: subjective and objective measurement.
    Kim MB; Chung WH; Choi J; Hong SH; Cho YS; Park G; Lee S
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2014 Jun; 123(6):395-401. PubMed ID: 24687593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Own voice qualities (OVQ) in hearing-aid users: there is more than just occlusion.
    Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Maas P; Nielsen C
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 21275499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Changes in activation of the auditory cortex following long-term amplification: an fMRI study.
    Hwang JH; Wu CW; Chen JH; Liu TC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Dec; 126(12):1275-80. PubMed ID: 17101588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Speech perception with electric-acoustic stimulation : Comparison with bilateral cochlear implant users in different noise conditions].
    Rader T
    HNO; 2015 Feb; 63(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 25515123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Neural Consequences of Age-Related Hearing Loss.
    Peelle JE; Wingfield A
    Trends Neurosci; 2016 Jul; 39(7):486-497. PubMed ID: 27262177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Previous exposure to intact speech increases intelligibility of its digitally degraded counterpart as a function of stimulus complexity.
    Hakonen M; May PJC; Alho J; Alku P; Jokinen E; Jääskeläinen IP; Tiitinen H
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 125():131-143. PubMed ID: 26477651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Determining perceived sound quality in a simulated hearing aid using the international speech test signal.
    Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC; Moats P
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):533-5. PubMed ID: 21325947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.
    Zeng FG; Liu S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):367-80. PubMed ID: 16671850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Auditory steady-state responses and word recognition scores in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults.
    Dimitrijevic A; John MS; Picton TW
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):68-84. PubMed ID: 14770019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Perceptual effects of noise reduction with respect to personal preference, speech intelligibility, and listening effort.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 22874643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility.
    Qazi OU; van Dijk B; Moonen M; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():79-87. PubMed ID: 23396271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluating the use of an assistive listening device for communication efficiency using the Diapix task: a pilot study.
    McInerney M; Walden P
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2013; 65(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 23711727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Open ear hearing aids in tinnitus therapy: An efficacy comparison with sound generators.
    Parazzini M; Del Bo L; Jastreboff M; Tognola G; Ravazzani P
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):548-53. PubMed ID: 21595527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Speech Auditory Brainstem Response through hearing aid stimulation.
    Bellier L; Veuillet E; Vesson JF; Bouchet P; Caclin A; Thai-Van H
    Hear Res; 2015 Jul; 325():49-54. PubMed ID: 25828076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of a system for enhancing mobile telephone communication for people with hearing loss.
    Moore BCJ; Shaw S; Griffiths S; Stone MA; Sherlock Z
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Jul; 58(7):417-426. PubMed ID: 30957575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Physiologico-acoustic aspects of improving speech perception in sensorineural and conductive hearing loss].
    Moroz BS
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1985; 11(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 4007327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Severe difficulties with word recognition in noise after platinum chemotherapy in childhood, and improvements with open-fitting hearing-aids.
    Einarsson EJ; Petersen H; Wiebe T; Fransson PA; Magnusson M; Moëll C
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Oct; 50(10):642-51. PubMed ID: 21812630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.