These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28692625)
1. A New Craniothoracic Mattress for Immobilization of the Cervical Spine in Critical Care Patients. Holla M; Driessen M; Eggen TGE; Daanen RA; Hosman AJF; Verdonschot N; Hannink G J Trauma Nurs; 2017; 24(4):261-269. PubMed ID: 28692625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reduced tissue-interface pressure and increased comfort on a newly developed soft-layered long spineboard. Hemmes B; Poeze M; Brink PR J Trauma; 2010 Mar; 68(3):593-8. PubMed ID: 19918198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Restriction of Cervical Intervertebral Movement With Different Types of External Immobilizers: A Cadaveric 3D Analysis Study. Holla M; Hannink G; Eggen TGE; Daanen RA; Hosman AJF; Verdonschot N Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Oct; 42(20):E1182-E1189. PubMed ID: 28230622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of unconsciousness during spinal immobilization on tissue-interface pressures: A randomized controlled trial comparing a standard rigid spineboard with a newly developed soft-layered long spineboard. Hemmes B; Brink PR; Poeze M Injury; 2014 Nov; 45(11):1741-6. PubMed ID: 24998039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Transport of severely injured trauma patients in an ambulance with and without a rigid neck orthosis: comparative biomechanical measurements]. Kieninger M; Schneider C; Auer S; Reinker L; Adler I; Dendorfer S; Rosenberger J; Popp D; Eissnert C; Ludsteck D; Cyrus C; Hoffmann J; Morag S; Graf B; Kieninger B Anaesthesiologie; 2024 Oct; 73(10):668-675. PubMed ID: 39317820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Remaining Cervical Spine Movement Under Different Immobilization Techniques. Uzun DD; Jung MK; Weerts J; Münzberg M; Grützner PA; Häske D; Kreinest M Prehosp Disaster Med; 2020 Aug; 35(4):382-387. PubMed ID: 32430091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do cervical collars and cervicothoracic orthoses effectively stabilize the injured cervical spine? A biomechanical investigation. Ivancic PC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E767-74. PubMed ID: 23486409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pain and tissue-interface pressures during spine-board immobilization. Cordell WH; Hollingsworth JC; Olinger ML; Stroman SJ; Nelson DR Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Jul; 26(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7793717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pressure ulcers, indentation marks and pain from cervical spine immobilization with extrication collars and headblocks: An observational study. Ham WH; Schoonhoven L; Schuurmans MJ; Leenen LP Injury; 2016 Sep; 47(9):1924-31. PubMed ID: 27158006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the Vacuum Mattress versus the Spine Board Alone for Immobilization of the Cervical Spine Injured Patient: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study. Prasarn ML; Hyldmo PK; Zdziarski LA; Loewy E; Dubose D; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Dec; 42(24):E1398-E1402. PubMed ID: 28591075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing the Efficacy of Long Spinal Board, Sked Stretcher, and Vacuum Mattress in Cervical Spine Immobilization; a Method-Oriented Experimental Study. Liengswangwong W; Lertviboonluk N; Yuksen C; Laksanamapune T; Limroongreungrat W; Mongkolpichayaruk A; Tharawadeepimuk K; Jamkrajang P; Sook-Oum P; Watcharakitpaisan S Arch Acad Emerg Med; 2023; 11(1):e44. PubMed ID: 37609542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Motion generated in the unstable cervical spine during the application and removal of cervical immobilization collars. Prasarn ML; Conrad B; Del Rossi G; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Jun; 72(6):1609-13. PubMed ID: 22695429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing the Efficacy of Methods for Immobilizing the Cervical Spine. Rahmatalla S; DeShaw J; Stilley J; Denning G; Jennissen C Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jan; 44(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 29916958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Isolated transverse process fractures of the subaxial cervical spine: a clinically insignificant injury or not?: a prospective, longitudinal analysis in a consecutive high-energy blunt trauma population. Schotanus M; van Middendorp JJ; Hosman AJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E965-70. PubMed ID: 20479701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of different techniques for prehospital cervical spine immobilization: Biomechanical measurements with a wireless motion capture system. Morag S; Kieninger M; Eissnert C; Auer S; Dendorfer S; Popp D; Hoffmann J; Kieninger B PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0292300. PubMed ID: 38015902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of spineboard and headblocks on the image quality of head CT scans. Hemmes B; Jeukens CR; Al-Haidari A; Hofman PA; Vd Linden ES; Brink PR; Poeze M Emerg Radiol; 2016 Jun; 23(3):263-8. PubMed ID: 27091739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the flat torso versus the elevated torso shoulder pad removal techniques in a cadaveric cervical spine instability model. Horodyski M; DiPaola CP; DiPaola MJ; Conrad BP; Del Rossi G; Rechtine GR Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(7):687-91. PubMed ID: 19333100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of cervical spine immobilization during patient transport in emergency medical services. Nolte PC; Uzun DD; Häske D; Weerts J; Münzberg M; Rittmann A; Grützner PA; Kreinest M Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg; 2021 Jun; 47(3):719-726. PubMed ID: 31030223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]