These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28693427)

  • 1. Selection bias and subject refusal in a cluster-randomized controlled trial.
    Yang R; Carter BL; Gums TH; Gryzlak BM; Xu Y; Levy BT
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):94. PubMed ID: 28693427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reducing selection bias in a cluster randomized trial in West African villages.
    Kerry SM; Cappuccio FP; Emmett L; Plange-Rhule J; Eastwood JB
    Clin Trials; 2005; 2(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 16279134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Who says "no" to participating in stroke clinical trials and why: an observational study from the Vancouver Stroke Program.
    O'Neill ZR; Deptuck HM; Quong L; Maclean G; Villaluna K; King-Azote P; Sharma M; Butcher K; Hart RG; Field TS
    Trials; 2019 May; 20(1):313. PubMed ID: 31151483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methodological bias in cluster randomised trials.
    Hahn S; Puffer S; Torgerson DJ; Watson J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Mar; 5():10. PubMed ID: 15743523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictors of refusal during a multi-step recruitment process for a randomized controlled trial of arthritis education.
    Blanch DC; Rudd RE; Wright E; Gall V; Katz JN
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Nov; 73(2):280-5. PubMed ID: 18715740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variation in recruitment across sites in a consent-based clinical data registry: lessons from the Canadian Stroke Network.
    Willison DJ; Kapral MK; Peladeau P; Richards JA; Fang J; Silver FL
    BMC Med Ethics; 2006 May; 7():E6. PubMed ID: 16716233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of prior assignment on refusal rates in a trial of supplemental oxygen for retinopathy of prematurity.
    Engel RR; Oden NL; Cohen GR; Phelps DL;
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 20(4):348-59. PubMed ID: 16879508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cluster-randomized trial of a physician/pharmacist collaborative model to improve blood pressure control.
    Carter BL; Coffey CS; Ardery G; Uribe L; Ecklund D; James P; Egan B; Vander Weg M; Chrischilles E; Vaughn T
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2015 May; 8(3):235-43. PubMed ID: 25805647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Who refuses enrollment in cardiac clinical trials?
    Sen Biswas M; Newby LK; Bastian LA; Peterson ED; Sugarman J
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 17715252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of an open design on trial participant recruitment, compliance and retention--a randomized controlled trial comparison with a blinded, placebo-controlled design.
    Avenell A; Grant AM; McGee M; McPherson G; Campbell MK; McGee MA;
    Clin Trials; 2004; 1(6):490-8. PubMed ID: 16279289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient recruitment to a randomized clinical trial of behavioral therapy for chronic heart failure.
    Chang BH; Hendricks AM; Slawsky MT; Locastro JS
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Apr; 4():8. PubMed ID: 15090073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical trial recruitment in rural South Carolina: a comparison of investigators' perceptions and potential participant eligibility.
    Bergeron CD; Foster C; Friedman DB; Tanner A; Kim SH
    Rural Remote Health; 2013; 13(4):2567. PubMed ID: 24325179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Participation bias assessment in a community-based study of myocardial infarction, 2002-2005.
    Gerber Y; Jacobsen SJ; Killian JM; Weston SA; Roger VL
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2007 Aug; 82(8):933-8. PubMed ID: 17673061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Participant informed consent in cluster randomized trials: review.
    Giraudeau B; Caille A; Le Gouge A; Ravaud P
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e40436. PubMed ID: 22792319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reporting participation in epidemiologic studies: a survey of practice.
    Morton LM; Cahill J; Hartge P
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Feb; 163(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 16339049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recruitment bias and characteristics of participants with severe cerebral palsy in a cross-sectional survey.
    Parkes J; Donnelly C; McDowell B; Duffy C
    J Adv Nurs; 2012 Feb; 68(2):368-78. PubMed ID: 21707725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Record linkage research and informed consent: who consents?
    Huang N; Shih SF; Chang HY; Chou YJ
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Feb; 7():18. PubMed ID: 17291357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do patients who take part in stroke research differ from non-participants? Implications for generalizability of results.
    Busija L; Tao LW; Liew D; Weir L; Yan B; Silver G; Davis S; Hand PJ
    Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013; 35(5):483-91. PubMed ID: 23736083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving participation rates by providing choice of participation mode: two randomized controlled trials.
    Heijmans N; van Lieshout J; Wensing M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():29. PubMed ID: 25886757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-participation and adjustment for bias in case-control studies of periodontitis.
    López R; Frydenberg M; Baelum V
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Oct; 116(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 18821981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.