706 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28693479)
1. Pharmacoeconomic analysis of antifungal therapy for primary treatment of invasive candidiasis caused by Candida albicans and non-albicans Candida species.
Ou HT; Lee TY; Chen YC; Charbonneau C
BMC Infect Dis; 2017 Jul; 17(1):481. PubMed ID: 28693479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of anidulafungin for the treatment of candidaemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis.
Auzinger G; Playford EG; Graham CN; Knox HN; Weinstein D; Kantecki M; Schlamm H; Charbonneau C
BMC Infect Dis; 2015 Oct; 15():463. PubMed ID: 26503366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of micafungin versus caspofungin as definitive therapy for candidaemia and invasive candidiasis (IC) in Turkey.
Neoh CF; Senol E; Kara A; Dinleyici EC; Turner SJ; Kong DCM
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2018 Mar; 37(3):537-544. PubMed ID: 29185089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of anidulafungin in confirmed candidaemia and other invasive Candida infections in Spain.
Grau S; Salavert M; Carlos Pozo Laderas J; García Vargas M; Barrueta JA; Mir N
J Mycol Med; 2013 Sep; 23(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 23849341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Epidemiology of candidemia and antifungal susceptibility in invasive Candida species in the Asia-Pacific region.
Wang H; Xu YC; Hsueh PR
Future Microbiol; 2016 Oct; 11():1461-1477. PubMed ID: 27750452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment and prophylaxis of invasive candidiasis with anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin and its impact on use and costs: review of the literature.
Wilke M
Eur J Med Res; 2011 Apr; 16(4):180-6. PubMed ID: 21486732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic evaluation of micafungin versus caspofungin for the treatment of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis.
Neoh CF; Liew D; Slavin MA; Marriott D; Chen SC; Morrissey O; Stewart K; Kong DC
Intern Med J; 2013 Jun; 43(6):668-77. PubMed ID: 23461421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of de-escalation from micafungin versus escalation from fluconazole for invasive candidiasis in China.
Chen D; Wan X; Kruger E; Chen C; Yue X; Wang L; Wu J
J Med Econ; 2018 Mar; 21(3):301-307. PubMed ID: 29303621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. De-escalation from micafungin is a cost-effective alternative to traditional escalation from fluconazole in the treatment of patients with systemic Candida infections.
Masterton RG; Casamayor M; Musingarimi P; van Engen A; Zinck R; Odufowora-Sita O; Odeyemi IA
J Med Econ; 2013 Nov; 16(11):1344-56. PubMed ID: 24003830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Candida and candidaemia. Susceptibility and epidemiology.
Arendrup MC
Dan Med J; 2013 Nov; 60(11):B4698. PubMed ID: 24192246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Resource utilization and cost of treatment with anidulafungin or fluconazole for candidaemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: focus on critically ill patients.
Reboli AC; Rotstein C; Kett DH; Maschio M; Cartier S; Chambers R; Tarallo M
Pharmacoeconomics; 2011 Aug; 29(8):705-17. PubMed ID: 21591820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of anidulafungin versus fluconazole for the treatment of invasive candidiasis.
Neoh CF; Liew D; Slavin M; Marriott D; Chen SC; Morrissey O; Stewart K; Kong DC
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2011 Aug; 66(8):1906-15. PubMed ID: 21628305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness analysis of anidulafungin vs fluconazole for the treatment of invasive candidiasis (IC) in Turkey.
Neoh CF; Senol E; Kara A; Dinleyici EC; Turner SJ; Kong DCM
Mycoses; 2017 Nov; 60(11):714-722. PubMed ID: 28699297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of micafungin in invasive candidiasis caused by common Candida species with special emphasis on non-albicans Candida species.
Cornely OA; Vazquez J; De Waele J; Betts R; Rotstein C; Nucci M; Pappas PG; Ullmann AJ
Mycoses; 2014 Feb; 57(2):79-89. PubMed ID: 23786573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment of invasive candidiasis: between guidelines and daily clinical practice.
Tagliaferri E; Menichetti F
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther; 2015 Jun; 13(6):685-9. PubMed ID: 25818660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-utility analysis of caspofungin and fluconazole for primary treatment of invasive candidiasis and candidemia in Ethiopia.
Gebretekle GB; Fentie AM; Gebremariam GT; Ali EE; Erku DA; Alemayehu T; Abebe W; Sander B
BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Oct; 22(1):1302. PubMed ID: 36309674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness analysis of micafungin versus caspofungin for treatment of systemic Candida infections in the UK.
Sidhu MK; van Engen AK; Kleintjens J; Schoeman O; Palazzo M
Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Aug; 25(8):2049-59. PubMed ID: 19575628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Economic evaluation of micafungin vs. liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) for the treatment of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis (IC).
Neoh CF; Liew D; Slavin MA; Marriott D; Chen SC; Morrissey O; Stewart K; Kong DC
Mycoses; 2013 Sep; 56(5):532-42. PubMed ID: 23496163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcomes by
Locke JB; Pillar CM; Castanheira M; Carvalhaes CG; Andes D; Aram JA; Andrzejewski C; Bartizal K; Das AF; Sandison T; Thompson GR; Pappas PG
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2024 May; 68(5):e0158423. PubMed ID: 38526046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk factors of mortality and comparative in-vitro efficacy of anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin for candidemia.
Lee SC; Lee CW; Shih HJ; Huang SH; Chiou MJ; See LC
J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2014 Jun; 47(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 24246191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
