These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28694122)

  • 21. Testing the risk of bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs.
    Hartling L; Hamm MP; Milne A; Vandermeer B; Santaguida PL; Ansari M; Tsertsvadze A; Hempel S; Shekelle P; Dryden DM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 66(9):973-81. PubMed ID: 22981249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Appraisal of systematic reviews on the management of peri-implant diseases with two methodological tools.
    Faggion CM; Monje A; Wasiak J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2018 Jun; 45(6):754-766. PubMed ID: 29575189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed.
    Whiting P; Savović J; Higgins JP; Caldwell DM; Reeves BC; Shea B; Davies P; Kleijnen J; Churchill R;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():225-34. PubMed ID: 26092286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Risk of bias assessment: (8) Risk of Bias in Systematic Review (ROBIS)].
    Hu J; Sun F; Zhan SY
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Aug; 39(8):1125-1129. PubMed ID: 30180441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses available for bovine and equine veterinarians and quality of abstract reporting: A scoping review.
    Buczinski S; Ferraro S; Vandeweerd JM
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Dec; 161():50-59. PubMed ID: 30466658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. External validation of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR).
    Shea BJ; Bouter LM; Peterson J; Boers M; Andersson N; Ortiz Z; Ramsay T; Bai A; Shukla VK; Grimshaw JM
    PLoS One; 2007 Dec; 2(12):e1350. PubMed ID: 18159233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A new risk of bias checklist applicable to randomized trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews was developed and validated to be used for systematic reviews focusing on drug adverse events.
    Faillie JL; Ferrer P; Gouverneur A; Driot D; Berkemeyer S; Vidal X; Martínez-Zapata MJ; Huerta C; Castells X; Rottenkolber M; Schmiedl S; Sabaté M; Ballarín E; Ibáñez L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():168-175. PubMed ID: 28487158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) showed low interrater reliability and challenges in its application.
    Minozzi S; Cinquini M; Gianola S; Gonzalez-Lorenzo M; Banzi R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 126():37-44. PubMed ID: 32562833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Systematic review found AMSTAR, but not R(evised)-AMSTAR, to have good measurement properties.
    Pieper D; Buechter RB; Li L; Prediger B; Eikermann M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 May; 68(5):574-83. PubMed ID: 25638457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Evidence Project risk of bias tool: assessing study rigor for both randomized and non-randomized intervention studies.
    Kennedy CE; Fonner VA; Armstrong KA; Denison JA; Yeh PT; O'Reilly KR; Sweat MD
    Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):3. PubMed ID: 30606262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.
    Shea BJ; Grimshaw JM; Wells GA; Boers M; Andersson N; Hamel C; Porter AC; Tugwell P; Moher D; Bouter LM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Feb; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17302989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of two different approaches.
    Popovich I; Windsor B; Jordan V; Showell M; Shea B; Farquhar CM
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e50403. PubMed ID: 23300526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Critical Overview of Systematic Reviews of Chemotherapy for Advanced and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer using both AMSTAR2 and ROBIS as Quality Assessment Tools.
    Dang A; Chidirala S; Veeranki P; Vallish BN
    Rev Recent Clin Trials; 2021; 16(2):180-192. PubMed ID: 32875987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A newly developed tool for classifying study designs in systematic reviews of interventions and exposures showed substantial reliability and validity.
    Seo HJ; Kim SY; Lee YJ; Jang BH; Park JE; Sheen SS; Hahn SK
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():200-5. PubMed ID: 26408805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The PEDro scale had acceptably high convergent validity, construct validity, and interrater reliability in evaluating methodological quality of pharmaceutical trials.
    Yamato TP; Maher C; Koes B; Moseley A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():176-181. PubMed ID: 28288916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Safety of intra-articular steroid injections prior to arthroplasty: Best evidence selection and risk of bias considerations.
    Li H; Xing D; Ke Y; Lin J
    Int J Rheum Dis; 2018 May; 21(5):982-991. PubMed ID: 29878619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a prospective study.
    da Costa BR; Beckett B; Diaz A; Resta NM; Johnston BC; Egger M; Jüni P; Armijo-Olivo S
    Syst Rev; 2017 Mar; 6(1):44. PubMed ID: 28253938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research.
    Armijo-Olivo S; Stiles CR; Hagen NA; Biondo PD; Cummings GG
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Feb; 18(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 20698919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies.
    Windsor B; Popovich I; Jordan V; Showell M; Shea B; Farquhar C
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3460-6. PubMed ID: 23034152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.