These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28695156)
1. Extending the concept of weighted CT dose index to elliptical phantoms of various aspect ratios. Markovich A; Morgan AG; Dong FF; Primak AN; Li X J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2017 Jul; 4(3):031205. PubMed ID: 28695156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New weighting factor of weighted CTDI equation for PMMA phantom diameter from 8 to 40 cm: A Monte Carlo study. Haba T; Koyama S; Kinomura Y; Ida Y; Kobayashi M Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6603-6609. PubMed ID: 28960375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the CTDI and AAPM report No. 111 methodology in adult, adolescent, and child head phantoms for MSCT and dental CBCT scanners. Li CL; Thakur Y; Ford NL J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2017 Jul; 4(3):031212. PubMed ID: 28983492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Size-dependent scanning parameters (kVp and mAs) for photon-counting spectral CT system in pediatric imaging: simulation study. Chen H; Danielsson M; Xu C Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jun; 61(11):4105-26. PubMed ID: 27163252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast dose reduction with organ-based, wide-angle tube current modulated CT. Fu W; Sturgeon GM; Agasthya G; Segars WP; Kapadia AJ; Samei E J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2017 Jul; 4(3):031208. PubMed ID: 28804730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ionization chamber dosimetry based on Araki F; Ohno T; Umeno S Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(18):185018. PubMed ID: 30101751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monte Carlo assessment of CT dose equilibration in PMMA and water cylinders with diameters from 6 to 55 cm. Li X; Zhang D; Liu B Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031903. PubMed ID: 23464318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A polynomial approximation to an exponential growth function for calculating equilibrium dose in CT. Weir VJ; Zhang J Phys Med Biol; 2020 Oct; 65(20):20NT01. PubMed ID: 33063694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Attenuation-based estimation of patient size for the purpose of size specific dose estimation in CT. Part I. Development and validation of methods using the CT image. Wang J; Duan X; Christner JA; Leng S; Yu L; McCollough CH Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6764-71. PubMed ID: 23127070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose to water versus dose to medium from cavity theory applied to small animal irradiation with kilovolt x-rays. Vaniqui A; Walters BR; Fonseca GP; Verhaegen F Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(16):165001. PubMed ID: 31252419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CT dose equilibration and energy absorption in polyethylene cylinders with diameters from 6 to 55 cm. Li X; Zhang D; Liu B Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):2882-91. PubMed ID: 26127041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterization of radiation dose from tube current modulated CT examinations with considerations of both patient size and variable tube current. Li X; Yang K; Liu B Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5413-5422. PubMed ID: 28681439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the conversion from dose-to-medium to dose-to-water in heterogeneous phantoms with Acuros XB and Monte Carlo calculations. Delbaere A; Younes T; Vieillevigne L Phys Med Biol; 2019 Oct; 64(19):195016. PubMed ID: 31437832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo and experimental determination of correction factors for gamma knife perfexion small field dosimetry measurements. Zoros E; Moutsatsos A; Pappas EP; Georgiou E; Kollias G; Karaiskos P; Pantelis E Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(18):7532-7555. PubMed ID: 28796643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Determining the optical properties of a gelatin‑TiO(2) phantom at 780 nm. Akarçay HG; Preisser S; Frenz M; Rička J Biomed Opt Express; 2012 Mar; 3(3):418-34. PubMed ID: 22435091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of phantom materials with independently adjustable CT- and MR-contrast at 0.35, 1.5 and 3 T. Elter A; Hellwich E; Dorsch S; Schäfer M; Runz A; Klüter S; Ackermann B; Brons S; Karger CP; Mann P Phys Med Biol; 2021 Feb; 66(4):045013. PubMed ID: 33333496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic investigation on the validity of partition model dosimetry for Hashikin NAA; Yeong CH; Guatelli S; Abdullah BJJ; Ng KH; Malaroda A; Rosenfeld A; Perkins AC Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(18):7342-7356. PubMed ID: 28686171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction factors in proton beams using TOPAS/GEANT4. Baumann KS; Kaupa S; Bach C; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Zink K Phys Med Biol; 2020 Mar; 65(5):055015. PubMed ID: 31962306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correction factors for source strength determination in HDR brachytherapy using the in-phantom method. Ubrich F; Wulff J; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Zink K Z Med Phys; 2014 May; 24(2):138-52. PubMed ID: 24021956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A practical method for quantifying dose in bone and lung using TLDs when using 6 and 15 MV photon beams. Sarigul N; Surucu M; Reft C; Malin M; Yegingil Z; Aydogan B Phys Med Biol; 2020 Mar; 65(5):05NT01. PubMed ID: 32028274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]