These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28695749)

  • 41. Conversion of adult Nucleus® 5 cochlear implant users to the Nucleus® 6 system.
    De Ceulaer G; Swinnen F; Pascoal D; Philips B; Killian M; James C; Govaerts PJ; Dhooge I
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Jul; 16(4):222-32. PubMed ID: 25284643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Using Microphone Technology to Improve Speech Perception in Noise in Children with Cochlear Implants.
    Johnstone PM; Mills KET; Humphrey E; Yeager KR; Jones E; McElligott K; Pierce A; Agrawal S; Froeling C; Little JP
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Oct; 29(9):814-825. PubMed ID: 30278866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluation of a wireless contralateral routing of signal (CROS) device with the Advanced Bionics Naída CI Q90 sound processor.
    Ernst A; Baumgaertel RM; Diez A; Battmer RD
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Jul; 20(4):182-189. PubMed ID: 30821202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Spectral density affects the intelligibility of tone-vocoded speech: Implications for cochlear implant simulations.
    Rosen S; Zhang Y; Speers K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):EL318-23. PubMed ID: 26428833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Speech polar plots for different directionality settings of SONNET cochlear implant processor.
    De Ceulaer G; Pascoal D; Nopp P; Péan V; J Govaerts P
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):299-311. PubMed ID: 31453760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of the benefit for cochlear implantees of two assistive directional microphone systems in an artificial diffuse noise situation.
    van der Beek FB; Soede W; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 17204902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Rate and onset cues can improve cochlear implant synthetic vowel recognition in noise.
    Mc Laughlin M; Reilly RB; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1546-60. PubMed ID: 23464025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Improving Hearing Performance for Cochlear Implant Recipients with Use of a Digital, Wireless, Remote-Microphone, Audio-Streaming Accessory.
    Wolfe J; Morais M; Schafer E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):532-9. PubMed ID: 26134720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Combined spectral and temporal enhancement to improve cochlear-implant speech perception.
    Bhattacharya A; Vandali A; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2951-60. PubMed ID: 22087923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Impact of a moving noise masker on speech perception in cochlear implant users.
    Weissgerber T; Rader T; Baumann U
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126133. PubMed ID: 25970594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Improving speech comprehension using a new cochlear implant speech processor].
    Müller-Deile J; Kortmann T; Hoppe U; Hessel H; Morsnowski A
    HNO; 2009 Jun; 57(6):567-74. PubMed ID: 18685820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Assessment of speech recognition abilities in quiet and in noise: a comparison between self-administered home testing and testing in the clinic for adult cochlear implant users.
    de Graaff F; Huysmans E; Merkus P; Theo Goverts S; Smits C
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):872-880. PubMed ID: 30261772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Single and multiple microphone noise reduction strategies in cochlear implants.
    Kokkinakis K; Azimi B; Hu Y; Friedland DR
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Jun; 16(2):102-16. PubMed ID: 22923425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.
    Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.
    Spriet A; Van Deun L; Eftaxiadis K; Laneau J; Moonen M; van Dijk B; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 17204899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Contribution of formant frequency information to vowel perception in steady-state noise by cochlear implant users.
    Sagi E; Svirsky MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):1027. PubMed ID: 28253672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Speech perception in simulated electric hearing exploits information-bearing acoustic change.
    Stilp CE; Goupell MJ; Kluender KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):EL136-41. PubMed ID: 23363194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Outcome evaluation on cochlear implant users with residual hearing.
    Neben N; Buechner A; Schuessler M; Lenarz T
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Mar; 19(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 29214896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.