223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28696023)
1. MCDA swing weighting and discrete choice experiments for elicitation of patient benefit-risk preferences: a critical assessment.
Tervonen T; Gelhorn H; Sri Bhashyam S; Poon JL; Gries KS; Rentz A; Marsh K
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1483-1491. PubMed ID: 28696023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing Discrete Choice Experiment with Swing Weighting to Estimate Attribute Relative Importance: A Case Study in Lung Cancer Patient Preferences.
Veldwijk J; Smith IP; Oliveri S; Petrocchi S; Smith MY; Lanzoni L; Janssens R; Huys I; de Wit GA; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM
Med Decis Making; 2024 Feb; 44(2):203-216. PubMed ID: 38178591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Discrete choice experiment versus swing-weighting: A head-to-head comparison of diabetic patient preferences for glucose-monitoring devices.
Whichello C; Smith I; Veldwijk J; de Wit GA; Rutten-van Molken MPMH; de Bekker-Grob EW
PLoS One; 2023; 18(7):e0283926. PubMed ID: 37506078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Amplifying Each Patient's Voice: A Systematic Review of Multi-criteria Decision Analyses Involving Patients.
Marsh K; Caro JJ; Hamed A; Zaiser E
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2017 Apr; 15(2):155-162. PubMed ID: 27928659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient Preferences for Lung Cancer Treatments: A Study Protocol for a Preference Survey Using Discrete Choice Experiment and Swing Weighting.
Monzani D; Petrocchi S; Oliveri S; Veldwijk J; Janssens R; Bailo L; Smith MY; Smith I; Schoefs E; Nackaerts K; Vandevelde M; Louis E; Decaluwé H; De Leyn P; Declerck H; Katz EG; Petrella F; Casiraghi M; Durosini I; Galli G; Garassino MC; de Wit GA; Pravettoni G; Huys I
Front Med (Lausanne); 2021; 8():689114. PubMed ID: 34409049
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing Analytic Hierarchy Process and Discrete-Choice Experiment to Elicit Patient Preferences for Treatment Characteristics in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Danner M; Vennedey V; Hiligsmann M; Fauser S; Gross C; Stock S
Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1166-1173. PubMed ID: 28964450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
Harrison M; Milbers K; Hudson M; Bansback N
BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e014719. PubMed ID: 28515194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What matters most to patients with multiple myeloma? A Pan-European patient preference study.
Janssens R; Lang T; Vallejo A; Galinsky J; Morgan K; Plate A; De Ronne C; Verschueren M; Schoefs E; Vanhellemont A; Delforge M; Schjesvold F; Cabezudo E; Vandebroek M; Stevens H; Simoens S; Huys I
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():1027353. PubMed ID: 36523996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Australian Public Preferences for the Funding of New Health Technologies: A Comparison of Discrete Choice and Profile Case Best-Worst Scaling Methods.
Whitty JA; Ratcliffe J; Chen G; Scuffham PA
Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):638-54. PubMed ID: 24713695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Collecting Physicians' Preferences on Medical Devices: Are We Doing It Right? Evidence from Italian Orthopedists Using 2 Different Stated Preference Methods.
Armeni P; Meregaglia M; Borsoi L; Callea G; Torbica A; Benazzo F; Tarricone R
Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):886-900. PubMed ID: 37837325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving the quality of discrete-choice experiments in health: how can we assess validity and reliability?
Janssen EM; Marshall DA; Hauber AB; Bridges JFP
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2017 Dec; 17(6):531-542. PubMed ID: 29058478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preferences for antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis C: a discrete choice experiment.
Mühlbacher AC; Bridges JF; Bethge S; Dintsios CM; Schwalm A; Gerber-Grote A; Nübling M
Eur J Health Econ; 2017 Mar; 18(2):155-165. PubMed ID: 26846922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How do women trade-off benefits and risks in chemotherapy treatment decisions based on gene expression profiling for early-stage breast cancer? A discrete choice experiment.
Marshall DA; Deal K; Bombard Y; Leighl N; MacDonald KV; Trudeau M
BMJ Open; 2016 Jun; 6(6):e010981. PubMed ID: 27256091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. For better or worse? Investigating the validity of best-worst discrete choice experiments in health.
Krucien N; Sicsic J; Ryan M
Health Econ; 2019 Apr; 28(4):572-586. PubMed ID: 30761661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) Questionnaire to Understand Veterans' Preferences for Tobacco Treatment in Primary Care.
Katz DA; Stewart KR; Paez M; Vander Weg MW; Grant KM; Hamlin C; Gaeth G
Patient; 2018 Dec; 11(6):649-663. PubMed ID: 29855976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Systematic Review Comparing the Acceptability, Validity and Concordance of Discrete Choice Experiments and Best-Worst Scaling for Eliciting Preferences in Healthcare.
Whitty JA; Oliveira Gonçalves AS
Patient; 2018 Jun; 11(3):301-317. PubMed ID: 29177797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Suitability of Preference Methods Across the Medical Product Lifecycle: A Multicriteria Decision Analysis.
Veldwijk J; de Bekker-Grob E; Juhaeri J; van Overbeeke E; Tcherny-Lessenot S; Pinto CA; DiSantostefano RL; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM
Value Health; 2023 Apr; 26(4):579-588. PubMed ID: 36509368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Individual Preferences for Child and Adolescent Vaccine Attributes: A Systematic Review of the Stated Preference Literature.
Michaels-Igbokwe C; MacDonald S; Currie GR
Patient; 2017 Dec; 10(6):687-700. PubMed ID: 28474295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are Healthcare Choices Predictable? The Impact of Discrete Choice Experiment Designs and Models.
de Bekker-Grob EW; Swait JD; Kassahun HT; Bliemer MCJ; Jonker MF; Veldwijk J; Cong K; Rose JM; Donkers B
Value Health; 2019 Sep; 22(9):1050-1062. PubMed ID: 31511182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A think aloud study comparing the validity and acceptability of discrete choice and best worst scaling methods.
Whitty JA; Walker R; Golenko X; Ratcliffe J
PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e90635. PubMed ID: 24759637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
