BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28696792)

  • 1. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing and Orphan Drug Development.
    Mason M; Levenson J; Quillin J
    Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2017 Aug; 21(8):456-463. PubMed ID: 28696792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethical imperatives of timely access to orphan drugs: is possible to reconcile economic incentives and patients' health needs?
    Rodriguez-Monguio R; Spargo T; Seoane-Vazquez E
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2017 Jan; 12(1):1. PubMed ID: 28057032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proposed 'grant-and-access' program with price caps could stimulate development of drugs for very rare diseases.
    Valverde AM; Reed SD; Schulman KA
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2012 Nov; 31(11):2528-35. PubMed ID: 23129684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Current landscape of direct-to-consumer genetic testing and its role in ophthalmology: a review.
    Sanfilippo PG; Kearns LS; Wright P; Mackey DA; Hewitt AW
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 43(6):578-90. PubMed ID: 25676199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of the Orphan Drug Act on Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies for rare skin diseases and skin-related cancers.
    Karas L; Lu CY; Agrawal PB; Asgari MM
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2019 Sep; 81(3):867-877. PubMed ID: 31103566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct-to-consumer misleading information on cancer risks calls for an urgent clarification of health genetic testing performed by commercial companies.
    de Pauw A; Schwartz M; Colas C; Golmard L; Stoppa-Lyonnet D
    Eur J Cancer; 2020 Jun; 132():100-103. PubMed ID: 32335476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Finding a Clear Path Forward.
    Seward B
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2018 Jul; 52(4):482-488. PubMed ID: 29714553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.
    Covolo L; Rubinelli S; Ceretti E; Gelatti U
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Dec; 17(12):e279. PubMed ID: 26677835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The economics of orphan drug policy in the US. Can the legislation be improved?
    Peabody JW; Ruby A; Cannon P
    Pharmacoeconomics; 1995 Nov; 8(5):374-84. PubMed ID: 10160072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Value and Risk.
    Majumder MA; Guerrini CJ; McGuire AL
    Annu Rev Med; 2021 Jan; 72():151-166. PubMed ID: 32735764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a systematic review of european guidelines, recommendations, and position statements.
    Rafiq M; Ianuale C; Ricciardi W; Boccia S
    Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2015 Oct; 19(10):535-47. PubMed ID: 26313927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct-to-Consumer Testing 2.0: Emerging Models of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing.
    Allyse MA; Robinson DH; Ferber MJ; Sharp RR
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2018 Jan; 93(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 29304915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What the Orphan Drug Act has done lately for children with rare diseases: a 10-year analysis.
    Thorat C; Xu K; Freeman SN; Bonnel RA; Joseph F; Phillips MI; Imoisili MA
    Pediatrics; 2012 Mar; 129(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 22371464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [European incentives for orphan medicinal products].
    Enzmann H; Lütz J
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2008 May; 51(5):500-8. PubMed ID: 18696141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Public Attitudes Toward Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing.
    Ruhl GL; Hazel JW; Clayton EW; Malin BA
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2019; 2019():774-783. PubMed ID: 32308873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comprehensive study of the rare diseases and conditions targeted by orphan drug designations and approvals over the forty years of the Orphan Drug Act.
    Fermaglich LJ; Miller KL
    Orphanet J Rare Dis; 2023 Jun; 18(1):163. PubMed ID: 37353796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct-to-consumer DNA testing and the GP.
    Trent R
    Aust Fam Physician; 2014 Jul; 43(7):436-9. PubMed ID: 25006602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "Creating hope" and other incentives for drug development for children.
    Connor E; Cure P
    Sci Transl Med; 2011 Jan; 3(66):66cm1. PubMed ID: 21248312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do It Yourself Newborn Screening.
    Borry P; Sénécal K; Knoppers BM
    JAMA Pediatr; 2016 Jun; 170(6):523-4. PubMed ID: 27111240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of the Orphan Drug Act on the development and advancement of neurological products for rare diseases: a descriptive review.
    Burke KA; Freeman SN; Imoisili MA; Coté TR
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Oct; 88(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 20856241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.