These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

438 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28697533)

  • 1. Predictors of operative time during radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
    Simon RM; Howard LE; Moreira DM; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Aronson WJ; Amling CL; Cooperberg MR; Freedland SJ
    Int J Urol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):618-623. PubMed ID: 28697533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Utilization and impact of surgical technique on the performance of pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy: Results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
    McGinley KF; Sun X; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Cooperberg MR; Freedland SJ
    Int J Urol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 26667212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Health Economic Analysis of Open and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Prostate Cancer Within the Prospective Multicentre LAPPRO Trial.
    Forsmark A; Gehrman J; Angenete E; Bjartell A; Björholt I; Carlsson S; Hugosson J; Marlow T; Stinesen-Kollberg K; Stranne J; Wallerstedt A; Wiklund P; Wilderäng U; Haglind E
    Eur Urol; 2018 Dec; 74(6):816-824. PubMed ID: 30143383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study.
    Akand M; Erdogru T; Avci E; Ates M
    Int J Urol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):916-21. PubMed ID: 26212891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multicenter evaluation of guideline adherence for pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing open retropubic vs. laparoscopic or robot assisted radical prostatectomy according to the recent German S3 guideline on prostate cancer.
    Borkowetz A; Bruendl J; Drerup M; Herrmann J; Isbarn H; Beyer B;
    World J Urol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):855-861. PubMed ID: 29427005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short-term results after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared to open radical prostatectomy.
    Wallerstedt A; Tyritzis SI; Thorsteinsdottir T; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Gustafsson O; Hugosson J; Bjartell A; Wilderäng U; Wiklund NP; Steineck G; Haglind E;
    Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):660-70. PubMed ID: 25308968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surgeon and Hospital Level Variation in the Costs of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Cole AP; Leow JJ; Chang SL; Chung BI; Meyer CP; Kibel AS; Menon M; Nguyen PL; Choueiri TK; Reznor G; Lipsitz SR; Sammon JD; Sun M; Trinh QD
    J Urol; 2016 Oct; 196(4):1090-5. PubMed ID: 27157376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patterns-of-care and health economic analysis of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Australian public health system.
    Basto M; Sathianathen N; Te Marvelde L; Ryan S; Goad J; Lawrentschuk N; Costello AJ; Moon DA; Heriot AG; Butler J; Murphy DG
    BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):930-9. PubMed ID: 26350758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of a Patient-Based Model for Estimating Operative Times for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Huben NB; Hussein AA; May PR; Whittum M; Krasowski C; Ahmed YE; Jing Z; Khan H; Kim HL; Schwaab T; Underwood W; Kauffman EC; Mohler JL; Guru KA
    J Endourol; 2018 Aug; 32(8):730-736. PubMed ID: 29631438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study.
    Coughlin GD; Yaxley JW; Chambers SK; Occhipinti S; Samaratunga H; Zajdlewicz L; Teloken P; Dunglison N; Williams S; Lavin MF; Gardiner RA
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1051-1060. PubMed ID: 30017351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Independent predictors of prolonged operative time during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Violette PD; Mikhail D; Pond GR; Pautler SE
    J Robot Surg; 2015 Jun; 9(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 26531111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy after Previous Bladder Outlet Surgery: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Comparative Studies.
    Veccia A; Antonelli A; Francavilla S; Porpiglia F; Simeone C; Lima E; Zargar H; Eun D; Hampton LJ; Autorino R
    J Urol; 2019 Sep; 202(3):511-517. PubMed ID: 31039100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surgeon-led prostate cancer lymph node staging: pathological outcomes stratified by robot-assisted dissection templates and patient selection.
    Altok M; Babaian K; Achim MF; Achim GC; Troncoso P; Matin SF; Chapin BF; Davis JW
    BJU Int; 2018 Jul; 122(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 29446205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Redefining and Contextualizing the Hospital Volume-Outcome Relationship for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Centralization of Care.
    Gershman B; Meier SK; Jeffery MM; Moreira DM; Tollefson MK; Kim SP; Karnes RJ; Shah ND
    J Urol; 2017 Jul; 198(1):92-99. PubMed ID: 28153509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benchmarks for operative outcomes of robotic and open radical prostatectomy: results from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study.
    Alemozaffar M; Sanda M; Yecies D; Mucci LA; Stampfer MJ; Kenfield SA
    Eur Urol; 2015 Mar; 67(3):432-8. PubMed ID: 24582327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multi-Institutional Assessment of Routine Same Day Discharge Surgery for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Ploussard G; Dumonceau O; Thomas L; Benamran D; Parra J; Vaessen C; Skowron O; Rouprêt M; Leclers F
    J Urol; 2020 Nov; 204(5):956-961. PubMed ID: 32379565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pitfalls of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a comparison of positive surgical margins between robotic and laparoscopic surgery.
    Tozawa K; Yasui T; Umemoto Y; Mizuno K; Okada A; Kawai N; Takahashi S; Kohri K
    Int J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):976-9. PubMed ID: 24912809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A multinational, multi-institutional study comparing positive surgical margin rates among 22393 open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients.
    Sooriakumaran P; Srivastava A; Shariat SF; Stricker PD; Ahlering T; Eden CG; Wiklund PN; Sanchez-Salas R; Mottrie A; Lee D; Neal DE; Ghavamian R; Nyirady P; Nilsson A; Carlsson S; Xylinas E; Loidl W; Seitz C; Schramek P; Roehrborn C; Cathelineau X; Skarecky D; Shaw G; Warren A; Delprado WJ; Haynes AM; Steyerberg E; Roobol MJ; Tewari AK
    Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):450-6. PubMed ID: 24290695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robot-assisted Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Contemporary Analysis of an All-payer Discharge Database.
    Leow JJ; Chang SL; Meyer CP; Wang Y; Hanske J; Sammon JD; Cole AP; Preston MA; Dasgupta P; Menon M; Chung BI; Trinh QD
    Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):837-845. PubMed ID: 26874806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.