266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28697638)
1. The effect of SWL and URS on health-related quality of life in proximal ureteral stones.
Ceylan Y; Ucer O; Bozkurt O; Gunlusoy B; Mertoglu O; Zumrutbas AE; Yildiz G; Irer B; Muezzinoglu T; Demir O
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2018 Jun; 27(3):148-152. PubMed ID: 28697638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective randomized study comparing shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi.
Salem HK
Urology; 2009 Dec; 74(6):1216-21. PubMed ID: 19815264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in patients with proximal ureteral stones under the COVID-19 pandemic.
Wang P; Zhan Y; Li J; Liu G; Li Z; Bai S
World J Urol; 2023 Mar; 41(3):797-803. PubMed ID: 36729301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intracorporeal or extracorporeal lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi? Effect of stone size and multiplicity on success rates.
Eden CG; Mark IR; Gupta RR; Eastman J; Shrotri NC; Tiptaft RC
J Endourol; 1998 Aug; 12(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 9726396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of semirigid ureteroscopy, flexible ureteroscopy, and shock wave lithotripsy for initial treatment of 11-20 mm proximal ureteral stones.
Kartal I; Baylan B; Çakıcı MÇ; Sarı S; Selmi V; Ozdemir H; Yalçınkaya F
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2020 Apr; 92(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 32255321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy compared with ureteroscopy for the removal of small distal ureteral stones.
Hautmann S; Friedrich MG; Fernandez S; Steuber T; Hammerer P; Braun PM; Jünemann KP; Huland H
Urol Int; 2004; 73(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 15539843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study.
Youssef RF; El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; El-Tabey NA; El-Hefnawy AS; Eraky I; El-Kenawy MR; El-Kappany HA; Sheir KZ
Urology; 2009 Jun; 73(6):1184-7. PubMed ID: 19362338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of previous SWL on ureterorenoscopy outcomes and optimal timing for ureterorenoscopy after SWL failure in proximal ureteral stones.
Irer B; Sahin MO; Erbatu O; Yildiz A; Ongun S; Cinar O; Cihan A; Sahin M; Sen V; Ucer O; Kizilay F; Bozkurt O;
World J Urol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):769-774. PubMed ID: 31098658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment for extended-mid and distal ureteral stones: SWL or ureteroscopy? Results of a multicenter study.
Hendrikx AJ; Strijbos WE; de Knijff DW; Kums JJ; Doesburg WH; Lemmens WA
J Endourol; 1999 Dec; 13(10):727-33. PubMed ID: 10646679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness comparison of ureteral calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy.
Cone EB; Pareek G; Ursiny M; Eisner B
World J Urol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):161-166. PubMed ID: 27145788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of ureteroscopy (URS) complementary treatment after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy failure with primary URS lithotripsy with holmium laser treatment for proximal ureteral stones larger than10mm.
Yao F; Jiang X; Xie B; Liu N
BMC Urol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):126. PubMed ID: 34517851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Primary ureteroscopy for distal-ureteral stones compared with ureteroscopy after failed extracorporeal lithotripsy.
Tugcu V; Gürbüz G; Aras B; Gurkan L; Otunctemur A; Tasci AI
J Endourol; 2006 Dec; 20(12):1025-9. PubMed ID: 17206896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Total Surface Area Influences Stone Free Outcomes in Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Distal Ureteral Calculi.
Scotland KB; Safaee Ardekani G; Chan JYH; Paterson RF; Chew BH
J Endourol; 2019 Aug; 33(8):661-666. PubMed ID: 30860394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ureteral stones: SWL treatment.
Zanetti G
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Mar; 83(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 21585162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ureteroscopy is more cost effective than shock wave lithotripsy for stone treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Geraghty RM; Jones P; Herrmann TRW; Aboumarzouk O; Somani BK
World J Urol; 2018 Nov; 36(11):1783-1793. PubMed ID: 29730839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective randomized comparison between shockwave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for upper ureteral stones <2 cm: a single center experience.
Kumar A; Nanda B; Kumar N; Kumar R; Vasudeva P; Mohanty NK
J Endourol; 2015 Jan; 29(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 23914770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Patient Satisfaction with Treatment Outcomes between Ureteroscopy and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Proximal Ureteral Stones.
Lee JH; Woo SH; Kim ET; Kim DK; Park J
Korean J Urol; 2010 Nov; 51(11):788-93. PubMed ID: 21165201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in distal ureteral stones.
Gong Z; Li Y; Zhang H; Pan C; Li J; Liu G; Bai S
Urolithiasis; 2023 Jun; 51(1):86. PubMed ID: 37272997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones: a cumulative analysis of comparative studies.
Arcaniolo D; De Sio M; Rassweiler J; Nicholas J; Lima E; Carrieri G; Liatsikos E; Mirone V; Monga M; Autorino R
Urolithiasis; 2017 Dec; 45(6):563-572. PubMed ID: 28233025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of semirigid ureteroscopy with pneumatic lithotripsy for ureteral stone surface area of greater than 30 mm2.
Ather MH; Nazim SM; Sulaiman MN
J Endourol; 2009 Apr; 23(4):619-22. PubMed ID: 19335149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
