These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28697687)

  • 1. The fractions SNARC revisited: Processing fractions on a consistent mental number line.
    Toomarian EY; Hubbard EM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Aug; 71(8):1761-1770. PubMed ID: 28697687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.
    Fattorini E; Pinto M; Merola S; D'Onofrio M; Doricchi F
    Prog Brain Res; 2016; 227():223-56. PubMed ID: 27339014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Holistic or compositional representation of two-digit numbers? Evidence from the distance, magnitude, and SNARC effects in a number-matching task.
    Zhou X; Chen C; Chen L; Dong Q
    Cognition; 2008 Mar; 106(3):1525-36. PubMed ID: 17707788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implicit response-irrelevant number information triggers the SNARC effect: evidence using a neural overlap paradigm.
    Mitchell T; Bull R; Cleland AA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(10):1945-61. PubMed ID: 22524699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Instructional Dependency of SNARC Effects Reveals Flexibility of the Space-Magnitude Association of Nonsymbolic and Symbolic Magnitudes.
    Lee D; Chun J; Cho S
    Perception; 2016 May; 45(5):552-67. PubMed ID: 27151510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of SNARC and distance effects and their relation to mathematical and visuospatial abilities.
    Gibson LC; Maurer D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Oct; 150():301-313. PubMed ID: 27376924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual Differences in Implicit and Explicit Spatial Processing of Fractions.
    Toomarian EY; Meng R; Hubbard EM
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():596. PubMed ID: 31024373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SNARC for numerosities is modulated by comparative instruction (and resembles some non-numerical effects).
    Patro K; Shaki S
    Cogn Process; 2016 May; 17(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 26714804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contrasting left/right codes for response selection must not be necessarily associated with contrasting numerical features to get the SNARC.
    Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lasaponara S; Cestari V; Doricchi F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102887. PubMed ID: 31351325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.
    Leth-Steensen C; Citta R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 26213330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does the spatial-numerical association of response codes effect depend on digits' relative or absolute magnitude? Evidence from a perceptual orientation judgment task.
    Yu S; Li B; Zhang S; Yang T; Jiang T; Chen C; Dong Q
    J Gen Psychol; 2018; 145(4):415-430. PubMed ID: 30457038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automaticity of access to numerical magnitude and its spatial associations: The role of task and number representation.
    Cleland AA; Bull R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):333-348. PubMed ID: 29708369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time dependency of the SNARC effect for different number formats: evidence from saccadic responses.
    Pressigout A; Charvillat A; Mersad K; Doré-Mazars K
    Psychol Res; 2019 Oct; 83(7):1485-1495. PubMed ID: 29633009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of spatial representation of numbers: a study of the SNARC effect in Chinese children.
    Yang T; Chen C; Zhou X; Xu J; Dong Q; Chen C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Jan; 117():1-11. PubMed ID: 24121228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repetition and the SNARC effect with one- and two-digit numbers.
    Tan S; Dixon P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Jun; 65(2):84-97. PubMed ID: 21668090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of time units on the flexibility of the spatial numerical association of response codes effect.
    Zhao T; He X; Zhao X; Huang J; Zhang W; Wu S; Chen Q
    Br J Psychol; 2018 May; 109(2):299-320. PubMed ID: 29044461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SNARC (spatial-numerical association of response codes) meets SPARC (spatial-pitch association of response codes): Automaticity and interdependency in compatibility effects.
    Weis T; Estner B; van Leeuwen C; Lachmann T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1366-83. PubMed ID: 26274895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rational numbers: componential versus holistic representation of fractions in a magnitude comparison task.
    Meert G; Grégoire J; Noël MP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1598-616. PubMed ID: 19123119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The cognitive mechanisms of the SNARC effect: an individual differences approach.
    Viarouge A; Hubbard EM; McCandliss BD
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e95756. PubMed ID: 24760048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceiving numbers does not cause automatic shifts of spatial attention.
    Fattorini E; Pinto M; Rotondaro F; Doricchi F
    Cortex; 2015 Dec; 73():298-316. PubMed ID: 26520681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.