These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28697695)

  • 1. Intonation and Pragmatic Enrichment: How Intonation Constrains Ad Hoc Scalar Inferences.
    Tomlinson JM; Gotzner N; Bott L
    Lang Speech; 2017 Jun; 60(2):200-223. PubMed ID: 28697695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Processing Intonationally Implicated Contrast versus Negation in American English.
    Dennison H; Schafer AJ
    Lang Speech; 2017 Jun; 60(2):174-199. PubMed ID: 28697696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When pitch Accents Encode Speaker Commitment: Evidence from French Intonation.
    Michelas A; Portes C; Champagne-Lavau M
    Lang Speech; 2016 Jun; 59(Pt 2):266-93. PubMed ID: 27363256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Postfocal Downstep in German.
    Kügler F; Féry C
    Lang Speech; 2017 Jun; 60(2):260-288. PubMed ID: 28697697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intonation and Evidentiality in Spanish Polar Interrogatives.
    Escandell-Vidal V
    Lang Speech; 2017 Jun; 60(2):224-241. PubMed ID: 28697698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of pitch location within a speaker's range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex.
    Bishop J; Keating P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1100-12. PubMed ID: 22894229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of tonal onglides in German nuclear pitch accents.
    Ritter S; Grice M
    Lang Speech; 2015 Mar; 58(Pt 1):114-28. PubMed ID: 25935940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are scalar implicatures automatically processed and different for each individual? A mismatch negativity (MMN) study.
    Zhao M; Liu T; Chen G; Chen F
    Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 1599():137-49. PubMed ID: 25542387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Introduction to the Special Section: Intonational constraints on pragmatic inferences.
    Lang Speech; 2017 Jun; 60(2):171-173. PubMed ID: 28697701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental Evidence for the Role of Intonation in Evidential Marking.
    Vanrell MDM; Armstrong ME; Prieto P
    Lang Speech; 2017 Jun; 60(2):242-259. PubMed ID: 28697702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intonation as an encoder of speaker certainty: information and confirmation yes-no questions in Catalan.
    Vanrell Mdel M; Mascaró I; Torres-Tamarit F; Prieto P
    Lang Speech; 2013 Jun; 56(Pt 2):163-90. PubMed ID: 23905279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidential Strength of Intonational Cues and Rational Adaptation to (Un-)Reliable Intonation.
    Roettger TB; Franke M
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Jul; 43(7):e12745. PubMed ID: 31310022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of salience in young children's processing of ad hoc implicatures.
    Yoon EJ; Frank MC
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Oct; 186():99-116. PubMed ID: 31220753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coding pitch differences in voiceless fricatives: Whispered relative to normal speech.
    Heeren WF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3427-38. PubMed ID: 26723300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Four-year-olds incorporate speaker knowledge into pragmatic inferences.
    Kampa A; Papafragou A
    Dev Sci; 2020 May; 23(3):e12920. PubMed ID: 31693776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scalar and ad-hoc pragmatic inferences in children: guess which one is easier.
    Foppolo F; Mazzaggio G; Panzeri F; Surian L
    J Child Lang; 2021 Mar; 48(2):350-372. PubMed ID: 32519623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perspective-taking in deriving implicatures: The listener's perspective is important too.
    Katsos N; de Linares BG; Ostashchenko E; Wilson E
    Cognition; 2023 Dec; 241():105582. PubMed ID: 37678083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Availability of Alternatives and the Processing of Scalar Implicatures: A Visual World Eye-Tracking Study.
    Degen J; Tanenhaus MK
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Jan; 40(1):172-201. PubMed ID: 25807866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What second-language speakers can tell us about pragmatic processing.
    Khorsheed A; Md Rashid S; Nimehchisalem V; Geok Imm L; Price J; Ronderos CR
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263724. PubMed ID: 35180247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pitch accents in context: how listeners process accentuation in referential communication.
    Bögels S; Schriefers H; Vonk W; Chwilla DJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):2022-36. PubMed ID: 21458470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.