866 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28697795)
1. Improved prosthetic hand control with concurrent use of myoelectric and inertial measurements.
Krasoulis A; Kyranou I; Erden MS; Nazarpour K; Vijayakumar S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Jul; 14(1):71. PubMed ID: 28697795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatio-Temporal Inertial Measurements Feature Extraction Improves Hand Movement Pattern Recognition without Electromyography.
Khushaba RN; Krasoulis A; Al-Jumaily A; Nazarpour K
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():2108-2111. PubMed ID: 30440819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A motion-classification strategy based on sEMG-EEG signal combination for upper-limb amputees.
Li X; Samuel OW; Zhang X; Wang H; Fang P; Li G
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Jan; 14(1):2. PubMed ID: 28061779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensor fusion and computer vision for context-aware control of a multi degree-of-freedom prosthesis.
Markovic M; Dosen S; Popovic D; Graimann B; Farina D
J Neural Eng; 2015 Dec; 12(6):066022. PubMed ID: 26529274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transradial Amputee Gesture Classification Using an Optimal Number of sEMG Sensors: An Approach Using ICA Clustering.
Naik GR; Al-Timemy AH; Nguyen HT
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 Aug; 24(8):837-46. PubMed ID: 26394431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multi-Grip Classification-Based Prosthesis Control With Two EMG-IMU Sensors.
Krasoulis A; Vijayakumar S; Nazarpour K
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2020 Feb; 28(2):508-518. PubMed ID: 31841413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Classification of Transient Myoelectric Signals for the Control of Multi-Grasp Hand Prostheses.
Kanitz G; Cipriani C; Edin BB
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2018 Sep; 26(9):1756-1764. PubMed ID: 30072331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Upper Limb Prosthesis Control for High-Level Amputees via Myoelectric Recognition of Leg Gestures.
Lyons KR; Joshi SS; Joshi SS; Lyons KR
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2018 May; 26(5):1056-1066. PubMed ID: 29752241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conditioning and sampling issues of EMG signals in motion recognition of multifunctional myoelectric prostheses.
Li G; Li Y; Yu L; Geng Y
Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Jun; 39(6):1779-87. PubMed ID: 21293972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Study on Interaction Between Temporal and Spatial Information in Classification of EMG Signals for Myoelectric Prostheses.
Menon R; Di Caterina G; Lakany H; Petropoulakis L; Conway BA; Soraghan JJ
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Oct; 25(10):1832-1842. PubMed ID: 28436879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving the Robustness of Myoelectric Pattern Recognition for Upper Limb Prostheses by Covariate Shift Adaptation.
Vidovic MM; Hwang HJ; Amsuss S; Hahne JM; Farina D; Muller KR
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 Sep; 24(9):961-970. PubMed ID: 26513794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of Combined Surface and Intramuscular EMG for Classification of Hand Movements.
Rehman MZU; Gillani SO; Waris A; Jochumsen M; Niazi IK; Kamavuako EN
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():5220-5223. PubMed ID: 30441515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fabric Vest Socket with Embroidered Electrodes for Control of Myoelectric Prosthesis.
Lee S; Jamil B; Kim S; Choi Y
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Feb; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 32098252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the real-time controllability of pattern recognition to conventional myoelectric control for discrete and simultaneous movements.
Young AJ; Smith LH; Rouse EJ; Hargrove LJ
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 11():5. PubMed ID: 24410948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Closed-Loop Multi-Amplitude Control for Robust and Dexterous Performance of Myoelectric Prosthesis.
Markovic M; Varel M; Schweisfurth MA; Schilling AF; Dosen S
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2020 Feb; 28(2):498-507. PubMed ID: 31841418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Resolving the effect of wrist position on myoelectric pattern recognition control.
Adewuyi AA; Hargrove LJ; Kuiken TA
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 May; 14(1):39. PubMed ID: 28472991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Selective classification for improved robustness of myoelectric control under nonideal conditions.
Scheme EJ; Englehart KB; Hudgins BS
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Jun; 58(6):1698-705. PubMed ID: 21317073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of using EMG and mechanical sensors to enhance intent recognition in powered lower limb prostheses.
Young AJ; Kuiken TA; Hargrove LJ
J Neural Eng; 2014 Oct; 11(5):056021. PubMed ID: 25242111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Myoelectric digit action decoding with multi-output, multi-class classification: an offline analysis.
Krasoulis A; Nazarpour K
Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):16872. PubMed ID: 33037253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of EMG pattern recognition for upper limb prosthesis control: a case study in comparison with direct myoelectric control.
Resnik L; Huang HH; Winslow A; Crouch DL; Zhang F; Wolk N
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Mar; 15(1):23. PubMed ID: 29544501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
