These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28697864)
1. Porous-Coated Metaphyseal Sleeves for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Loss in Revision TKA. Watters TS; Martin JR; Levy DL; Yang CC; Kim RH; Dennis DA J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3468-3473. PubMed ID: 28697864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal sleeves provides radiographic ingrowth and stable fixation. Fedorka CJ; Chen AF; Pagnotto MR; Crossett LS; Klatt BA Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 May; 26(5):1500-1505. PubMed ID: 28314891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Revision total knee arthroplasty using metaphyseal sleeves at short-term follow-up. Huang R; Barrazueta G; Ong A; Orozco F; Jafari M; Coyle C; Austin M Orthopedics; 2014 Sep; 37(9):e804-9. PubMed ID: 25350623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cementless Porous-Coated Metaphyseal Sleeves Used for Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Short- to Mid-Term Outcomes. Shen J; Zhang T; Zhang Y; Dong Y; Zhou Y; Guo L Orthop Surg; 2023 Feb; 15(2):488-495. PubMed ID: 36479829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High survival rate at mid-term follow up of porous tantalum cones for bone defects in revision total knee replacement: A 3-11 years follow up report. Rossi SMP; Perticarini L; Ghiara M; Jannelli E; Cortesi L; Benazzo F Knee; 2022 Mar; 35():175-182. PubMed ID: 35349974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metaphyseal Fixation Using Cones and Sleeves for Severe Proximal Tibial Bone Loss. Zitsch BP; Salaymeh JK; Burdyny MR; Buckner BC; Lyden ER; Konigsberg BS; Garvin KL; Hartman CW J Arthroplasty; 2024 Aug; 39(8S1):S256-S262. PubMed ID: 38604279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones for Severe Femoral and Tibial Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty are Reliable for Fixation at Mean 5-Year Follow-Up. Kayani B; Howard LC; Neufeld ME; Greidanus NV; Masri BA; Garbuz DS J Arthroplasty; 2024 Sep; 39(9S2):S374-S379. PubMed ID: 38508344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survivorship of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Heidenreich MJ; Lanting BA; McCalden RW; Naudie DD; Howard JL; MacDonald SJ; Vasarhelyi EM J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jun; 37(6S):S263-S269. PubMed ID: 35257822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Direct, Cementless, Metaphyseal Fixation in Knee Revision Arthroplasty With Sleeves-Short-Term Results. Graichen H; Scior W; Strauch M J Arthroplasty; 2015 Dec; 30(12):2256-9. PubMed ID: 26209287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Distribution of Bone Ongrowth in Metaphyseal Sleeves for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrieval Analysis. Ihekweazu UN; Weitzler L; Wright TM; Padgett DE J Arthroplasty; 2019 Apr; 34(4):760-765. PubMed ID: 30718170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Short-term effectiveness of revision total knee arthroplasty with porous-coated metaphyseal Sleeve and MBT implant]. Guo L; Du Y; Zhang M; Sun J; Jin Z; Peng Y; Shen J; Zhou Y Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 33(3):302-306. PubMed ID: 30874385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of stepped porous titanium metaphyseal sleeves for tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: short term results. Barnett SL; Mayer RR; Gondusky JS; Choi L; Patel JJ; Gorab RS J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1219-24. PubMed ID: 24444570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of varying stem and metaphyseal sleeve size on the primary stability of cementless revision tibial trays used to reconstruct AORI IIA defects. A simulation study. Awadalla M; Al-Dirini RMA; O'Rourke D; Solomon LB; Heldreth M; Taylor M J Orthop Res; 2018 Jul; 36(7):1876-1886. PubMed ID: 29327379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones Improve Outcomes in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty? Bohl DD; Brown NM; McDowell MA; Levine BR; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG; Della Valle CJ J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jan; 33(1):171-177. PubMed ID: 28844630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Metaphyseal Sleeves for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Good Short-Term Outcomes. Bugler KE; Maheshwari R; Ahmed I; Brenkel IJ; Walmsley PJ J Arthroplasty; 2015 Nov; 30(11):1990-4. PubMed ID: 26115984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Management of the bone loss by metaphyseal sleeves in primary and revision knee arthroplasty: clinical experience and outcome after forty three cases. Gill UN; Ahmed N; Noor SS; Memon IA; Memon ZA Int Orthop; 2020 Nov; 44(11):2315-2320. PubMed ID: 32556384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Minimum seven-year follow-up study. Agarwal S; Neogi DS; Morgan-Jones R Knee; 2018 Dec; 25(6):1299-1307. PubMed ID: 30297257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Septic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Treatment of Metaphyseal Bone Defects Using Metaphyseal Sleeves. Klim SM; Amerstorfer F; Bernhardt GA; Sadoghi P; Gruber G; Radl R; Leithner A; Glehr M J Arthroplasty; 2018 Dec; 33(12):3734-3738. PubMed ID: 30224100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]