These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28699210)

  • 1. Driving in search of analyses.
    Simons-Morton B
    Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(24):3763-3771. PubMed ID: 28699210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of near crashes among teen, young adult, and experienced adult drivers using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study.
    Seacrist T; Douglas EC; Huang E; Megariotis J; Prabahar A; Kashem A; Elzarka A; Haber L; MacKinney T; Loeb H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S89-S96. PubMed ID: 29584473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characteristics of Single Vehicle Crashes with a Teen Driver in South Carolina, 2005-2008.
    Shults RA; Bergen G; Smith TJ; Cook L; Kindelberger J; West B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jan; 122():325-331. PubMed ID: 28947072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of quasi-induced exposure representativeness assumption among young drivers.
    Curry AE; Pfeiffer MR; Elliott MR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 May; 17(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 26376230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Critical older driver errors in a national sample of serious U.S. crashes.
    Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jul; 80():211-9. PubMed ID: 25916662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prevalence and characteristics of road traffic injuries among young drivers in Oman, 2009-2011.
    Al Reesi H; Al Maniri A; Adawi SA; Davey J; Armstrong K; Edwards J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):480-7. PubMed ID: 26506986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validating the representativeness assumption of the quasi-induced exposure method using a national representative field observation survey.
    Shen S; Bao S; Zhu M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(2):133-138. PubMed ID: 33566705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Driver crash risk factors and prevalence evaluation using naturalistic driving data.
    Dingus TA; Guo F; Lee S; Antin JF; Perez M; Buchanan-King M; Hankey J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Mar; 113(10):2636-41. PubMed ID: 26903657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In-depth analysis of crash contributing factors and potential ADAS interventions among at-risk drivers using the SHRP 2 naturalistic driving study.
    Seacrist T; Maheshwari J; Sarfare S; Chingas G; Thirkill M; Loeb HS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(sup1):S68-S73. PubMed ID: 34663136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tracking progress in teenage driver crash risk in the United States since the advent of graduated driver licensing programs.
    McCartt AT; Teoh ER
    J Safety Res; 2015 Jun; 53():1-9. PubMed ID: 25933991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Progress in teenage crash risk during the last decade.
    Ferguson SA; Teoh ER; McCartt AT
    J Safety Res; 2007; 38(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 17478184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using the U.S. National Household Travel Survey to estimate the impact of passenger characteristics on young drivers' relative risk of fatal crash involvement.
    Ouimet MC; Simons-Morton BG; Zador PL; Lerner ND; Freedman M; Duncan GD; Wang J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Mar; 42(2):689-94. PubMed ID: 20159095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using naturalistic driving data to explore the association between traffic safety-related events and crash risk at driver level.
    Wu KF; Aguero-Valverde J; Jovanis PP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Nov; 72():210-8. PubMed ID: 25086439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Road safety from the perspective of driver gender and age as related to the injury crash frequency and road scenario.
    Russo F; Biancardo SA; Dell'Acqua G
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 24279963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Crash risk by driver age, gender, and time of day using a new exposure methodology.
    Regev S; Rolison JJ; Moutari S
    J Safety Res; 2018 Sep; 66():131-140. PubMed ID: 30121099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of teen and adult driver crash scenarios in a nationally representative sample of serious crashes.
    McDonald CC; Curry AE; Kandadai V; Sommers MS; Winston FK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Nov; 72():302-8. PubMed ID: 25103321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of naturalistic driving videos of fleet services drivers to estimate driver error and potentially distracting behaviors as risk factors for rear-end versus angle crashes.
    Harland KK; Carney C; McGehee D
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 26760293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Driver behavior analysis on rural 2-lane, 2-way highways using SHRP 2 NDS data.
    Wu J; Xu H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(8):838-843. PubMed ID: 30689397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pregnant driver-associated motor vehicle crashes in North Carolina, 2001-2008.
    Vladutiu CJ; Poole C; Marshall SW; Casteel C; Menard MK; Weiss HB
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jun; 55():165-71. PubMed ID: 23545268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Naturalistic assessment of novice teenage crash experience.
    Lee SE; Simons-Morton BG; Klauer SE; Ouimet MC; Dingus TA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 Jul; 43(4):1472-9. PubMed ID: 21545880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.