These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28699271)

  • 1. Discounting: A practical guide to multilevel analysis of indifference data.
    Young ME
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Jul; 108(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 28699271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discounting: A practical guide to multilevel analysis of choice data.
    Young ME
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Mar; 109(2):293-312. PubMed ID: 29473961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Monte Carlo method for comparing generalized estimating equations to conventional statistical techniques for discounting data.
    Friedel JE; DeHart WB; Foreman AM; Andrew ME
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Mar; 111(2):207-224. PubMed ID: 30677137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The discounting model selector: Statistical software for delay discounting applications.
    Gilroy SP; Franck CT; Hantula DA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 May; 107(3):388-401. PubMed ID: 28467023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An alternative approach to calculating Area-Under-the-Curve (AUC) in delay discounting research.
    Borges AM; Kuang J; Milhorn H; Yi R
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Sep; 106(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 27566660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discounting model selection with area-based measures: A case for numerical integration.
    Gilroy SP; Hantula DA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Mar; 109(2):433-449. PubMed ID: 29498424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A dual-process approach to exploring the role of delay discounting in obesity.
    Price M; Higgs S; Maw J; Lee M
    Physiol Behav; 2016 Aug; 162():46-51. PubMed ID: 26884122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probability and delay discounting of hypothetical sexual outcomes.
    Lawyer SR; Williams SA; Prihodova T; Rollins JD; Lester AC
    Behav Processes; 2010 Jul; 84(3):687-92. PubMed ID: 20385215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing delay discounting rates when using the fill-in-the-blank and multiple-choice methods.
    Weatherly JN; Derenne A
    J Gen Psychol; 2011; 138(4):300-18. PubMed ID: 24836568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discounting of qualitatively different delayed health outcomes in current and never smokers.
    Friedel JE; DeHart WB; Frye CC; Rung JM; Odum AL
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2016 Feb; 24(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 26691848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analytical methods to detect within-individual changes in discounting.
    Landes RD; Pitcock JA; Yi R; Bickel WK
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2010 Apr; 18(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 20384429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accurate characterization of delay discounting: a multiple model approach using approximate Bayesian model selection and a unified discounting measure.
    Franck CT; Koffarnus MN; House LL; Bickel WK
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jan; 103(1):218-33. PubMed ID: 25556903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robustness of fit indices to outliers and leverage observations in structural equation modeling.
    Yuan KH; Zhong X
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Jun; 18(2):121-36. PubMed ID: 23527606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The combined effects of delay and probability in discounting.
    Yi R; de la Piedad X; Bickel WK
    Behav Processes; 2006 Sep; 73(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 16759821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A practical guide to multilevel modeling.
    Peugh JL
    J Sch Psychol; 2010 Feb; 48(1):85-112. PubMed ID: 20006989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling sparsely clustered data: design-based, model-based, and single-level methods.
    McNeish DM
    Psychol Methods; 2014 Dec; 19(4):552-63. PubMed ID: 25110903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parameters of delay discounting assessment: number of trials, effort, and sequential effects.
    Robles E; Vargas PA
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):285-90. PubMed ID: 18222614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Heroin delay discounting: Modulation by pharmacological state, drug-use impulsivity, and intelligence.
    Stoltman JJ; Woodcock EA; Lister JJ; Lundahl LH; Greenwald MK
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2015 Dec; 23(6):455-63. PubMed ID: 26595426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-month stability of delay and probability discounting measures.
    Ohmura Y; Takahashi T; Kitamura N; Wehr P
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2006 Aug; 14(3):318-28. PubMed ID: 16893275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing hyperbolic, delay-amount sensitivity and present-bias models of delay discounting.
    Mitchell SH; Wilson VB; Karalunas SL
    Behav Processes; 2015 May; 114():52-62. PubMed ID: 25796454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.