176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28700485)
1. Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of solid lesions of pancreas (SLP): A systematic review and a meta-analysis.
Ran L; Zhao W; Zhao Y; Bu H
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jul; 96(28):e7463. PubMed ID: 28700485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography for differentiating mass-forming pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis.
Yang J; Huang J; Zhang Y; Zeng K; Liao M; Jiang Z; Bao W; Lu Q
Chin Med J (Engl); 2023 Sep; 136(17):2028-2036. PubMed ID: 36728948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for differential diagnosis of pancreatic mass lesions: a meta-analysis.
Lin LZ; Li F; Liu Y; Xing LX; Du LF
Med Ultrason; 2016 Jun; 18(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 27239649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for pancreatic neoplasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li XZ; Song J; Sun ZX; Yang YY; Wang H
Dig Liver Dis; 2018 Feb; 50(2):132-138. PubMed ID: 29162410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Value of Low-Mechanical-Index Contrast-Enhanced Transabdominal Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-analysis.
Yamashita Y; Shimokawa T; Ashida R; Dietrich CF; D'Onofrio M; Hirooka Y; Kudo M; Mori H; Sofuni A; Kitano M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Dec; 47(12):3315-3322. PubMed ID: 34465494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang J; Zhao R; Cheng J
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Apr; 149():110219. PubMed ID: 35228171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (ECEUS) for the differentiation of pancreatic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
D'Onofrio M; Biagioli E; Gerardi C; Canestrini S; Rulli E; Crosara S; De Robertis R; Floriani I
Ultraschall Med; 2014 Dec; 35(6):515-21. PubMed ID: 25226455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Hu Q; Wang XY; Zhu SY; Kang LK; Xiao YJ; Zheng HY
Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 24436445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: a meta-analysis].
Jiang H; Chen J; Jiang JJ; Ye Z
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 20(11):828-32. PubMed ID: 23206301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma: A meta-analysis.
Geng J; Tang J
Exp Ther Med; 2018 Dec; 16(6):5310-5314. PubMed ID: 30542488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic value of liver contrast-enhanced ultrasound in early hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhang Z; Ma C; Luo Y
J Gastrointest Oncol; 2023 Apr; 14(2):626-635. PubMed ID: 37201077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Renal Cancer and in Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: A Meta-analysis.
Zhang F; Li R; Li G; Jin L; Shi Q; Du L
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Apr; 38(4):903-914. PubMed ID: 30203542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrasound diagnosis of pancreatic solid tumors.
Sofuni A; Tsuchiya T; Itoi T
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2020 Jul; 47(3):359-376. PubMed ID: 31420821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.
Wang C; Yu C; Yang F; Yang G
Tumour Biol; 2014 Jul; 35(7):6343-50. PubMed ID: 24659450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Detection of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis.
Tufano A; Rosati D; Moriconi M; Santarelli V; Canale V; Salciccia S; Sciarra A; Franco G; Cantisani V; Di Pierro GB
Curr Oncol; 2024 Feb; 31(2):818-827. PubMed ID: 38392054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue® (sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles) compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the characterisation of focal liver lesions and detection of liver metastases: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Westwood M; Joore M; Grutters J; Redekop K; Armstrong N; Lee K; Gloy V; Raatz H; Misso K; Severens J; Kleijnen J
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(16):1-243. PubMed ID: 23611316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic efficacy of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer under percutaneous contrast-enhanced ultrasound: An updated meta-analysis.
Deng H; Lei J; Jin L; Shi H
Thorac Cancer; 2021 Nov; 12(21):2849-2856. PubMed ID: 34605207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ding Y; Peng Y; Zhang J; Pan X; Huang X; Zhang CQ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Apr; 103(15):e37768. PubMed ID: 38608080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Versus Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography for Assessment of Residual Tumor From Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Transarterial Chemoembolization: A Meta-analysis.
Zhong J; Su Z; Zhang Y; Zhang H; Lin P; Tang X; Zheng R
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1881-1890. PubMed ID: 29380404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound enhancement patterns for differentiating solid pancreatic lesions.
Wang Y; Li G; Yan K; Fan Z; Long R; Shan J; Dai Y; Wu W
Eur Radiol; 2022 Mar; 32(3):2060-2069. PubMed ID: 34716476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
