These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2870109)

  • 1. Cefotetan compared with gentamicin and tinidazole in acute abdominal surgery.
    Tanner AG; Thom BT; Strachan CJ
    J Hosp Infect; 1986 Jan; 7(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 2870109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of short-term antibiotic cover with a third-generation cephalosporin against conventional five-day therapy using metronidazole with an aminoglycoside in emergency and complicated colorectal surgery.
    Tudor RG; Haynes I; Youngs DJ; Burdon DW; Keighley MR
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1988 Jan; 31(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 3163301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single dose intra-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis during prostatectomy: gentamicin compared with cefotetan.
    Leach RD
    J Hosp Infect; 1986 Nov; 8(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 2878030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study of netilmicin/tinidazole versus netilmicin/clindamycin in the treatment of severe abdominal infections.
    Henning C; Medén-Britth G; Frölander F; Karlsson J; Dornbusch K
    Scand J Infect Dis; 1984; 16(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 6494811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cefotetan in the treatment of serious intra-abdominal sepsis: a controlled clinical trial.
    Scott SD; Karran SJ
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Res; 1987; 7(3):229-31. PubMed ID: 3298087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Successful prophylaxis with tinidazole of infection after major head and neck surgery for malignant disease.
    Sweeney G; Watson JD; McGregor IA; Sleigh JD
    Br J Plast Surg; 1984 Jan; 37(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 6362760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative toxicity of gentamicin and cefotetan.
    Trollfors B; Norrby R; Bergmark J; Hultberg B; Linderholm H
    Scand J Infect Dis; 1986; 18(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 3518049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Management of severe intra-abdominal sepsis: single agent antibiotic therapy with cefotetan versus combination therapy with ampicillin, gentamicin and metronidazole.
    Huizinga WK; Baker LW; Kadwa H; van den Ende J; Francis AJ; Francis GM
    Br J Surg; 1988 Nov; 75(11):1134-8. PubMed ID: 3061561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Infection after elective colorectal surgery: bacteriological analysis of failures in a randomized trial of cefotetan vs. ertapenem prophylaxis.
    Goldstein EJ; Citron DM; Merriam CV; Abramson MA
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2009 Apr; 10(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 19226203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical trial of prophylaxis of wound sepsis in elective colorectal surgery. Cephamandole with tinidazole versus tinidazole alone.
    Med J Aust; 1983 Oct; 2(9):440-3. PubMed ID: 6355795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical trial of prophylaxis of wound sepsis in elective colorectal surgery comparing ticarcillin with tinidazole. University of Melbourne Colorectal Group.
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1986 Mar; 56(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 2872878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A 12 year study of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in intra-abdominal and postsurgical abdominal wound infections.
    Brook I
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Nov; 169(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 2683149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wound sepsis after colorectal surgery: the effect of cefotetan lavage.
    Greig J; Morran C; Gunn R; Mason B; Sleigh D; McArdle C
    Chemioterapia; 1987 Jun; 6(2 Suppl):595-6. PubMed ID: 3334638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tinidazole--microbiology, pharmacology and efficacy in anaerobic infections.
    Nord CE; Kager L
    Infection; 1983; 11(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 6341253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tinidazole prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery.
    Laitinen S; Ståhlberg M; Kairaluoma MI
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1984 Nov; 19(8):1027-30. PubMed ID: 6533776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tinidazole in the prophylaxis and treatment of anaerobic infection.
    Appelbaum PC; Moodley J; Chatterton SA; Cowan DB; Africa CW
    Chemotherapy; 1980; 26(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 7363709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tinidazole and doxycycline compared to doxycycline alone as prophylactic antimicrobial agents in elective colorectal surgery.
    Viddal KO; Semb LS
    Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl; 1980; 59():21-4. PubMed ID: 6988947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of cefotetan and cephazolin for prophylaxis against wound infection after elective cholecystectomy.
    Drumm J; Donovan IA; Wise R
    J Hosp Infect; 1985 Sep; 6(3):277-80. PubMed ID: 2865292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tinidazole and doxycycline as antimicrobials in elective colorectal surgery. A randomized multicentre trial.
    Ofstad E; Brabrand G; Helsingen N; Uggerud R; Jørgensen J; Lien E; Sandvik F; Foss J; Danielsen S; Garberg O; Trovåg A
    Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl; 1980; 59():29-35. PubMed ID: 6988949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of cefotetan and cefoxitin prophylaxis for abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy.
    Berkeley AS; Freedman KS; Ledger WJ; Orr JW; Benigno BB; Gordon SF; McGregor JA; Galask RP; Sevin BU
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 158(3 Pt 2):706-9. PubMed ID: 3128112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.