These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28701559)

  • 1. Optimal background matching camouflage.
    Michalis C; Scott-Samuel NE; Gibson DP; Cuthill IC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2017 Jul; 284(1858):. PubMed ID: 28701559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Generalist camouflage can be more successful than microhabitat specialisation in natural environments.
    Briolat ES; Arenas LM; Hughes AE; Liggins E; Stevens M
    BMC Ecol Evol; 2021 Aug; 21(1):151. PubMed ID: 34344323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disruptive coloration provides camouflage independent of background matching.
    Schaefer HM; Stobbe N
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Oct; 273(1600):2427-32. PubMed ID: 16959631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disruptive coloration and background pattern matching.
    Cuthill IC; Stevens M; Sheppard J; Maddocks T; Párraga CA; Troscianko TS
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7029):72-4. PubMed ID: 15744301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Background matching and disruptive coloration as habitat-specific strategies for camouflage.
    Price N; Green S; Troscianko J; Tregenza T; Stevens M
    Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):7840. PubMed ID: 31127182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Disruptive contrast in animal camouflage.
    Stevens M; Cuthill IC; Windsor AM; Walker HJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Oct; 273(1600):2433-8. PubMed ID: 16959632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phenotype-environment matching in sand fleas.
    Stevens M; Broderick AC; Godley BJ; Lown AE; Troscianko J; Weber N; Weber SB
    Biol Lett; 2015 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 26268993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Background complexity can mitigate poor camouflage.
    Rowe ZW; Austin DJD; Chippington N; Flynn W; Starkey F; Wightman EJ; Scott-Samuel NE; Cuthill IC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Nov; 288(1963):20212029. PubMed ID: 34814749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantifying camouflage: how to predict detectability from appearance.
    Troscianko J; Skelhorn J; Stevens M
    BMC Evol Biol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):7. PubMed ID: 28056761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimizing countershading camouflage.
    Cuthill IC; Sanghera NS; Penacchio O; Lovell PG; Ruxton GD; Harris JM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Nov; 113(46):13093-13097. PubMed ID: 27807134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disruptive camouflage impairs object recognition.
    Webster RJ; Hassall C; Herdman CM; Godin JG; Sherratt TN
    Biol Lett; 2013; 9(6):20130501. PubMed ID: 24152693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Background-matching and disruptive coloration, and the evolution of cryptic coloration.
    Merilaita S; Lind J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Mar; 272(1563):665-70. PubMed ID: 15817442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Camouflage in lichen moths: Field predation experiments and avian vision modelling demonstrate the importance of wing pattern elements and background for survival.
    Mark CJ; O'Hanlon JC; Holwell GI
    J Anim Ecol; 2022 Dec; 91(12):2358-2369. PubMed ID: 36169598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Defeating crypsis: detection and learning of camouflage strategies.
    Troscianko J; Lown AE; Hughes AE; Stevens M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e73733. PubMed ID: 24040046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Camouflage strategies interfere differently with observer search images.
    Troscianko J; Skelhorn J; Stevens M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Sep; 285(1886):. PubMed ID: 30185636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The predation costs of symmetrical cryptic coloration.
    Cuthill IC; Hiby E; Lloyd E
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 May; 273(1591):1267-71. PubMed ID: 16720401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coincident disruptive coloration.
    Cuthill IC; Székely A
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2009 Feb; 364(1516):489-96. PubMed ID: 18990668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Camouflage using three-dimensional surface disruption.
    King J; Hemmi JM; Kelley JL
    Biol Lett; 2023 Aug; 19(8):20220596. PubMed ID: 37528728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evolutionary fine-tuning of background-matching camouflage among geographical populations in the sandy beach tiger beetle.
    Yamamoto N; Sota T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Dec; 287(1941):20202315. PubMed ID: 33323087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How conspicuous are peacock eyespots and other colorful feathers in the eyes of mammalian predators?
    Kane SA; Wang Y; Fang R; Lu Y; Dakin R
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0210924. PubMed ID: 31017903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.