These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28702922)

  • 1. Public expenditure and healthcare utilization: the case of reproductive health care in India.
    Das D
    Int J Health Econ Manag; 2017 Dec; 17(4):473-494. PubMed ID: 28702922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. EFFECT OF INDIVIDUAL AND COMMUNITY FACTORS ON MATERNAL HEALTH CARE SERVICE USE IN INDIA: A MULTILEVEL APPROACH.
    Yadav A; Kesarwani R
    J Biosoc Sci; 2016 Jan; 48(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 25741587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of previous utilization and out-of-pocket expenditure on subsequent utilization of a state led public-private partnership scheme "Chiranjeevi Yojana" to promote facility births in Gujarat, India.
    Yasobant S; Shewade HD; Vora KS; Annerstedt KS; Isaakidis P; Dholakia NB; Mavalankar DV
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Apr; 17(1):302. PubMed ID: 28441941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Out of pocket expenditure to deliver at public health facilities in India: a cross sectional analysis.
    Issac A; Chatterjee S; Srivastava A; Bhattacharyya S
    Reprod Health; 2016 Aug; 13(1):99. PubMed ID: 27557904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost of hospitalization for childbirth in India: how equitable it is in the post-NRHM era?
    Tripathy JP; Shewade HD; Mishra S; Kumar AMV; Harries AD
    BMC Res Notes; 2017 Aug; 10(1):409. PubMed ID: 28810897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictors of maternal health services utilization by poor, rural women: a comparative study in Indian States of Gujarat and Tamil Nadu.
    Vora KS; Koblinsky SA; Koblinsky MA
    J Health Popul Nutr; 2015 Jul; 33():9. PubMed ID: 26825416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Utilizing maternal healthcare services: are female-headed households faring poorly?
    Ghatak S; Dutta M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2024 Apr; 24(1):299. PubMed ID: 38649989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Out-of-pocket expenditure on prenatal and natal care post Janani Suraksha Yojana: a case from Rajasthan, India.
    Govil D; Purohit N; Gupta SD; Mohanty SK
    J Health Popul Nutr; 2016 May; 35():15. PubMed ID: 27207164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Out-of-pocket expenditure on institutional delivery in India.
    Mohanty SK; Srivastava A
    Health Policy Plan; 2013 May; 28(3):247-62. PubMed ID: 22709923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of Universal Healthcare Coverage in a District of North India: A Rapid Cross-Sectional Survey Using Tablet Computers.
    Singh T; Roy P; Jamir L; Gupta S; Kaur N; Jain DK; Kumar R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157831. PubMed ID: 27351743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utilization of maternal health care services in Southern India.
    Navaneetham K; Dharmalingam A
    Soc Sci Med; 2002 Nov; 55(10):1849-69. PubMed ID: 12383469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 'The money is important but all women anyway go to hospital for childbirth nowadays' - a qualitative exploration of why women participate in a conditional cash transfer program to promote institutional deliveries in Madhya Pradesh, India.
    Sidney K; Tolhurst R; Jehan K; Diwan V; De Costa A
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Mar; 16():47. PubMed ID: 26944258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of an employment guarantee scheme on utilisation of maternal healthcare services: Results from a natural experiment in India.
    Parmar D; Banerjee A
    Soc Sci Med; 2019 Feb; 222():285-293. PubMed ID: 30677642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why not? Understanding the spatial clustering of private facility-based delivery and financial reasons for homebirths in Nigeria.
    Wong KLM; Radovich E; Owolabi OO; Campbell OMR; Brady OJ; Lynch CA; Benova L
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jun; 18(1):397. PubMed ID: 29859092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do we provide affordable, accessible and administrable health care? An assessment of SES differential in out of pocket expenditure on delivery care in India.
    Pradhan J; Dwivedi R
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2017 Mar; 11():69-78. PubMed ID: 28159131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The availability of emergency obstetric care in the context of the JSY cash transfer programme in Madhya Pradesh, India.
    Sabde Y; Diwan V; Randive B; Chaturvedi S; Sidney K; Salazar M; De Costa A
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 May; 16(1):116. PubMed ID: 27193837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Out-of-pocket expenses for maternity care in rural Bangladesh: a public-private comparison.
    Rahman M; Rob U; Noor FR; Bellows B
    Int Q Community Health Educ; 2012-2013; 33(2):143-57. PubMed ID: 23661416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Costs incurred and determinants of out-of-pocket payments for child delivery care in India: Evidence from a nationally representative household survey.
    Krishnamoorthy Y; Ganesh K; Sakthivel M; Priyan S; Rehman T; Surendran G
    Int J Health Plann Manage; 2020 Jan; 35(1):e167-e177. PubMed ID: 31709605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Progress in the utilization of antenatal and delivery care services in Bangladesh: where does the equity gap lie?
    Pulok MH; Sabah MN; Uddin J; Enemark U
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Jul; 16(1):200. PubMed ID: 27473150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does equity in healthcare spending exist among Indian states? Explaining regional variations from national sample survey data.
    Dwivedi R; Pradhan J
    Int J Equity Health; 2017 Jan; 16(1):15. PubMed ID: 28088198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.