BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28704312)

  • 1. Trunk Muscle Activation in the Back and Hack Squat at the Same Relative Loads.
    Clark DR; Lambert MI; Hunter AM
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Jul; 33 Suppl 1():S60-S69. PubMed ID: 28704312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of resistance training status on trunk muscle activation in a fatiguing set of heavy back squats.
    Clark DR; Lambert MI; Grigson C; Hunter AM
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2021 Feb; 121(2):597-608. PubMed ID: 33206252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electromyographic and kinetic comparison of the back squat and overhead squat.
    Aspe RR; Swinton PA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Oct; 28(10):2827-36. PubMed ID: 24662228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Load-Velocity Relationships of the Back vs. Front Squat Exercises in Resistance-Trained Men.
    Spitz RW; Gonzalez AM; Ghigiarelli JJ; Sell KM; Mangine GT
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Feb; 33(2):301-306. PubMed ID: 30688871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changing the stability conditions in a back squat: the effect on maximum load lifted and erector spinae muscle activity.
    Fletcher IM; Bagley A
    Sports Biomech; 2014 Nov; 13(4):380-90. PubMed ID: 25434609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors Related to Average Concentric Velocity of Four Barbell Exercises at Various Loads.
    Fahs CA; Blumkaitis JC; Rossow LM
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Mar; 33(3):597-605. PubMed ID: 30640305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Kinematic Differences Between the Front and Back Squat and Conventional and Sumo Deadlift.
    Kasovic J; Martin B; Fahs CA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Dec; 33(12):3213-3219. PubMed ID: 31567791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of Loads and Loading Position on the Muscle Activity of the Trunk and Lower Extremity during Squat Exercise.
    Park JH; Lee SJ; Shin HJ; Cho HY
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct; 19(20):. PubMed ID: 36294056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of the Safety Squat Bar on Trunk and Lower-Body Mechanics During a Back Squat.
    Hecker KA; Carlson LA; Lawrence MA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Jul; 33 Suppl 1():S45-S51. PubMed ID: 30363042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Biomechanical Comparison of the Back Squat and Hexagonal Barbell Deadlift.
    Stahl CA; Regni G; Tanguay J; McElfresh M; Trihy E; Diggin D; King DL
    J Strength Cond Res; 2024 May; 38(5):815-824. PubMed ID: 38662880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Heel-Raised Foot Posture Does Not Affect Trunk and Lower Extremity Biomechanics During a Barbell Back Squat in Recreational Weight lifters.
    Lee SP; Gillis CB; Ibarra JJ; Oldroyd DF; Zane RS
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Mar; 33(3):606-614. PubMed ID: 30789547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of Trunk Muscle Electromyography in the Loaded Back Squat Exercise.
    Clark D; Lambert MI; Hunter AM
    Int J Sports Med; 2016 Jun; 37(6):448-56. PubMed ID: 26928915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trunk muscle activity during different types of low weighted squat exercises in normal and forefoot standing conditions.
    Roth R; Donath L; Faude O; Cresswell AG
    J Sports Sci; 2020 Dec; 38(24):2774-2781. PubMed ID: 32746728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximal Strength, Muscle Activation, and Bar Velocity Comparisons Between Squatting With a Traditional or Safety Squat Bar.
    Vantrease WC; Townsend JR; Sapp PA; Henry RN; Johnson KD
    J Strength Cond Res; 2021 Feb; 35(Suppl 1):S1-S5. PubMed ID: 32032231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of a Single-Session Protocol to Determine the Load-Velocity Profile and One-Repetition Maximum for the Back Squat Exercise.
    Gomes M; Fitas A; Santos P; Pezarat-Correia P; Mendonca GV
    J Strength Cond Res; 2024 Jun; 38(6):1013-1018. PubMed ID: 38373076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trunk muscle activation during dynamic weight-training exercises and isometric instability activities.
    Hamlyn N; Behm DG; Young WB
    J Strength Cond Res; 2007 Nov; 21(4):1108-12. PubMed ID: 18076231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Load-dependent mechanical demands of the lower extremity during the back and front squat.
    Krzyszkowski J; Kipp K
    J Sports Sci; 2020 Sep; 38(17):2005-2012. PubMed ID: 32544021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Compensatory Muscle Activation During Unstable Overhead Squat Using a Water-filled Training Tube.
    Glass SC; Albert RW
    J Strength Cond Res; 2018 May; 32(5):1230-1237. PubMed ID: 28557850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lower-body work capacity and one-repetition maximum squat prediction in college football players.
    Brechue WF; Mayhew JL
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Feb; 26(2):364-72. PubMed ID: 22233793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An electromyographical comparison of trunk muscle activity during isometric trunk and dynamic strengthening exercises.
    Comfort P; Pearson SJ; Mather D
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Jan; 25(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 21157393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.