243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28704329)
1. Long-Term Oncological Outcome After Conventional Radical Hysterectomy Versus 2 Nerve-Sparing Modalities for Early Stage Cervical Cancer.
van Gent MDJM; Rademaker M; van der Veer JCB; van Poelgeest MIE; Gaarenstroom KN; Putter H; Trimbos JBMZ; de Kroon CD
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Oct; 27(8):1729-1736. PubMed ID: 28704329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa).
Kietpeerakool C; Aue-Aungkul A; Galaal K; Ngamjarus C; Lumbiganon P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Feb; 2(2):CD012828. PubMed ID: 30746689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Self-Reported Long-Term Autonomic Function After Laparoscopic Total Mesometrial Resection for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicentric Study.
Lucidi A; Windemut S; Petrillo M; Dessole M; Sozzi G; Vercellino GF; Baessler K; Vizzielli G; Sehouli J; Scambia G; Chiantera V
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Sep; 27(7):1501-1507. PubMed ID: 28708791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nerve-sparing radical abdominal trachelectomy versus nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in early-stage (FIGO IA2-IB) cervical cancer: a comparative study on feasibility and outcome.
van Gent MD; van den Haak LW; Gaarenstroom KN; Peters AA; van Poelgeest MI; Trimbos JB; de Kroon CD
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 May; 24(4):735-43. PubMed ID: 24651626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy vs Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Bladder Dysfunction.
Wu J; Ye T; Lv J; He Z; Zhu J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):417-426.e6. PubMed ID: 30359783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Carcinoma: Emphasis on Nerve Content in Removed Cardinal Ligaments.
Shi R; Wei W; Jiang P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Jan; 26(1):192-8. PubMed ID: 26569055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Open nerve-plane sparing radical hysterectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: evaluation on efficacy and long-term survival outcomes].
Shu T; Li B; Zhao D; Wang YT; Liu SH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Jan; 56(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 33486927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy on Bladder Function Recovery.
Liu Q; Li P; Sun Y; Zhang S; Liu K
J Invest Surg; 2020 Apr; 33(4):381-386. PubMed ID: 30380342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Roh JW; Lee DO; Suh DH; Lim MC; Seo SS; Chung J; Lee S; Park SY
J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 26(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 25872890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nerve plane-sparing radical hysterectomy: a simplified technique of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer.
Li B; Li W; Sun YC; Zhang R; Zhang GY; Yu GZ; Wu LY
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Jun; 124(12):1807-12. PubMed ID: 21740837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy with fascia space dissection technique for cervical cancer: description of technique and outcomes.
Liang Z; Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Nov; 119(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 20673971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A systematic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique in invasive cervical cancer for preserving postsurgical bladder function.
Sakuragi N; Todo Y; Kudo M; Yamamoto R; Sato T
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2005; 15(2):389-97. PubMed ID: 15823132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A prospective study on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer].
Li B; Zhang R; Wu LY; Zhang GY; Li X; Yu GZ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 43(8):606-10. PubMed ID: 19087497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical Outcomes in Early Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Nerve Plane-sparing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy.
Zhao D; Li B; Wang Y; Liu S; Zhang Y; Yuan G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):687-696. PubMed ID: 31075445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Success Factors of Laparoscopic Nerve-sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Preserving Bladder Function in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Protocol-Based Prospective Cohort Study.
Kim HS; Kim TH; Suh DH; Kim SY; Kim MA; Jeong CW; Hong KS; Song YS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015; 22(6):1987-95. PubMed ID: 25465377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of postoperative bladder function and prognosis after modified nerve sparing radical hysterectomy].
Wenwen W; Bin L; Jing Z; Gongyi Z; Yeduo Y; Hongmei Z; Xiaoguang L; Lingying W
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 May; 49(5):341-7. PubMed ID: 25030730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgical, Urinary, and Survival Outcomes of Nerve-sparing Versus Traditional Radical Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study in China.
Li L; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Wu M
Am J Clin Oncol; 2019 Oct; 42(10):783-788. PubMed ID: 31490195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.
Duan D; Liu B; Li L
J BUON; 2020; 25(2):743-749. PubMed ID: 32521862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Favorable factors for preserving bladder function after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: A protocol-based validation study.
Kim HS; Kim M; Luo Y; Lee M; Song YS;
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 116(4):492-499. PubMed ID: 28695641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of pelvic visceral functions after modified nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.
Wang W; Li B; Zuo J; Zhang G; Yang Y; Zeng H; Li X; Wu L
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):696-701. PubMed ID: 24534225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
