BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28704430)

  • 1. Does lack of resources impair access to breast and cervical cancer screening in Japan?
    Sano H; Goto R; Hamashima C
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0180819. PubMed ID: 28704430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Disparities in receipt of breast and cervical cancer screening for rural women age 18 to 64 with disabilities.
    Horner-Johnson W; Dobbertin K; Iezzoni LI
    Womens Health Issues; 2015; 25(3):246-53. PubMed ID: 25864023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are cervical and breast cancer screening programmes equitable? The case of women with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
    Cobigo V; Ouellette-Kuntz H; Balogh R; Leung F; Lin E; Lunsky Y
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2013 May; 57(5):478-88. PubMed ID: 23506206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing Rural and Urban Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening Rates in a Privately Insured Population.
    Orwat J; Caputo N; Key W; De Sa J
    Soc Work Public Health; 2017; 32(5):311-323. PubMed ID: 28409674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast and cervical cancer screening in obese minority women.
    Ferrante JM; Chen PH; Jacobs A
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2006 Jun; 15(5):531-41. PubMed ID: 16796480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Barriers and missed opportunities in breast and cervical cancer screening among women aged 50 and over, New York City, 2002.
    Nash D; Chan C; Horowitz D; Vlahov D
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2007; 16(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 17324096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. US urban-rural disparities in breast cancer-screening practices at the national, regional, and state level, 2012-2016.
    Tran L; Tran P
    Cancer Causes Control; 2019 Oct; 30(10):1045-1055. PubMed ID: 31428890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do cervical cancer screening rates increase in association with an intervention designed to increase mammography usage?
    Katz ML; Tatum CM; Degraffinreid CR; Dickinson S; Paskett ED
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2007; 16(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 17324094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of breast and cervical cancer screening utilization among rural and urban Hispanic and American Indian women in the Southwestern United States.
    Nuño T; Gerald JK; Harris R; Martinez ME; Estrada A; García F
    Cancer Causes Control; 2012 Aug; 23(8):1333-41. PubMed ID: 22710745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast and cervical carcinoma screening practices among women in rural and nonrural areas of the United States, 1998-1999.
    Coughlin SS; Thompson TD; Hall HI; Logan P; Uhler RJ
    Cancer; 2002 Jun; 94(11):2801-12. PubMed ID: 12115366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening in Spanish women with diabetes: associated factors and trend between 2006 and 2010.
    Martinez-Huedo MA; Lopez de Andres A; Hernandez-Barrera V; Carrasco-Garrido P; Martinez Hernandez D; Jiménez-Garcia R
    Diabetes Metab; 2012 Apr; 38(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 22078638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Socioeconomic factors affecting colorectal, breast and cervical cancer screening in an Asian urban low-income setting at baseline and post-intervention.
    Wee LE; Koh GC; Chin RT; Yeo WX; Seow B; Chua D
    Prev Med; 2012 Jul; 55(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 22561028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trends in cervical and breast cancer screening practices among women in rural and urban areas of the United States.
    Doescher MP; Jackson JE
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2009; 15(3):200-9. PubMed ID: 19363399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A nationally quasi-experimental study to assess the impact of partial organized breast and cervical cancer screening programme on participation and inequalities.
    Bao H; Wang L; Brown M; Zhang M; Hunt K; Di J; Zhao Z; Cong S; Fan J; Fang L; Wang L
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Dec; 20(1):1191. PubMed ID: 33276761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social capital and adherence to cervical and breast cancer screening guidelines: a cross-sectional study in rural Crete.
    Moudatsou MM; Kritsotakis G; Alegakis AK; Koutis A; Philalithis AE
    Health Soc Care Community; 2014 Jul; 22(4):395-404. PubMed ID: 24450830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rural-Urban Disparities in Access to Breast Cancer Screening: A Spatial Clustering Analysis.
    Chandak A; Nayar P; Lin G
    J Rural Health; 2019 Mar; 35(2):229-235. PubMed ID: 29888497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Spain and predictors of adherence.
    Martín-López R; Hernández-Barrera V; De Andres AL; Garrido PC; De Miguel AG; García RJ
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2010 May; 19(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 20110817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical and breast cancer screening participation for women with chronic conditions in France: results from a national health survey.
    Constantinou P; Dray-Spira R; Menvielle G
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Mar; 16():255. PubMed ID: 27029643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Related to Breast and Cervical Cancers in Mongolia: A National Population-Based Survey.
    Yerramilli P; Dugee O; Enkhtuya P; Knaul FM; Demaio AR
    Oncologist; 2015 Nov; 20(11):1266-73. PubMed ID: 26417038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of mass screening for breast cancer in Japan.
    Kuroishi T; Hirose K; Suzuki T; Tominaga S
    Breast Cancer; 2000 Jan; 7(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11029764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.