These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28704894)

  • 21. Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure: A Working Memory Test for Use in Rehabilitative Audiology.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alexander G
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e360-e376. PubMed ID: 27438869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Influence of Noise Type and Semantic Predictability on Word Recall in Older Listeners and Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
    Carter BL; Apoux F; Healy EW
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Sep; 65(9):3548-3565. PubMed ID: 35973100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of stimulus modality, task complexity, and cuing on working memory and the relationship with speech recognition in older cochlear implant users.
    Luo X; Azuma T; Kolberg C; Pulling KR
    J Commun Disord; 2022; 95():106170. PubMed ID: 34839068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Contribution of auditory working memory to speech understanding in mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.
    Tao D; Deng R; Jiang Y; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Chen B
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99096. PubMed ID: 24921934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.
    Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V; Molis MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The fluctuating masker benefit for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with equal audibility at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.
    Jensen KK; Bernstein JGW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Apr; 145(4):2113. PubMed ID: 31046298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Early Sentence Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    James CJ; Karoui C; Laborde ML; Lepage B; Molinier CÉ; Tartayre M; Escudé B; Deguine O; Marx M; Fraysse B
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):905-917. PubMed ID: 30335668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Auditory Working Memory Explains Variance in Speech Recognition in Older Listeners Under Adverse Listening Conditions.
    Kim S; Choi I; Schwalje AT; Kim K; Lee JH
    Clin Interv Aging; 2020; 15():395-406. PubMed ID: 32231429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
    Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Speech Perception in Noise With Formant Enhancement for Older Listeners.
    Guan J; Liu C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 62(9):3290-3301. PubMed ID: 31479380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Relationship Between Working Memory and Speech-in-Noise Recognition in Young and Older Adult Listeners With Age-Appropriate Hearing.
    Vermeire K; Knoop A; De Sloovere M; Bosch P; van den Noort M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 62(9):3545-3553. PubMed ID: 31433720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Production of sentence-final intonation contours by hearing-impaired children.
    Allen GD; Arndorfer PM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Apr; 43(2):441-55. PubMed ID: 10757695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
    Strelcyk O; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of noise reduction on AM perception for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Ives DT; Kalluri S; Strelcyk O; Sheft S; Miermont F; Coez A; Bizaguet E; Lorenzi C
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Oct; 15(5):839-48. PubMed ID: 24899379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.