280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28705064)
1. Validation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Using an MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.
Kim SH; Choi MS; Kim MJ; Kim YH; Cho SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Oct; 209(4):800-805. PubMed ID: 28705064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Syed JS; Aneja S; Sprenkle PC; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):347-357. PubMed ID: 29112469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Central zone lesions on magnetic resonance imaging: Should we be concerned?
Tan WP; Mazzone A; Shors S; Antoine N; Ekbal S; Khare N; McKiel C; Pessis D; Deane L
Urol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):31.e7-31.e12. PubMed ID: 27692837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Category 5 Lesions Found False-Positive at Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Aneja S; Syed JS; Pahade J; Mathur M; Sprenkle P; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 May; 210(5):W218-W225. PubMed ID: 29489409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.
Hofbauer SL; Maxeiner A; Kittner B; Heckmann R; Reimann M; Wiemer L; Asbach P; Haas M; Penzkofer T; Stephan C; Friedersdorff F; Fuller F; Miller K; Cash H
J Urol; 2018 Oct; 200(4):767-773. PubMed ID: 29733838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of a Structured Reporting Template on Adherence to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 and on the Diagnostic Performance of Prostate MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Shaish H; Feltus W; Steinman J; Hecht E; Wenske S; Ahmed F
J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 May; 15(5):749-754. PubMed ID: 29506919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADS v2): Interobserver Agreement and Positive Predictive Value for Localization of Intermediate- and High-Grade Prostate Cancers on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Chen F; Cen S; Palmer S
Acad Radiol; 2017 Sep; 24(9):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 28546032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Prostate Cancer Detection.
Mertan FV; Greer MD; Shih JH; George AK; Kongnyuy M; Muthigi A; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
J Urol; 2016 Sep; 196(3):690-6. PubMed ID: 27101772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate zonal anatomy correlates with the detection of prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion-targeted biopsy in patients with a solitary PI-RADS v2-scored lesion.
Syed JS; Nguyen KA; Nawaf CB; Bhagat AM; Huber S; Levi A; Humphrey P; Weinreb JC; Schulam PG; Sprenkle PC
Urol Oncol; 2017 Sep; 35(9):542.e19-542.e24. PubMed ID: 28501565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Targeted MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy in men with previous prostate biopsies using a novel registration software and multiparametric MRI PI-RADS scores: first results.
Tewes S; Hueper K; Hartung D; Imkamp F; Herrmann TR; Weidemann J; Renckly S; Kuczyk MA; Wacker F; Peters I
World J Urol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1707-14. PubMed ID: 25774003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate cancer detection on transrectal ultrasonography-guided random biopsy despite negative real-time magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure.
Cash H; Günzel K; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Miller K; Asbach P; Haas M; Kempkensteffen C
BJU Int; 2016 Jul; 118(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26384851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective Evaluation of PI-RADS™ Version 2 Using the International Society of Urological Pathology Prostate Cancer Grade Group System.
Mehralivand S; Bednarova S; Shih JH; Mertan FV; Gaur S; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
J Urol; 2017 Sep; 198(3):583-590. PubMed ID: 28373133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interreader Agreement of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Using an In-Bore MRI-Guided Prostate Biopsy Cohort: A Single Institution's Initial Experience.
Glazer DI; Mayo-Smith WW; Sainani NI; Sadow CA; Vangel MG; Tempany CM; Dunne RM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):W145-W151. PubMed ID: 28657843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective comparison of a fast 1.5-T biparametric with the 3.0-T multiparametric ESUR magnetic resonance imaging protocol as a triage test for men at risk of prostate cancer.
Van Nieuwenhove S; Saussez TP; Thiry S; Trefois P; Annet L; Michoux N; Lecouvet F; Tombal B
BJU Int; 2019 Mar; 123(3):411-420. PubMed ID: 30240059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive value of PI-RADS classification in MRI-directed transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.
NiMhurchu E; O'Kelly F; Murphy IG; Lavelle LP; Collins CD; Lennon G; Galvin D; Mulvin D; Quinlan D; McMahon CJ
Clin Radiol; 2016 Apr; 71(4):375-80. PubMed ID: 26880299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the PI-RADS language: predictive values of PI-RADS lexicon descriptors for detection of prostate cancer.
Rudolph MM; Baur ADJ; Haas M; Cash H; Miller K; Mahjoub S; Hartenstein A; Kaufmann D; Rotzinger R; Lee CH; Asbach P; Hamm B; Penzkofer T
Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4262-4271. PubMed ID: 32219507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2.
Feng ZY; Wang L; Min XD; Wang SG; Wang GP; Cai J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Oct; 129(20):2451-2459. PubMed ID: 27748338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lesion volume predicts prostate cancer risk and aggressiveness: validation of its value alone and matched with prostate imaging reporting and data system score.
Martorana E; Pirola GM; Scialpi M; Micali S; Iseppi A; Bonetti LR; Kaleci S; Torricelli P; Bianchi G
BJU Int; 2017 Jul; 120(1):92-103. PubMed ID: 27608292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The detection of significant prostate cancer is correlated with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy.
Cash H; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Holzmann J; Asbach P; Haas M; Hinz S; Neymeyer J; Miller K; Günzel K; Kempkensteffen C
World J Urol; 2016 Apr; 34(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 26293117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Classification in the Prediction of Tumor Aggressiveness in Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound-Fusion Biopsy.
Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Renner T; Herout R; Baunacke M; Laniado M; Baretton GB; Froehner M; Zastrow S; Wirth MP
Urol Int; 2017; 99(2):177-185. PubMed ID: 28531902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
