315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28705523)
1. Early volumetric changes after vertical augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional block graft versus onlay bone graft: A retrospective radiological study.
Barone A; Toti P; Menchini-Fabris GB; Felice P; Marchionni S; Covani U
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Sep; 45(9):1438-1447. PubMed ID: 28705523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implant treatment in atrophic posterior mandibles: vertical regeneration with block bone grafts versus implants with 5.5-mm intrabony length.
Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Aloy-Prósper A; Cervera-Ballester J; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Canullo L; Peñarrocha-Diago M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(3):659-66. PubMed ID: 24818205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Blocks of autogenous bone versus xenografts for the rehabilitation of atrophic jaws with dental implants: preliminary data from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
Pistilli R; Felice P; Piatelli M; Nisii A; Barausse C; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(2):153-71. PubMed ID: 24977250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inlay versus onlay iliac bone grafting in atrophic posterior mandible: a prospective controlled clinical trial for the comparison of two techniques.
Felice P; Pistilli R; Lizio G; Pellegrino G; Nisii A; Marchetti C
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Oct; 11 Suppl 1():e69-82. PubMed ID: 19681938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vertical ridge augmentation of an atrophic posterior mandible with an inlay technique and cancellous equine bone block: a case report.
Felice P; Piana L; Checchi L; Corvino V; Nannmark U; Piattelli M
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 23484171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vertical ridge augmentation of atrophic posterior mandible with corticocancellous onlay symphysis graft versus sandwich technique: clinical and radiographic analysis.
Fekry YE; Mahmoud NR
Odontology; 2023 Oct; 111(4):993-1002. PubMed ID: 36853425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional block grafts: bone from the iliac crest versus bovine anorganic bone.
Felice P; Marchetti C; Piattelli A; Pellegrino G; Checchi V; Worthington H; Esposito M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2008; 1(3):183-98. PubMed ID: 20467621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional bloc grafts: bone from the iliac crest vs. bovine anorganic bone. Clinical and histological results up to one year after loading from a randomized-controlled clinical trial.
Felice P; Marchetti C; Iezzi G; Piattelli A; Worthington H; Pellegrino G; Esposito M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Dec; 20(12):1386-93. PubMed ID: 19681966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Resonance frequency analysis assessment of implant stability in labial onlay grafted posterior mandibles: a pilot clinical study.
Ozkan Y; Ozcan M; Varol A; Akoglu B; Ucankale M; Basa S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(2):235-42. PubMed ID: 17465348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Volume changes of iliac crest autogenous bone grafts after vertical and horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation of atrophic maxillas and mandibles: a 6-year computerized tomographic follow-up.
Sbordone C; Toti P; Guidetti F; Califano L; Santoro A; Sbordone L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 70(11):2559-65. PubMed ID: 22959878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cortical tenting technique versus onlay layered technique for vertical augmentation of atrophic posterior mandibles: a split-mouth pilot study.
Morad G; Khojasteh A
Implant Dent; 2013 Dec; 22(6):566-71. PubMed ID: 24185462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vertical ridge augmentation using sandwich osteotomy: 2 case reports.
Kilic E; Alkan A; Ulu M; Zortuk M; Gumus HO
Gen Dent; 2013; 61(6):e22-5. PubMed ID: 24064173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Clinical effects of ridge augmentation with the half-columnar shaped mandibular bone block for the placement of dental implants].
Tang ZH; Lv H; Cao MX; Wu MJ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Feb; 42(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 20140053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reconstruction of mandibular vertical defects for dental implants with autogenous bone block grafts using a tunnel approach: clinical study of 50 cases.
Restoy-Lozano A; Dominguez-Mompell JL; Infante-Cossio P; Lara-Chao J; Espin-Galvez F; Lopez-Pizarro V
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 44(11):1416-22. PubMed ID: 26116063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of vertical ridge augmentation and marginal bone loss using autogenous onlay vs inlay grafting techniques with simultaneous implant placement in the anterior maxillary esthetic zone: A randomized clinical trial.
El Zahwy M; Taha SAAK; Mounir R; Mounir M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Dec; 21(6):1140-1147. PubMed ID: 31743566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with a 2-stage inlay technique: a case report.
Felice P; Piana L; Checchi L; Pistilli R; Pellegrino G
Implant Dent; 2012 Jun; 21(3):190-5. PubMed ID: 22584421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Deep-frozen allogeneic onlay bone grafts for reconstruction of atrophic maxillary alveolar ridges: a preliminary study.
Barone A; Varanini P; Orlando B; Tonelli P; Covani U
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jun; 67(6):1300-6. PubMed ID: 19446220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Autogenous interpositional block graft vs onlay graft for horizontal ridge augmentation in the mandible.
Atef M; Osman AH; Hakam M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Aug; 21(4):678-685. PubMed ID: 31260166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of pericranium grafts in the reduction of postoperative dehiscences and bone resorption after reconstruction of severely deficient edentulous ridges with autogenous onlay bone grafts.
Chiapasco M; Autelitano L; Rabbiosi D; Zaniboni M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):679-87. PubMed ID: 22551410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reconstruction of atrophied posterior mandible with inlay technique and mandibular ramus block graft for implant prosthetic rehabilitation.
Felice P; Iezzi G; Lizio G; Piattelli A; Marchetti C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 67(2):372-80. PubMed ID: 19138613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
