These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28705591)

  • 1. Effectiveness of surgery versus conservative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: A system review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Ma XL; Zhao XW; Ma JX; Li F; Wang Y; Lu B
    Int J Surg; 2017 Aug; 44():329-338. PubMed ID: 28705591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Zaina F; Tomkins-Lane C; Carragee E; Negrini S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Jan; 2016(1):CD010264. PubMed ID: 26824399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Benyamin RM; Staats PS; MiDAS Encore I
    Pain Physician; 2016 May; 19(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 27228511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interspinous process devices(IPD) alone versus decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis(LSS): A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zhao XW; Ma JX; Ma XL; Li F; He WW; Jiang X; Wang Y; Han B; Lu B
    Int J Surg; 2017 Mar; 39():57-64. PubMed ID: 28110031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgery versus conservative treatment for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
    Kovacs FM; Urrútia G; Alarcón JD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Sep; 36(20):E1335-51. PubMed ID: 21311394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MiDAS ENCORE: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Report of 6-Month Results.
    Staats PS; Benyamin RM;
    Pain Physician; 2016 Feb; 19(2):25-38. PubMed ID: 26815247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
    Overdevest GM; Jacobs W; Vleggeert-Lankamp C; Thomé C; Gunzburg R; Peul W
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; (3):CD010036. PubMed ID: 25760812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MiDAS ENCORE: Randomized Controlled Study Design and Protocol.
    Benyamin RM; Staats PS
    Pain Physician; 2015; 18(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 26218933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of decompression alone versus decompression plus fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chang W; Yuwen P; Zhu Y; Wei N; Feng C; Zhang Y; Chen W
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 May; 137(5):637-650. PubMed ID: 28361467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of conservative versus surgical treatment strategies of lumbar spinal stenosis in the Swiss setting: analysis of the prospective multicenter Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study (LSOS).
    Aichmair A; Burgstaller JM; Schwenkglenks M; Steurer J; Porchet F; Brunner F; Farshad M;
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):501-509. PubMed ID: 28040872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. X-stop versus decompressive surgery for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up.
    Strömqvist BH; Berg S; Gerdhem P; Johnsson R; Möller A; Sahlstrand T; Soliman A; Tullberg T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(17):1436-42. PubMed ID: 23403549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive decompression versus x-stop in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled multicenter study.
    Lønne G; Johnsen LG; Rossvoll I; Andresen H; Storheim K; Zwart JA; Nygaard ØP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(2):77-85. PubMed ID: 25575084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Quality of Life and Functional Outcome after Microsurgical Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: a Register Study].
    Zarghooni K; Beyer F; Papadaki J; Boese CK; Siewe J; Schiffer G; Eysel P; Bredow J
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2017 Aug; 155(4):429-434. PubMed ID: 28437825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
    Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is the duration of pre-operative conservative treatment associated with the clinical outcome following surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis? A study based on the Spine Tango Registry.
    Zweig T; Enke J; Mannion AF; Sobottke R; Melloh M; Freeman BJ; Aghayev E;
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):488-500. PubMed ID: 27981454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of obesity on complications and outcomes: a comparison of fusion and nonfusion lumbar spine surgery.
    Onyekwelu I; Glassman SD; Asher AL; Shaffrey CI; Mummaneni PV; Carreon LY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):158-162. PubMed ID: 27740396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of life of lumbar stenosis-treated patients in whom the X STOP interspinous device was implanted.
    Hsu KY; Zucherman JF; Hartjen CA; Mehalic TF; Implicito DA; Martin MJ; Johnson DR; Skidmore GA; Vessa PP; Dwyer JW; Cauthen JC; Ozuna RM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Dec; 5(6):500-7. PubMed ID: 17176013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized controlled trial of the X-Stop interspinous distractor device versus laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis with 2-year quality-of-life and cost-effectiveness outcomes.
    Borg A; Hill CS; Nurboja B; Critchley G; Choi D
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Feb; 34(4):544-552. PubMed ID: 33530059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decompression with fusion is not in superiority to decompression alone in lumbar stenosis based on randomized controlled trials: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.
    Xu S; Wang J; Liang Y; Zhu Z; Wang K; Qian Y; Liu H
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Nov; 98(46):e17849. PubMed ID: 31725625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective study of non-surgical versus surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis without instability.
    Jung JM; Hyun SJ; Kim KJ; Kim CH; Chung CK; Kim KH; Cho YE; Shin DA; Park YK; Choi Y
    J Clin Neurosci; 2020 Oct; 80():100-107. PubMed ID: 33099329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.