These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28705591)
1. Effectiveness of surgery versus conservative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: A system review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ma XL; Zhao XW; Ma JX; Li F; Wang Y; Lu B Int J Surg; 2017 Aug; 44():329-338. PubMed ID: 28705591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial. Benyamin RM; Staats PS; MiDAS Encore I Pain Physician; 2016 May; 19(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 27228511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interspinous process devices(IPD) alone versus decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis(LSS): A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Zhao XW; Ma JX; Ma XL; Li F; He WW; Jiang X; Wang Y; Han B; Lu B Int J Surg; 2017 Mar; 39():57-64. PubMed ID: 28110031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgery versus conservative treatment for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Kovacs FM; Urrútia G; Alarcón JD Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Sep; 36(20):E1335-51. PubMed ID: 21311394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Quality of Life and Functional Outcome after Microsurgical Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: a Register Study]. Zarghooni K; Beyer F; Papadaki J; Boese CK; Siewe J; Schiffer G; Eysel P; Bredow J Z Orthop Unfall; 2017 Aug; 155(4):429-434. PubMed ID: 28437825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article. Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is the duration of pre-operative conservative treatment associated with the clinical outcome following surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis? A study based on the Spine Tango Registry. Zweig T; Enke J; Mannion AF; Sobottke R; Melloh M; Freeman BJ; Aghayev E; Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):488-500. PubMed ID: 27981454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of obesity on complications and outcomes: a comparison of fusion and nonfusion lumbar spine surgery. Onyekwelu I; Glassman SD; Asher AL; Shaffrey CI; Mummaneni PV; Carreon LY J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):158-162. PubMed ID: 27740396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality of life of lumbar stenosis-treated patients in whom the X STOP interspinous device was implanted. Hsu KY; Zucherman JF; Hartjen CA; Mehalic TF; Implicito DA; Martin MJ; Johnson DR; Skidmore GA; Vessa PP; Dwyer JW; Cauthen JC; Ozuna RM J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Dec; 5(6):500-7. PubMed ID: 17176013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized controlled trial of the X-Stop interspinous distractor device versus laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis with 2-year quality-of-life and cost-effectiveness outcomes. Borg A; Hill CS; Nurboja B; Critchley G; Choi D J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Feb; 34(4):544-552. PubMed ID: 33530059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Decompression with fusion is not in superiority to decompression alone in lumbar stenosis based on randomized controlled trials: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis. Xu S; Wang J; Liang Y; Zhu Z; Wang K; Qian Y; Liu H Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Nov; 98(46):e17849. PubMed ID: 31725625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective study of non-surgical versus surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis without instability. Jung JM; Hyun SJ; Kim KJ; Kim CH; Chung CK; Kim KH; Cho YE; Shin DA; Park YK; Choi Y J Clin Neurosci; 2020 Oct; 80():100-107. PubMed ID: 33099329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]