These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28707101)

  • 1. The Use of ACOG Guidelines: Perceived Contraindications to IUD and Implant Use Among Family Planning Providers.
    Philliber AE; Hirsch H; Brindis CD; Turner R; Philliber S
    Matern Child Health J; 2017 Sep; 21(9):1706-1712. PubMed ID: 28707101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Obstetrician-gynecologists and contraception: long-acting reversible contraception practices and education.
    Luchowski AT; Anderson BL; Power ML; Raglan GB; Espey E; Schulkin J
    Contraception; 2014 Jun; 89(6):578-83. PubMed ID: 24656553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Obstetrician-gynecologists and contraception: practice and opinions about the use of IUDs in nulliparous women, adolescents and other patient populations.
    Luchowski AT; Anderson BL; Power ML; Raglan GB; Espey E; Schulkin J
    Contraception; 2014 Jun; 89(6):572-7. PubMed ID: 24679477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of years of clinical experience on perceived contraindications and barriers to the use of LARC: a survey of family planning providers.
    Philliber AE; Hirsch H; Mortillaro L; Turner R; Arons A; Philliber S
    Womens Health Issues; 2014; 24(5):503-9. PubMed ID: 25213743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adherence to Recommended Practices for Provision of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Among Providers in a Large U.S. Health Care System.
    Judge-Golden CP; Wiesenfeld HC; Chen BA; Borrero S
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2020 Dec; 29(12):1586-1595. PubMed ID: 32667847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Same-day LARC insertion attitudes and practices.
    Biggs MA; Arons A; Turner R; Brindis CD
    Contraception; 2013 Nov; 88(5):629-35. PubMed ID: 23809277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Healthcare Provider Attitudes of Safety of Intrauterine Devices in the Postpartum Period.
    Rauh-Benoit LA; Tepper NK; Zapata LB; Whiteman MK; Curtis KM; Mandel MG; Marchbanks PA; Jamieson DJ
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2017 Jul; 26(7):768-773. PubMed ID: 27992305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences among primary care physicians' adherence to 2009 ACOG guidelines for cervical cancer screening.
    Corbelli J; Borrero S; Bonnema R; McNamara M; Kraemer K; Rubio D; Karpov I; McNeil M
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2014 May; 23(5):397-403. PubMed ID: 24380500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Today's IUDs offer safe, effective contraception.
    Finger WR
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1993 Mar; 13(3):12-5. PubMed ID: 12318094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Knowledge and perceptions of the intrauterine device among family planning providers in Nepal: a cross-sectional analysis by cadre and sector.
    Chakraborty NM; Murphy C; Paudel M; Sharma S
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Jan; 15():39. PubMed ID: 25627578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Post-partum contraception: Guidelines for clinical practice].
    Raccah-Tebeka B; Plu-Bureau G
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 Dec; 44(10):1127-34. PubMed ID: 26527021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?].
    Forrest JD
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Obstetrician-gynecologists and the intrauterine device: a survey of attitudes and practice.
    Stanwood NL; Garrett JM; Konrad TR
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 11814509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attitudes and practices related to intrauterine devices for nulliparous women among Chinese health care providers.
    Wang Z; Lou C; Jin L; Miao M; Tu X; Liang H; Cheng Y; Yuan W
    Reprod Health; 2019 Jan; 16(1):10. PubMed ID: 30704499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acceptability of IUDs is increasing.
    Finger WR; Barr D
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1992 Oct; 13(2):27-30. PubMed ID: 12286082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative contraceptive effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices: the European Active Surveillance Study for Intrauterine Devices.
    Heinemann K; Reed S; Moehner S; Minh TD
    Contraception; 2015 Apr; 91(4):280-3. PubMed ID: 25601350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implementing best practices for the provision of long-acting reversible contraception: a survey of obstetrician-gynecologists.
    Castleberry NM; Stark L; Schulkin J; Grossman D
    Contraception; 2019 Aug; 100(2):123-127. PubMed ID: 30981843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The evidence is in. Why are IUDs still out?: family physicians' perceptions of risk and indications.
    Stubbs E; Schamp A
    Can Fam Physician; 2008 Apr; 54(4):560-6. PubMed ID: 18411385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Counseling Adolescents About the Intrauterine Contraceptive Device: A Comparison of Primary Care Pediatricians With Family Physicians and Obstetrician-Gynecologists in the Bronx, New York.
    Rubin SE; Cohen HW; Santelli JS; McKee MD
    J Prim Care Community Health; 2015 Jul; 6(3):162-9. PubMed ID: 25628297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.