These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28707177)

  • 1. Do people use category-learning judgments to regulate their learning of natural categories?
    Morehead K; Dunlosky J; Foster NL
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Nov; 45(8):1253-1269. PubMed ID: 28707177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Metacognitive monitoring during category learning: how success affects future behaviour.
    Doyle ME; Hourihan KL
    Memory; 2016 Oct; 24(9):1197-207. PubMed ID: 26377626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monitoring of learning at the category level when learning a natural concept: will task experience improve its resolution?
    Tauber SK; Dunlosky J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Feb; 155():8-18. PubMed ID: 25528538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Collaboration facilitates abstract category learning.
    Richey JE; Nokes-Malach TJ; Cohen K
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Jul; 46(5):685-698. PubMed ID: 29427208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Self-regulated learning of a natural category: do people interleave or block exemplars during study?
    Tauber SK; Dunlosky J; Rawson KA; Wahlheim CN; Jacoby LL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Apr; 20(2):356-63. PubMed ID: 23055143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When will bigger be (recalled) better? The influence of category size on JOLs depends on test format.
    Hourihan KL; Tullis JG
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):910-21. PubMed ID: 25758175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metacognitive unawareness of the errorful generation benefit and its effects on self-regulated learning.
    Yang C; Potts R; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1073-1092. PubMed ID: 28114778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Making Retrospective Confidence Judgments Improves Learners' Ability to Decide What Not to Study.
    Robey AM; Dougherty MR; Buttaccio DR
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 28934588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Older and younger adults use a functionally identical algorithm to select items for restudy during multitrial learning.
    Dunlosky J; Hertzog C
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 1997 Jul; 52(4):P178-86. PubMed ID: 9224442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incidental auditory category learning.
    Gabay Y; Dick FK; Zevin JD; Holt LL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):1124-38. PubMed ID: 26010588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feeling of knowing and restudy choices.
    Hanczakowski M; Zawadzka K; Cockcroft-McKay C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1617-22. PubMed ID: 24659050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of training sequence and between-category similarity on unsupervised induction.
    Clapper JP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(7):1370-90. PubMed ID: 25384115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-related differences in effectiveness of item restudy choices: the role of value.
    Li P; Zhang Y; Li W; Li X
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2018 Jan; 25(1):122-131. PubMed ID: 27938313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tests of an exemplar-memory model of classification learning in a high-dimensional natural-science category domain.
    Nosofsky RM; Sanders CA; McDaniel MA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Mar; 147(3):328-353. PubMed ID: 29058939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Metamemory monitoring and control following retrieval practice for text.
    Little JL; McDaniel MA
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 25135813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The perceptual effects of learning object categories that predict perceptual goals.
    Van Gulick AE; Gauthier I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1307-20. PubMed ID: 24820671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Metacognitive judgments of repetition and variability effects in natural concept learning: evidence for variability neglect.
    Wahlheim CN; Finn B; Jacoby LL
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Jul; 40(5):703-16. PubMed ID: 22282159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance bias: Why judgments of learning are not affected by learning.
    Kornell N; Hausman H
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Nov; 45(8):1270-1280. PubMed ID: 28741254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discovering functional units in continuous speech.
    Lim SJ; Lacerda F; Holt LL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):1139-52. PubMed ID: 26010592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does delaying judgments of learning really improve the efficacy of study decisions? Not so much.
    Kimball DR; Smith TA; Muntean WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):923-54. PubMed ID: 22250913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.