238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28707207)
1. Why published research is untrustworthy.
Lose G; Klarskov N
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1271-1274. PubMed ID: 28707207
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Behind the scenes of scientific articles: defining categories of fraud and regulating cases].
Pontille D; Torny D
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2012 Aug; 60(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 22819062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Update to readers and authors on ethical and scientific misconduct: retraction of the "Boldt articles".
Miller DR
Can J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 58(9):777-9, 779-81. PubMed ID: 21800211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigating the previous studies of a fraudulent author.
Smith R
BMJ; 2005 Jul; 331(7511):288-91. PubMed ID: 16052023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The science of retraction.
Nat Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 5(12):1249. PubMed ID: 12447375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
Steen RG
J Med Ethics; 2011 Apr; 37(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 21186208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retractions by Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences due to Scientific Misconduct.
Jawaid SA; Jawaid M
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 Aug; 26(8):718-9. PubMed ID: 27539774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliable References, Accountable Authors, and Steadfast Reviewers Mitigate Against Retracted Publications and Scientific Misconduct.
Brand JC; Rossi MJ; Lubowitz JH
Arthroscopy; 2017 Aug; 33(8):1435-1436. PubMed ID: 28779791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Why we should reward peer reviewers.
Maffia P
Cardiovasc Res; 2018 Apr; 114(5):e30-e31. PubMed ID: 29590390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Promoting ethical conduct in the publication of research.
Freedman JE
Cardiovasc Ther; 2008; 26(2):89-90. PubMed ID: 18485131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reflections on a retraction.
Kennedy D
Science; 2000 Aug; 289(5482):1137. PubMed ID: 10970223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Japanese doctor is heading for record number of retracted research papers.
Dyer C
BMJ; 2012 Jul; 345():e4596. PubMed ID: 22763400
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Tattered threads.
Shafer SL
Anesth Analg; 2009 May; 108(5):1361-3. PubMed ID: 19372305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Notice: Duplicate Publication.
Ushiop M; Iwasaki S; Chihara Y; Murofushi T
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 28(3):244; author reply 244. PubMed ID: 18773546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Inaction over retractions of identified fraudulent publications: ongoing weakness in the system of scientific self-correction.
Wiedermann CJ
Account Res; 2018; 25(4):239-253. PubMed ID: 29514510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gel slicing and dicing: a recipe for disaster.
Nat Cell Biol; 2004 Apr; 6(4):275. PubMed ID: 15057234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Institutional research and biomedical journals: Poor quality articles and honest researchers!
Maisonneuve H; Slim K
J Visc Surg; 2015 Nov; 152(5):275-8. PubMed ID: 26476677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Cost of Scientific Misconduct.
Tarazi C
Pediatr Res; 2015 Nov; 78(5):482. PubMed ID: 26263444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Unacceptable practice in our field.
Haddad FS
Bone Joint J; 2020 Nov; 102-B(11):1429-1430. PubMed ID: 33135453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: a Latin American perspective.
Alfaro-Toloza P; Mayta-Tristan P; Rodriguez-Morales AJ
Curr Med Res Opin; 2013 Feb; 29(2):99-100. PubMed ID: 23210610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
