342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28708129)
1. Validation of a novel imaging approach using multi-slice CT and cone-beam CT to follow-up on condylar remodeling after bimaxillary surgery.
Nicolielo LFP; Van Dessel J; Shaheen E; Letelier C; Codari M; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
Int J Oral Sci; 2017 Sep; 9(3):139-144. PubMed ID: 28708129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of a novel semi-automated method for three-dimensional surface rendering of condyles using cone beam computed tomography data.
Xi T; van Loon B; Fudalej P; Bergé S; Swennen G; Maal T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Aug; 42(8):1023-9. PubMed ID: 23528746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of bimaxillary surgery on adaptive condylar head remodeling: metric analysis and image interpretation using cone-beam computed tomography volume superimposition.
Park SB; Yang YM; Kim YI; Cho BH; Jung YH; Hwang DS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 70(8):1951-9. PubMed ID: 22104132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Three-dimensional quantitative evaluation of condylar bone remodeling of temporomandibular joint based on cone-beam CT imaging].
Li Y; Liu MQ; Liu B; Lei J; Fu KY
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):617-623. PubMed ID: 32878395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. 3D analysis of condylar remodelling and skeletal relapse following bilateral sagittal split advancement osteotomies.
Xi T; Schreurs R; van Loon B; de Koning M; Bergé S; Hoppenreijs T; Maal T
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 43(4):462-8. PubMed ID: 25779607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Counterclockwise maxillomandibular advancement surgery and disc repositioning: can condylar remodeling in the long-term follow-up be predicted?
Gomes LR; Cevidanes LH; Gomes MR; Ruellas AC; Ryan DP; Paniagua B; Wolford LM; Gonçalves JR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 46(12):1569-1578. PubMed ID: 28728709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional analysis of condylar remodeling and skeletal relapse following bimaxillary surgery: A 2-year follow-up study.
Xi T; van Luijn R; Baan F; Schreurs R; de Koning M; Bergé S; Maal T
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Aug; 45(8):1311-1318. PubMed ID: 28684071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of a 3D CBCT-based protocol for the follow-up of mandibular condyle remodeling.
Verhelst PJ; Shaheen E; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Van der Cruyssen F; Shujaat S; Coudyzer W; Salmon B; Swennen G; Politis C; Jacobs R
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Mar; 49(3):20190364. PubMed ID: 31674794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Regional 3D superimposition to assess temporomandibular joint condylar morphology.
Schilling J; Gomes LC; Benavides E; Nguyen T; Paniagua B; Styner M; Boen V; Gonçalves JR; Cevidanes LH
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(1):20130273. PubMed ID: 24170802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel region-growing based semi-automatic segmentation protocol for three-dimensional condylar reconstruction using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Xi T; Schreurs R; Heerink WJ; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e111126. PubMed ID: 25401954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short- and long-term changes of condylar position after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement in combination with Le Fort I osteotomy evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography.
Chen S; Lei J; Wang X; Fu KY; Farzad P; Yi B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1956-66. PubMed ID: 23973047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Morpho-functional analysis of the temporomandibular joint following mandible-first bimaxillary surgery with mandible-only patient-specific implants.
Bevini M; Gulotta C; Lunari O; Cercenelli L; Marcelli E; Felice P; Tarsitano A; Badiali G
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2024 May; 52(5):570-577. PubMed ID: 38485626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantification of bone quality using different cone beam computed tomography devices: Accuracy assessment for edentulous human mandibles.
Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Slagmolen P; Politis C; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):411-424. PubMed ID: 27990508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with multislice computed tomography in detection of small osseous condylar defects.
Jones EM; Papio M; Tee BC; Beck FM; Fields HW; Sun Z
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jul; 150(1):130-9. PubMed ID: 27364215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of simulated small osseous defects in the mandibular condyle.
Patel A; Tee BC; Fields H; Jones E; Chaudhry J; Sun Z
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 24485728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cone beam computed tomography-based models versus multislice spiral computed tomography-based models for assessing condylar morphology.
Gomes LR; Gomes MR; Gonçalves JR; Ruellas AC; Wolford LM; Paniagua B; Benavides E; Cevidanes LH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Jan; 121(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 26679363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of surface- and voxel-based registration on the mandibular ramus for long-term three-dimensional assessment of condylar remodelling following orthognathic surgery.
Holte MB; Sæderup H; Pinholt EM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 May; 51(4):20210499. PubMed ID: 35143288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Condylar and mandibular morphological criteria in the 2D and 3D MSCT imaging for patients with Class II division 1 subdivision malocclusion.
Krisjane Z; Urtane I; Krumina G; Bieza A; Zepa K; Rogovska I
Stomatologija; 2007; 9(3):67-71. PubMed ID: 17993738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of condylar changes after orthognathic surgery using computed tomography regional superimposition.
Claus JDP; Koerich L; Weissheimer A; Almeida MS; Belle de Oliveira R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Sep; 48(9):1201-1208. PubMed ID: 30871846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and reliability of different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices for structural analysis of alveolar bone in comparison with multislice CT and micro-CT.
Van Dessel J; Nicolielo LF; Huang Y; Coudyzer W; Salmon B; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 28327698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
