These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2870842)

  • 1. The significance of differences between means. An empirical study.
    Scheer BT
    Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol; 1986; 83(3):405-8. PubMed ID: 2870842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The significance of differences between means. A simulation study.
    McArdle BH
    Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol; 1987; 87(4):979-82. PubMed ID: 2887396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Precise calculation of the cumulative distribution function and its inverse function for Fisher's F and Student's t tests.
    Harper JF
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1985 Nov; 21(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 3853486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Empirical evaluation of two-sample statistical tests for differences of stepping phase during insect walking.
    Cocatre-Zilgien JH; Delcomyn F
    Biol Cybern; 1988; 59(6):367-77. PubMed ID: 3207775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Issues in biomedical statistics: comparing means under normal distribution theory.
    Ludbrook J
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1995 Apr; 65(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 7717947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biostatistics Series Module 3: Comparing Groups: Numerical Variables.
    Hazra A; Gogtay N
    Indian J Dermatol; 2016; 61(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 27293244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal sample sizes for precise interval estimation of Welch's procedure under various allocation and cost considerations.
    Shieh G; Jan SL
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Mar; 44(1):202-12. PubMed ID: 21805061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A pharmacodynamic analysis method to determine the relative importance of drug concentration and treatment time on effect.
    Millenbaugh NJ; Wientjes MG; Au JL
    Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2000; 45(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 10755313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical research XV. From the clinical judgment to the statistical model. Difference between means. Student's t test].
    Rivas-Ruiz R; Pérez-Rodríguez M; Talavera JO
    Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2013; 51(3):300-3. PubMed ID: 23883459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Introduction to statistical methodology].
    Jenny JY
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 1995 Dec; 5(4):249-52. PubMed ID: 24193442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Overview of biostatistics used in clinical research.
    De Muth JE
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2009 Jan; 66(1):70-81. PubMed ID: 19106347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistics for clinicians. 5. Interval data (I).
    Nanivadekar AS; Kannappan AR
    J Assoc Physicians India; 1991 May; 39(5):403-7. PubMed ID: 1960160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A note on the power of Fisher's least significant difference procedure.
    Meier U
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):253-63. PubMed ID: 17128424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Difference of two dependent sensitivities and specificities: Comparison of various approaches.
    Wenzel D; Zapf A
    Biom J; 2013 Sep; 55(5):705-18. PubMed ID: 23828661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A practitioner's guide to developing critical appraisal skills: what is the difference between clinical and statistical significance?
    Brignardello-Petersen R; Carrasco-Labra A; Shah P; Azarpazhooh A
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2013 Jul; 144(7):780-6. PubMed ID: 23813258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Introduction to biostatistics: Part 3, Sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and hypothesis testing.
    Gaddis GM; Gaddis ML
    Ann Emerg Med; 1990 May; 19(5):591-7. PubMed ID: 2331107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size determination for confidence intervals on the population mean and on the difference between two population means.
    Beal SL
    Biometrics; 1989 Sep; 45(3):969-77. PubMed ID: 2790131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Non-inferiority trials: the 'at least as good as' criterion.
    Laster LL; Johnson MF
    Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 12520556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A test for serial correlation in univariate repeated-measures analysis.
    Hearne EM; Clark GM; Hatch JP
    Biometrics; 1983 Mar; 39(1):237-43. PubMed ID: 6871352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.