These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28708428)

  • 1. Reliability and Correlation of Static and Dynamic Foot Arch Measurement in a Healthy Pediatric Population.
    Scholz T; Zech A; Wegscheider K; Lezius S; Braumann KM; Sehner S; Hollander K
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2017 Sep; 107(5):419-427. PubMed ID: 28708428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Describing the medial longitudinal arch using footprint indices and a clinical grading system.
    Queen RM; Mall NA; Hardaker WM; Nunley JA
    Foot Ankle Int; 2007 Apr; 28(4):456-62. PubMed ID: 17475140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic plantar pressure parameters associated with static arch height index during gait.
    Teyhen DS; Stoltenberg BE; Collinsworth KM; Giesel CL; Williams DG; Kardouni CH; Molloy JM; Goffar SL; Christie DS; McPoil T
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 May; 24(4):391-6. PubMed ID: 19246138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationships between clinical measures of static foot posture and plantar pressure during static standing and walking.
    Jonely H; Brismée JM; Sizer PS; James CR
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Oct; 26(8):873-9. PubMed ID: 21632159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the Medial Longitudinal Arch of the Foot: Correlations, Reliability, and Accuracy in People With a Low Arch.
    Zuil-Escobar JC; Martínez-Cepa CB; Martín-Urrialde JA; Gómez-Conesa A
    Phys Ther; 2019 Mar; 99(3):364-372. PubMed ID: 30535273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the medial longitudinal arch: a comparison between the dynamic plantar pressure measurement system and radiographic analysis.
    Yalçin N; Esen E; Kanatli U; Yetkin H
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2010; 44(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 21088466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurements used to characterize the foot and the medial longitudinal arch: reliability and validity.
    Williams DS; McClay IS
    Phys Ther; 2000 Sep; 80(9):864-71. PubMed ID: 10960934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability of footprint geometric and plantar loading measurements in children using the Emed(®) M system.
    Tong JW; Kong PW
    Gait Posture; 2013 Jun; 38(2):281-6. PubMed ID: 23266249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ability to predict dynamic foot posture from static measurements.
    Franettovich MM; McPoil TG; Russell T; Skardoon G; Vicenzino B
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2007; 97(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 17369317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Medial longitudinal arch of the foot: stationary versus walking measures.
    Cashmere T; Smith R; Hunt A
    Foot Ankle Int; 1999 Feb; 20(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 10063980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does foot placement affect the reliability of static foot posture measurements?
    McPoil TG; Carrell D; Ehlers D; Kuhlman H; Mufti J; Pomeroy M; Taylor O; Cornwall MW
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2014; 104(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 24504575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contact force ratio: a new parameter to assess foot arch function.
    Leung AK; Cheng JC; Zhang M; Fan Y; Dong X
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2004 Aug; 28(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 15382810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Arch height index measurement system: establishment of reliability and normative values.
    Butler RJ; Hillstrom H; Song J; Richards CJ; Davis IS
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2008; 98(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 18347117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationships between foot arch volumes and dynamic plantar pressure during midstance of walking in preschool children.
    Chang HW; Chieh HF; Lin CJ; Su FC; Tsai MJ
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e94535. PubMed ID: 24736650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of static footprints and pedobarography in obese and non-obese children.
    Taisa Filippin N; de Almeida Bacarin T; Lobo da Costa PH
    Foot Ankle Int; 2008 Nov; 29(11):1141-4. PubMed ID: 19026210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Static and dynamic plantar pressure measurements in adolescents].
    Tuna H; Yildiz M; Celtik C; Kokino S
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2004; 38(3):200-5. PubMed ID: 15347920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Static and dynamic foot characteristics in children aged 1-13 years: a cross-sectional study.
    Müller S; Carlsohn A; Müller J; Baur H; Mayer F
    Gait Posture; 2012 Mar; 35(3):389-94. PubMed ID: 22118730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic footprint measurement collection technique and intrarater reliability: ink mat, paper pedography, and electronic pedography.
    Fascione JM; Crews RT; Wrobel JS
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2012; 102(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 22461270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity of 3 clinical techniques for the measurement of static foot posture in older people.
    Menz HB; Munteanu SE
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2005 Aug; 35(8):479-86. PubMed ID: 16187508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Foot and ankle characteristics in patellofemoral pain syndrome: a case control and reliability study.
    Barton CJ; Bonanno D; Levinger P; Menz HB
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2010 May; 40(5):286-96. PubMed ID: 20436240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.