These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28708920)
1. Complications and Clinical Considerations of the Implant-Retained Zirconia Complete-Arch Prosthesis with Various Opposing Dentitions. Gonzalez J; Triplett RG Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(4):864-869. PubMed ID: 28708920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with zirconia complete-arch fixed implant-supported prostheses: An up to 4-year retrospective clinical study. Tischler M; Patch C; Bidra AS J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):204-209. PubMed ID: 29559219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retrievable metal ceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses with milled titanium frameworks and all-ceramic crowns: retrospective clinical study with up to 10 years of follow-up. Maló P; de Araújo Nobre M; Borges J; Almeida R J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):256-64. PubMed ID: 22339902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retrospective 2- to 7-Year Follow-Up Study of 20 Double Full-Arch Implant-Supported Monolithic Zirconia Fixed Prostheses: Measurements and Recommendations for Optimal Design. Rojas Vizcaya F J Prosthodont; 2018 Jul; 27(6):501-508. PubMed ID: 27570943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks. Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prosthetic complications with monolithic or micro-veneered implant-supported zirconia single-unit, multiple-unit, and complete-arch prostheses on titanium base abutments: A single center retrospective study with mean follow-up period of 72.35 months. Saponaro PC; Karasan D; Donmez MB; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Feb; 25(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 36321480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing zirconia implant fixed complete prostheses: clinical results and technical complications up to 4 years of function. Papaspyridakos P; Lal K Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):659-65. PubMed ID: 22413889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Complications and patient-centered outcomes with an implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prosthesis: 1 year results. Limmer B; Sanders AE; Reside G; Cooper LF J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 24393461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retrospective analysis of 26 complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia prostheses with feldspathic porcelain veneering limited to the facial surface. Venezia P; Torsello F; Cavalcanti R; D'Amato S J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):506-12. PubMed ID: 25979446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour. Larsson C Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Catastrophic failure of a monolithic zirconia prosthesis. Chang JS; Ji W; Choi CH; Kim S J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Feb; 113(2):86-90. PubMed ID: 25444283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implant rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with predominantly monolithic zirconia compared to metal-acrylic prostheses: a 2-year retrospective clinical study. Cappare P; Ferrini F; Mariani G; Nagni M; Cattoni F J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2021; 35(4 Suppl. 1):99-112. PubMed ID: 34425665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ratios of Cantilever Lengths and Anterior-Posterior Spreads of Definitive Hybrid Full-Arch, Screw-Retained Prostheses: Results of a Clinical Study. Drago C J Prosthodont; 2018 Jun; 27(5):402-408. PubMed ID: 27416302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dual jaw treatment of edentulism using implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed prostheses. Altarawneh S; Limmer B; Reside GJ; Cooper L J Esthet Restor Dent; 2015; 27(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 25640984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital workflow in full-arch implant rehabilitation with segmented minimally veneered monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: 2-year clinical follow-up. Papaspyridakos P; Kang K; DeFuria C; Amin S; Kudara Y; Weber HP J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 Jan; 30(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 28792115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Full zirconia fixed detachable implant-retained restorations manufactured from monolithic zirconia: clinical report after two years in service. Rojas-Vizcaya F J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):570-6. PubMed ID: 22003832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective 10-year cohort study based on a randomized, controlled trial (RCT) on implant-supported full-arch maxillary prostheses. part II: prosthetic outcomes and maintenance. Fischer K; Stenberg T Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Aug; 15(4):498-508. PubMed ID: 21834863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prosthodontic maintenance of overdentures on zirconia implants: 1-year results of a randomized controlled trial. Osman RB; Ma S Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):461-8. PubMed ID: 25191890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Survival of 2039 complete arch fixed implant-supported zirconia prostheses: A retrospective study. Bidra AS; Tischler M; Patch C J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):220-224. PubMed ID: 28689903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]