These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28708986)

  • 1. Listener estimates of talker age in a single-talker, 50-year longitudinal sample.
    Hunter EJ; Ferguson SH
    J Commun Disord; 2017 Jul; 68():103-112. PubMed ID: 28708986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of age on speech and voice quality ratings.
    Goy H; Kathleen Pichora-Fuller M; van Lieshout P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1648. PubMed ID: 27106312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.
    Allen JS; Miller JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3171-83. PubMed ID: 15237841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The advantage of knowing the talker.
    Souza P; Gehani N; Wright R; McCloy D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):689-700. PubMed ID: 24131605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Word Learning in Deaf Adults Who Use Cochlear Implants: The Role of Talker Variability and Attention to the Mouth.
    Hartman J; Saffran J; Litovsky R
    Ear Hear; 2024 Mar-Apr 01; 45(2):337-350. PubMed ID: 37695563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Divided listening in the free field becomes asymmetric when acoustic cues are limited.
    Fumero MJ; Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108444. PubMed ID: 35078133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Working-memory disruption by task-irrelevant talkers depends on degree of talker familiarity.
    Kreitewolf J; Wöstmann M; Tune S; Plöchl M; Obleser J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1108-1118. PubMed ID: 30993655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Listener estimations of talker age: A meta-analysis of the literature.
    Hunter EJ; Ferguson SH; Newman CA
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2016 Oct; 41(3):101-5. PubMed ID: 26079468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity.
    McLaughlin DE; Carter YD; Cheng CC; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1088-1107. PubMed ID: 31218598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implicit Talker Training Improves Comprehension of Auditory Speech in Noise.
    Kreitewolf J; Mathias SR; von Kriegstein K
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1584. PubMed ID: 28959226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Talker familiarity and the accommodation of talker variability.
    Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC; Akahane-Yamada R; Saltzman D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 May; 83(4):1842-1860. PubMed ID: 33398658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of disfluency cues in spoken language processing: Insights from aging.
    Saryazdi R; DeSantis D; Johnson EK; Chambers CG
    Psychol Aging; 2021 Dec; 36(8):928-942. PubMed ID: 34843331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Talker identification across source mechanisms: experiments with laryngeal and electrolarynx speech.
    Perrachione TK; Stepp CE; Hillman RE; Wong PC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):1651-65. PubMed ID: 24801962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clearly, fame isn't everything: Talker familiarity does not augment talker adaptation.
    Hatter ER; King CJ; Shorey AE; Stilp CE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Apr; 86(3):962-975. PubMed ID: 36417128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Talker variability in audio-visual speech perception.
    Heald SL; Nusbaum HC
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():698. PubMed ID: 25076919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Listeners' attitudes toward accented talkers uniquely predicts accented speech perception.
    Ingvalson EM; Lansford KL; Federova V; Fernandez G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL234. PubMed ID: 28372098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Joint population coding and temporal coherence link an attended talker's voice and location features in naturalistic multi-talker scenes.
    van der Heijden K; Patel P; Bickel S; Herrero JL; Mehta AD; Mesgarani N
    bioRxiv; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38798551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Talker-specific learning in speech perception.
    Nygaard LC; Pisoni DB
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Apr; 60(3):355-76. PubMed ID: 9599989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.