412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28709889)
1. Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improves Classification of Prostate Lesions: A Study of Pathological Outcomes on Targeted Prostate Biopsy.
Druskin SC; Ward R; Purysko AS; Young A; Tosoian JJ; Ghabili K; Andreas D; Klein E; Ross AE; Macura KJ
J Urol; 2017 Dec; 198(6):1301-1308. PubMed ID: 28709889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk Stratification of Equivocal Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate.
Ullrich T; Quentin M; Arsov C; Schmaltz AK; Tschischka A; Laqua N; Hiester A; Blondin D; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
J Urol; 2018 Mar; 199(3):691-698. PubMed ID: 28941924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Central zone lesions on magnetic resonance imaging: Should we be concerned?
Tan WP; Mazzone A; Shors S; Antoine N; Ekbal S; Khare N; McKiel C; Pessis D; Deane L
Urol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):31.e7-31.e12. PubMed ID: 27692837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Single Center Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging against Transperineal Prostate Mapping Biopsy: An Analysis of Men with Benign Histology and Insignificant Cancer following Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy.
Pal RP; Ahmad R; Trecartan S; Voss J; Ahmed S; Bazo A; Lloyd J; Walton TJ
J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):302-308. PubMed ID: 29477717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Detection of Prostate Cancer Harboring Adverse Pathological Features of Intraductal Carcinoma and Invasive Cribriform Carcinoma.
Prendeville S; Gertner M; Maganti M; Pintilie M; Perlis N; Toi A; Evans AJ; Finelli A; van der Kwast TH; Ghai S
J Urol; 2018 Jul; 200(1):104-113. PubMed ID: 29408568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective Evaluation of PI-RADS™ Version 2 Using the International Society of Urological Pathology Prostate Cancer Grade Group System.
Mehralivand S; Bednarova S; Shih JH; Mertan FV; Gaur S; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
J Urol; 2017 Sep; 198(3):583-590. PubMed ID: 28373133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contribution of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion MRI to PI-RADS for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Tavakoli AA; Hielscher T; Badura P; Görtz M; Kuder TA; Gnirs R; Schwab C; Hohenfellner M; Schlemmer HP; Bonekamp D
Radiology; 2023 Jan; 306(1):186-199. PubMed ID: 35972360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anterior Localization of Prostate Cancer Suspicious Lesions in 1,161 Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsies.
Leyh-Bannurah SR; Kachanov M; Beyersdorff D; Preisser F; Tilki D; Fisch M; Graefen M; Budäus L
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1035-1040. PubMed ID: 29935274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is it Time to Perform Only Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Cores? Our Experience with 1,032 Men Who Underwent Prostate Biopsy.
Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo GD; Galia A; Fraggetta F; Pennisi M
J Urol; 2018 Oct; 200(4):774-778. PubMed ID: 29679618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Application of dynamic contrast enhanced status in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostatic cancer with PI-RADS 4 lesion].
Yuan CW; Li R; Li ZH; Liu Y; Shan GZ; Li XS; Zhou LQ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Oct; 55(5):838-842. PubMed ID: 37807737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How Often is the Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Score Needed in PI-RADS Version 2?
Roh AT; Fan RE; Sonn GA; Vasanawala SS; Ghanouni P; Loening AM
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2020; 49(3):173-176. PubMed ID: 31126664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abbreviated Biparametric Prostate MR Imaging in Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen.
Kuhl CK; Bruhn R; Krämer N; Nebelung S; Heidenreich A; Schrading S
Radiology; 2017 Nov; 285(2):493-505. PubMed ID: 28727544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. PI-RADS Version 2: A Pictorial Update.
Purysko AS; Rosenkrantz AB; Barentsz JO; Weinreb JC; Macura KJ
Radiographics; 2016; 36(5):1354-72. PubMed ID: 27471952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of PI-RADS v1 and v2 for multiparametric MRI detection of prostate cancer with whole-mount histological workup as reference standard.
Schaudinn A; Gawlitza J; Mucha S; Linder N; Franz T; Horn LC; Kahn T; Busse H
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():180-185. PubMed ID: 31153562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Prostate Cancer Detection.
Mertan FV; Greer MD; Shih JH; George AK; Kongnyuy M; Muthigi A; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
J Urol; 2016 Sep; 196(3):690-6. PubMed ID: 27101772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.
Hofbauer SL; Maxeiner A; Kittner B; Heckmann R; Reimann M; Wiemer L; Asbach P; Haas M; Penzkofer T; Stephan C; Friedersdorff F; Fuller F; Miller K; Cash H
J Urol; 2018 Oct; 200(4):767-773. PubMed ID: 29733838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostate Cancer: Interobserver Agreement and Accuracy with the Revised Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System at Multiparametric MR Imaging.
Muller BG; Shih JH; Sankineni S; Marko J; Rais-Bahrami S; George AK; de la Rosette JJ; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto P; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
Radiology; 2015 Dec; 277(3):741-50. PubMed ID: 26098458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study.
Thompson JE; Moses D; Shnier R; Brenner P; Delprado W; Ponsky L; Pulbrook M; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Hayen A; Stricker PD
J Urol; 2014 Jul; 192(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 24518762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the prostate imaging reporting and data system for the detection of prostate cancer by the results of targeted biopsy of the prostate.
Baur AD; Maxeiner A; Franiel T; Kilic E; Huppertz A; Schwenke C; Hamm B; Durmus T
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jun; 49(6):411-20. PubMed ID: 24598440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
