613 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28710605)
1. Current clinical applications of coronary optical coherence tomography.
Kume T; Uemura S
Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2018 Jan; 33(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 28710605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial.
Ali ZA; Maehara A; Généreux P; Shlofmitz RA; Fabbiocchi F; Nazif TM; Guagliumi G; Meraj PM; Alfonso F; Samady H; Akasaka T; Carlson EB; Leesar MA; Matsumura M; Ozan MO; Mintz GS; Ben-Yehuda O; Stone GW;
Lancet; 2016 Nov; 388(10060):2618-2628. PubMed ID: 27806900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
Maehara A; Ben-Yehuda O; Ali Z; Wijns W; Bezerra HG; Shite J; Généreux P; Nichols M; Jenkins P; Witzenbichler B; Mintz GS; Stone GW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optical coherence tomography is a kid on the block: I would choose intravascular ultrasound.
Dash D
Indian Heart J; 2017; 69(3):407-410. PubMed ID: 28648442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention compared with other imaging guidance: a meta-analysis.
Kuku KO; Ekanem E; Azizi V; Melaku G; Bui A; Meirovich YF; Dheendsa A; Beyene S; Hideo-Kajita A; Lipinski MJ; Waksman R; Garcia-Garcia HM
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 34(4):503-513. PubMed ID: 29151138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In Vivo Calcium Detection by Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Angiography.
Wang X; Matsumura M; Mintz GS; Lee T; Zhang W; Cao Y; Fujino A; Lin Y; Usui E; Kanaji Y; Murai T; Yonetsu T; Kakuta T; Maehara A
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Aug; 10(8):869-879. PubMed ID: 28797408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a review of current clinical applications.
Kurogi K; Ishii M; Yamamoto N; Yamanaga K; Tsujita K
Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2021 Apr; 36(2):169-177. PubMed ID: 33454867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vivo coronary lesion differentiation with computed tomography angiography and intravascular ultrasound as compared to optical coherence tomography.
Wieringa WG; Lexis CP; Lipsic E; van der Werf HW; Burgerhof JG; Hagens VE; Bartels GL; Broersen A; Schurer RA; Tan ES; van der Harst P; van den Heuvel AF; Willems TP; Pundziute G
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(2):111-118. PubMed ID: 28169175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contemporary practices using intravascular imaging guidance with IVUS or OCT to optimize percutaneous coronary intervention.
Nguyen P; Seto A
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2020 Feb; 18(2):103-115. PubMed ID: 32077345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Combined use of optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with coronary artery disease].
Hou JB; Meng LB; Jing SH; Han ZG; Yu H; Yu B
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2008 Nov; 36(11):980-4. PubMed ID: 19102909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multimodality imaging of attenuated plaque using grayscale and virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and optical coherent tomography.
Kang SJ; Ahn JM; Han S; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Mintz GS; Park SJ
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jul; 88(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 25511369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Role of Intracoronary Plaque Imaging with Intravascular Ultrasound, Optical Coherence Tomography, and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.
Hoang V; Grounds J; Pham D; Virani S; Hamzeh I; Qureshi AM; Lakkis N; Alam M
Curr Atheroscler Rep; 2016 Sep; 18(9):57. PubMed ID: 27485540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A review in enormity of OCT and its enduring understanding of vulnerable plaque in coronary bifurcation lesion.
Shrestha R; Shrestha A; Kan J; Chen S
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Nov; 34(11):1679-1684. PubMed ID: 29858960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Combined Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound Study on Plaque Rupture, Plaque Erosion, and Calcified Nodule in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Incidence, Morphologic Characteristics, and Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Higuma T; Soeda T; Abe N; Yamada M; Yokoyama H; Shibutani S; Vergallo R; Minami Y; Ong DS; Lee H; Okumura K; Jang IK
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 8(9):1166-1176. PubMed ID: 26117464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visualization of coronary atherosclerotic plaques in patients using optical coherence tomography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
Jang IK; Bouma BE; Kang DH; Park SJ; Park SW; Seung KB; Choi KB; Shishkov M; Schlendorf K; Pomerantsev E; Houser SL; Aretz HT; Tearney GJ
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2002 Feb; 39(4):604-9. PubMed ID: 11849858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Role of Vascular Imaging in Guiding Routine Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Bare Metal Stent and Drug-Eluting Stent Trials.
Alsidawi S; Effat M; Rahman S; Abdallah M; Leesar M
Cardiovasc Ther; 2015 Dec; 33(6):360-6. PubMed ID: 26363283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between Optical COherence tomography guidance and Angiography guidance in percutaneous coronary intervention (COCOA): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Kubo T; Shinke T; Okamura T; Hibi K; Nakazawa G; Morino Y; Shite J; Ino Y; Kitabata H; Shimokawa T; Akasaka T
J Cardiol; 2018 Aug; 72(2):170-175. PubMed ID: 29486964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of optical coherence tomography-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of a randomized, controlled OCTIVUS trial.
Kang DY; Ahn JM; Park H; Lee PH; Kang SJ; Lee SW; Kim YH; Park SW; Kim SW; Hur SH; Cho YK; Lee CH; Hong SJ; Hong YJ; Yoon YW; Kim SJ; Bae JH; Oh JH; Park DW; Park SJ
Am Heart J; 2020 Oct; 228():72-80. PubMed ID: 32871327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention.
Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Sirbu V; Musumeci G; Lortkipanidze N; Fujino Y; Wang W; Nakamura S; Erglis A; Guagliumi G; Costa MA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Mar; 6(3):228-36. PubMed ID: 23517833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Imaging assessment and accuracy in coronary artery autopsy: comparison of frequency-domain optical coherence tomography with intravascular ultrasound and histology.
Shimokado A; Kubo T; Matsuo Y; Ino Y; Shiono Y; Shimamura K; Katayama Y; Taruya A; Nishiguchi T; Kashiwagi M; Kitabata H; Tanaka A; Hozumi T; Akasaka T
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Oct; 35(10):1785-1790. PubMed ID: 31175528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
