These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28711153)
1. There's no difference-are you sure? Meldrum DR; Su HI Fertil Steril; 2017 Aug; 108(2):231-232. PubMed ID: 28711153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Bayesian designs and the control of frequentist characteristics: a practical solution. Ventz S; Trippa L Biometrics; 2015 Mar; 71(1):218-226. PubMed ID: 25196832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How much statistics do we need? Bacharova L J Electrocardiol; 2007 Jan; 40(1):110-1. PubMed ID: 16916520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. On the power of the test for cluster bias. Jak S; Oort FJ Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 Nov; 68(3):434-55. PubMed ID: 25776804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biases induced by pooling samples in microarray experiments. Mary-Huard T; Daudin JJ; Baccini M; Biggeri A; Bar-Hen A Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):i313-8. PubMed ID: 17646312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monte-Carlo sure: a black-box optimization of regularization parameters for general denoising algorithms. Ramani S; Blu T; Unser M IEEE Trans Image Process; 2008 Sep; 17(9):1540-54. PubMed ID: 18701393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preimplantation genetic screening: what is the clinical efficiency? Paulson RJ Fertil Steril; 2017 Aug; 108(2):228-230. PubMed ID: 28697911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of trial duration on the bias of the estimated treatment effect in clinical trials when individual heterogeneity is ignored. Cécilia-Joseph E; Auvert B; Broët P; Moreau T Biom J; 2015 May; 57(3):371-83. PubMed ID: 25597640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [An introduction to causality principles in biomedical research]. Stang A Gesundheitswesen; 2014 Dec; 76(12):874-82; quiz 883-4. PubMed ID: 25525680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Mitigating the effects of measurement noise on Granger causality. Nalatore H; Ding M; Rangarajan G Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2007 Mar; 75(3 Pt 1):031123. PubMed ID: 17500684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of missing data in palliative care studies. Palmer JL J Pain Symptom Manage; 2004 Dec; 28(6):612-8. PubMed ID: 15589087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simultaneous inference and bias analysis for longitudinal data with covariate measurement error and missing responses. Yi GY; Liu W; Wu L Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 20528858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Some statistical issues in microarray gene expression data. Mayo MS; Gajewski BJ; Morris JS Radiat Res; 2006 Jun; 165(6):745-8. PubMed ID: 16802876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Use of the simulation in the clinical investigation]. Monleón-Getino T Med Clin (Barc); 2013 Dec; 141(12):550-5. PubMed ID: 24238627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Studying the prevention of acute kidney injury: lessons from an 18th-century mathematician. Chertow GM; Palevsky PM; Greene T Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2006 Sep; 1(5):1124-7. PubMed ID: 17699335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [The ABC's of medical statistics. Reading and understanding clinical trials]. Labenz J; Kunz CU Urologe A; 2011 Feb; 50(2):233-43; quiz 244. PubMed ID: 21312087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimation of treatment effects in all-comers randomized clinical trials with a predictive marker. Choai Y; Matsui S Biometrics; 2015 Mar; 71(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 25303178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Related causal frameworks for surrogate outcomes. Joffe MM; Greene T Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):530-8. PubMed ID: 18759836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On latent-variable model misspecification in structural measurement error models for binary response. Huang X; Tebbs JM Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):710-8. PubMed ID: 18945265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]