These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28711521)

  • 1. A comparison of resetting and nonresetting contingencies in progressive-duration schedules.
    Valois M; Peck S; Byrne T
    Behav Processes; 2017 Sep; 142():119-125. PubMed ID: 28711521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A progressive-duration schedule of reinforcement.
    Gulotta KB; Byrne T
    Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():93-7. PubMed ID: 26536304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Demand in rats responding under duration-based schedules of reinforcement.
    Peck S; Byrne T
    Behav Processes; 2016 Jul; 128():47-52. PubMed ID: 27063407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response duration is sensitive to both immediate and delayed reinforcement.
    Byrne T; Sarno B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Jan; 111(1):94-115. PubMed ID: 30565230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acquisition of operant behavior in rats with delayed reinforcement: A retractable-lever procedure.
    McNamara AA; Johnson LE; Tate C; Chiang T; Byrne T
    Behav Processes; 2015 Feb; 111():37-41. PubMed ID: 25464338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Control of response duration by delayed reinforcers: A systematic replication.
    Byrne T
    Behav Processes; 2019 Oct; 167():103920. PubMed ID: 31374227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does DRO type matter?: Cycle versus resetting contingencies in eliminating responding.
    Nighbor TD; Cook JE; Oliver AC; Lattal KA
    Behav Processes; 2020 Dec; 181():104257. PubMed ID: 33002565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-administration of remifentanil, an ultra-short acting opioid, under continuous and progressive-ratio schedules of reinforcement in rats.
    Panlilio LV; Schindler CW
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2000 May; 150(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 10867977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reinforcer devaluation by extinction depends on the food restriction protocol.
    Baker TW; Weisman RG; Beninger RJ
    Behav Processes; 2012 May; 90(1):124-9. PubMed ID: 22469648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rats show molar sensitivity to different aspects of random-interval-with-linear-feedback-functions and random-ratio schedules.
    Reed P
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Oct; 41(4):432-43. PubMed ID: 25915752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance on a progressive-ratio schedule of food reinforcement during concurrent access to a sucrose solution or tap water.
    Derenne A
    Behav Processes; 2020 Apr; 173():104040. PubMed ID: 31987848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of progressive hold and progressive response schedules of reinforcement.
    Alvarez-Sekely CS; Toscano-Zapien AL; Salles-Ize P; Zepeda-Ruiz WA; Lopez-Guzman MA; Velazquez-Martinez DN
    Behav Processes; 2023 Feb; 205():104822. PubMed ID: 36669746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wheel-running reinforcement in free-feeding and food-deprived rats.
    Belke TW; Pierce WD
    Behav Processes; 2016 Mar; 124():1-9. PubMed ID: 26631601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response-food delay gradients for lever pressing and schedule-induced licking in rats.
    Pellón R; Pérez-Padilla A
    Learn Behav; 2013 Jun; 41(2):218-27. PubMed ID: 23271664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Second-order stimuli do not always increase overall response rates in second-order schedules of reinforcement in the rat.
    Wilson DI; Bowman EM
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2004 Jul; 174(3):430-7. PubMed ID: 15083254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of central 5-hydroxytryptamine depletion on changeover behaviour in concurrent schedules of reinforcement.
    Al-Ruwaitea AS; Chiang TJ; Ho MY; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1999 Jun; 144(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 10435393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of prefeeding on fixed-ratio pausing is jointly determined by past and upcoming reinforcer magnitudes.
    Galuska CM; Yadon KA
    Behav Processes; 2011 Jan; 86(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 20804830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement: a comparison of two-lever procedures.
    Sutphin G; Byrne T; Poling A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Jan; 69(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 9465411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Body weight and response acquisition with delayed reinforcement.
    Lattal KA; Williams AM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 Jan; 67(1):131-43. PubMed ID: 9037784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
    Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.